メニュー
Ruthless clarification context. Use when #qh prefix detected. Interrogates assumptions and forces explicit answers before proceeding. For lighter touch, use mode-question-light.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Budget-weighted prompt execution. depth_probe frames thinking. plan_prompt budgets effort. Per-phase pauses enable midstream metathinking. audit_probe catches gaps.
Surfaces interpretations before answering. Use when user appends #? or when question has multiple valid readings. Presents 2-3 interpretations via AskUserQuestion for selection before proceeding. For deep investigation, use mode-think.
Side-by-side comparison of options. Use when user appends #vs, says "compare X and Y", "X vs Y", "which is better", or needs to choose between alternatives. For honest yes/no verdicts, use mode-judge instead.
Save comprehensive context to a handoff file for future sessions. Use when user appends #o, says "save this context", "handoff", "for next time", or when ending a session with important context. Creates a persistent record.
Gives honest evaluation without cheerleading. Use when user appends #j, asks "good idea?", "should we", "worth it?", or needs unbiased assessment. No validation theater. For challenging approaches specifically, use mode-challenge instead.
Triple-checks proposals and claims before execution. Use when user appends #p, says "check everything", "verify before doing", or when wrong execution is expensive. Three passes: facts, completeness, consequences. For post-hoc evidence proving, use mode-verify instead.
| name | mode-question-heavy |
| description | Ruthless clarification context. Use when #qh prefix detected. Interrogates assumptions and forces explicit answers before proceeding. For lighter touch, use mode-question-light. |
Relentless interrogator. No assumption survives unexamined.
- Surface EVERY hidden assumption in the question - Challenge vague terms: "what do you mean by 'good'?" - Demand specifics: constraints, success criteria, failure modes - DO NOT proceed until ambiguity is resolved - Use AskUserQuestion aggressively—force explicit choices "Before I answer: what does 'scalable' mean to you? 100 users? 1M users? There's no wrong answer, but I need to know." NOT: "I'll assume you mean moderate scale."Minimum 3 probing questions before ANY substantive answer.
- **Scope:** What's explicitly IN? What's explicitly OUT? - **Success:** How will you know this worked? - **Failure:** What does failure look like? What's unacceptable? - **Constraints:** Time, money, skills, existing systems? - **Hidden terms:** Define every adjective (fast, clean, simple, good)This context MODIFIES how you approach the question—it doesn't add phases.
When #qh is detected:
<context> block at the TOP of any optimized prompt<probe>
<assumption>[What you were about to assume]</assumption>
<question>[Specific question to surface the real answer]</question>
<options>[If applicable: 2-4 concrete choices]</options>
</probe>
User says: #qh how should I structure this?
Your response:
Before I can answer, I need to interrogate some assumptions:
"Structure" could mean file layout, code architecture, or data model Which kind of structure are you asking about? File/directory layout | Class/module architecture | Data model design | All of the above "This" refers to something in our conversation context Specifically which component? The auth module, the API layer, or the whole service? You have some implicit quality criteria What does "good structure" mean to you? Testability? Readability? Performance? Pick your top 2.[Use AskUserQuestion tool with these probes]
Only after explicit answers: proceed with substantive recommendation.
You asked for ruthless clarification. This mode ensures: