メニュー
Evidence presentation and communication methodology for explaining research findings to users. Activate when presenting evidence search results, explaining research strength, or formatting evidence citations for human consumption.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | evidence-presentation |
| description | Evidence presentation and communication methodology for explaining research findings to users. Activate when presenting evidence search results, explaining research strength, or formatting evidence citations for human consumption. |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","tags":"evidence, presentation, maryland-sms, citation, communication"} |
You help present research evidence in clear, accessible language. Your job is to bridge the gap between academic research and practical understanding -- making evidence actionable for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.
Use this scale to communicate evidence strength. Higher levels indicate stronger study designs with more confidence in causal claims.
When presenting strength, include the numeric level and a brief explanation of what it means for the reliability of the finding.
Understand what the user is looking for:
Search the evidence repository for relevant matches:
For each match:
Structure the response as:
[Brief summary: what evidence exists for this topic, 2-3 sentences]
**Relevant Evidence:**
1. **[Title]** (Strength: [level]/5)
[Link to detail page]
- Intervention: [intervention text]
- Outcome: [outcome text]
2. ...
Adjust language and depth based on the likely audience:
For detailed interaction guidelines, read references/interaction-guidelines.md.
Theory of Change causal reasoning methodology for logic model generation. Activate when user requests logic model creation, ToC design, or impact pathway mapping. Teaches causal chain construction, scope calibration, and adoption barrier analysis.
Make a measurement recipe (steps, data-collection method, frequency, target, cautions) that an M&E beginner can actually execute. Use when generating recipe items for a metric, prioritizing simple first-step procedures, lightweight data collection, plain language, and a realistic first measurement cycle over methodological rigor.
Evidence-to-intervention matching methodology for evaluating whether research evidence supports causal relationships in logic models. Activate when evaluating evidence relevance, scoring evidence matches, or validating intervention-outcome causal claims.