メニュー
Create an Architectural Decision Record (ADR) to document a significant design or technology choice
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Health check procedures D1–D14 for the Audit agent — structural validation, attention budget, version checks, workspace integrity, and static audit
Configure and manage Model Context Protocol servers for external tool access
Review a UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, semantic HTML, ARIA usage, keyboard navigation, focus management, colour contrast, and screen reader compatibility
Design or review a REST or GraphQL API — resource modeling, versioning strategy, error contract, OpenAPI/schema-first workflow, and security baseline
Generate a CHANGELOG.md entry from staged changes, a commit range, or a PR diff — following Keep a Changelog format with conventional commit classification
Set up and audit environment variable management — create .env.example, add startup validation, separate secrets from config, and document every variable
| name | create-adr |
| description | Create an Architectural Decision Record (ADR) to document a significant design or technology choice |
| compatibility | >=1.4 |
Skill metadata: version "1.0"; license MIT; tags [documentation, architecture, decision, adr]; compatibility ">=1.4"; recommended tools [editFiles, codebase].
Create a structured ADR document that captures the context, decision, consequences, and alternatives for a significant architectural choice.
Gather inputs — Collect or infer: decision title (verb phrase), context (problem/constraints), decision (what and why), alternatives (rejected and why), stakeholders. Ask if required inputs are missing.
Determine sequence number — List docs/adr/ (create if absent). Next 4-digit number.
Write the ADR — Save to docs/adr/adr-NNNN-<title-slug>.md using template below.
Confirm — Show the created file path.
---
title: "ADR-NNNN: [Decision Title]"
status: "Proposed"
date: "YYYY-MM-DD"
authors: "[Stakeholder Names/Roles]"
tags: ["architecture", "decision"]
supersedes: ""
superseded_by: ""
---
# ADR-NNNN: [Decision Title]
## Status
**Proposed** | Accepted | Rejected | Superseded | Deprecated
## Context
[Problem statement, technical constraints, business requirements, and environmental factors
requiring this decision.]
## Decision
[Chosen solution with clear rationale for selection.]
## Consequences
### Positive
- **POS-001**: [Beneficial outcomes and advantages]
- **POS-002**: [Performance, maintainability, scalability improvements]
### Negative
- **NEG-001**: [Trade-offs, limitations, drawbacks]
- **NEG-002**: [Technical debt or complexity introduced]
## Alternatives Considered
### [Alternative 1 Name]
- **ALT-001**: **Description**: [Brief technical description]
- **ALT-002**: **Rejection Reason**: [Why this option was not selected]
### [Alternative 2 Name]
- **ALT-003**: **Description**: [Brief technical description]
- **ALT-004**: **Rejection Reason**: [Why this option was not selected]
## Implementation Notes
- **IMP-001**: [Key implementation considerations]
- **IMP-002**: [Migration or rollout strategy if applicable]
- **IMP-003**: [Monitoring and success criteria]
## References
- **REF-001**: [Related ADRs]
- **REF-002**: [External documentation]
- **REF-003**: [Standards or frameworks referenced]