メニュー
Review English text edits in org-mode files from a git diff. Checks grammar, style, translation quality (RU→EN), and produces a clean patch. Use when reviewing org-mode writing, checking English quality of documentation edits, or auditing translation naturalness.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Delegate deep domain analysis, architecture planning, or complex decisions to your own scope's expert agent (claude-opus). Ensures the expert is running for YOUR scope. Use for architectural decisions, multi-step planning, tradeoff evaluation, domain modeling. Never borrows agents from other scopes.
Full feature development cycle with herdr-managed agent panes. Ensures an ai-workers tab exists with coder, researcher, and critic panes, then orchestrates implement-review loop via pi-link. Use when you want a persistent multi-agent workspace managed by herdr.
Delegate a research task to your own scope's researcher agent. Ensures ai-workers panes are running for YOUR scope, then sends the request to <scope>@researcher. Use for codebase exploration, external references, pattern lookup. Never borrows agents from other scopes.
Delegate a code review to your own scope's critic agent. Ensures ai-workers panes are running for YOUR scope, then sends the request to <scope>@critic. Use for code review, diff review, quality checks. Never borrows agents from other scopes.
Analyze colleague feedback for relevance, objectivity, and practical value. Use when evaluating code review comments, architectural feedback, or any critique from a peer before deciding what to act on.
Full feature development cycle with multi-agent collaboration — researcher, coder, and reviewer. Use when implementing a non-trivial feature that benefits from research, iterative coding, and independent review.
| name | note-writer |
| description | Review English text edits in org-mode files from a git diff. Checks grammar, style, translation quality (RU→EN), and produces a clean patch. Use when reviewing org-mode writing, checking English quality of documentation edits, or auditing translation naturalness. |
VERSION: 1.1
Review English text edits provided as a unified git diff (source text is org-mode) and help the user:
Parse the diff — identify hunks, classify lines (+ added, - removed, context). Pair removed/added blocks when it is clearly a modification.
Grammar & correctness pass — for each changed line detect mistakes (articles, prepositions, tense, agreement, punctuation, sentence boundaries, word order). Provide: Problem → Fix → Explanation.
Style & clarity pass — improve naturalness and flow with minimal edits. Prefer concise, idiomatic English. Preserve tone/voice unless it harms clarity.
Translation quality check — detect Russianisms and literal translation patterns: unnatural collocations, incorrect prepositions/articles, calques/false friends, overly heavy nominalizations, passive voice where unnatural, word order mirroring Russian. Give 1–2 plausible meanings when ambiguous, offer safe rewrites.
Rule snippet for every flagged issue — Rule name + 1–2 sentence explanation + tiny example if helpful.
Produce final rewrite — "Suggested patch (clean)" section with revised lines only, no diff markers, org-mode markup preserved.
