ワンクリックで
paper-reading-assistant
AI-assisted paper reading, PDF Q&A, and summarization workflows
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
AI-assisted paper reading, PDF Q&A, and summarization workflows
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
Route empirical-research requests through the Auto-Empirical Research Skills catalog when this whole repository is installed as one skill in Codex, CodeBuddy, Claude Code, or another IDE. Use to choose and load the right vendored AERS skill for causal inference, econometrics, replication, data acquisition, manuscript writing, peer review and referee responses, citation checking, de-AIGC editing, or full empirical-paper workflows without reading the entire repository at once.
公司金融实证研究的"漏斗式选题查找器"。互动开场先后询问 (1) 研究方向、(2) 候选标题数量 N, 再扫描全球文献(已出版英文学术期刊 + SSRN working paper + 全球高校 department seminar 1 年内日程),基于 Edmans (2024) "1000 Rejections" 红线生成 N 个候选标题,**通过并行 subagent(Agent 工具)批量生成计划书 + 查新;每个 subagent 必须强制调用 Skill 工具加载 econfin-proposal 与 novelty-check 两个预设 skill 完成各自模块**,**只有当 novelty score >= 9 时(即 JF/JFE/RFS 顶刊层次),subagent 才把 proposal + 查新报告合并的 md 写入 F:\Dropbox\CC\选题大全\<研究方向短名>\(以"简短选题名称-分数"命名,子文件夹名由 Step 0 从用户输入的研究方向派生);< 9 分的选题在 subagent 内部直接丢弃,绝不写盘、绝不输出**。当用户说"找选题"、"帮我找选题"、"想做 X 方向"、 "empirical CF idea search"、"批量生成研究计划书"、"100 ideas"、"econfin-idea-finder" 时触发。
Create and compile beautiful Beamer presentations following the Rhetoric of Decks philosophy. Use when making slides, creating decks, or compiling .tex presentation files.
Scaffold a new research project with standard directory structure, CLAUDE.md template, and documented README. Use this at the start of every new project to ensure consistent organization.
Download, split, and deeply read academic PDFs. Use when asked to read, review, or summarize an academic paper. Splits PDFs into 4-page chunks, reads them in small batches, and produces structured reading notes — avoiding context window crashes and shallow comprehension.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a slash command", "add a command", "write a custom command", "define command arguments", "use command frontmatter", "organize commands", "create command with file references", "interactive command", "use AskUserQuestion in command", or needs guidance on slash command structure, YAML frontmatter fields, dynamic arguments, bash execution in commands, user interaction patterns, or command development best practices for Claude Code.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | paper-reading-assistant |
| description | AI-assisted paper reading, PDF Q&A, and summarization workflows |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"📖","category":"research","subcategory":"paper-review","keywords":["paper reading assistant","PDF Q&A","document understanding","paper summarization"],"source":"wentor-research-plugins"}} |
Systematic workflows for reading, annotating, and extracting insights from academic papers, including AI-assisted summarization and critical analysis techniques.
Srinivasan Keshav's three-pass approach provides a structured way to read papers at increasing depth:
Read only:
After Pass 1, you should know:
Decision: Stop here if the paper is not relevant, or continue to Pass 2.
Read the full paper, but skip proofs and complex derivations:
After Pass 2, you should be able to:
For papers you need to deeply understand:
Use a consistent template for every paper you read:
# Paper Notes: [Short Title]
## Metadata
- **Title**: Full title
- **Authors**: First Author et al. (Year)
- **Venue**: Conference/Journal
- **DOI/URL**: link
- **Date read**: YYYY-MM-DD
## Summary (2-3 sentences)
What does this paper do, and what are the main findings?
## Problem
What problem does this paper address? Why is it important?
## Method
How do they approach the problem? Key technical details.
## Key Results
- Result 1: ...
- Result 2: ...
- Result 3: ...
## Strengths
- Strength 1: ...
- Strength 2: ...
## Weaknesses / Limitations
- Weakness 1: ...
- Weakness 2: ...
## Questions / Things I Don't Understand
- Question 1: ...
## Relevance to My Work
How does this connect to my research? What can I use?
## Key References to Follow Up
- [Author, Year] - Why it seems relevant
Use structured prompts to extract specific information from papers:
# Prompt template for paper summarization
summarize_prompt = """Read the following academic paper and provide:
1. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARY: The core contribution in a single sentence.
2. KEY FINDINGS (3-5 bullet points):
- Finding 1 with specific numbers/results
- Finding 2 ...
3. METHODOLOGY: Describe the approach in 2-3 sentences.
4. LIMITATIONS: List 2-3 limitations acknowledged or unacknowledged.
5. RELEVANCE: How does this relate to [your research topic]?
Paper text:
{paper_text}
"""
# Prompt for critical analysis
critique_prompt = """Analyze the following paper critically:
1. VALIDITY: Are the experimental design and statistical analyses sound?
Identify any threats to internal/external validity.
2. NOVELTY: What is genuinely new? What is incremental?
3. REPRODUCIBILITY: Could you replicate this study from the description given?
What information is missing?
4. ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS: Are there alternative interpretations
of the results that the authors do not consider?
5. FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS: What would you want to investigate next?
Paper text:
{paper_text}
"""
import fitz # PyMuPDF
def extract_paper_text(pdf_path):
"""Extract structured text from an academic paper PDF."""
doc = fitz.open(pdf_path)
sections = []
current_section = {"heading": "Preamble", "text": ""}
for page_num, page in enumerate(doc):
blocks = page.get_text("dict")["blocks"]
for block in blocks:
if "lines" not in block:
continue
for line in block["lines"]:
text = "".join(span["text"] for span in line["spans"])
font_size = max(span["size"] for span in line["spans"])
is_bold = any("Bold" in span.get("font", "") for span in line["spans"])
# Heuristic: detect section headings
if is_bold and font_size > 11 and len(text.strip()) < 80:
if current_section["text"].strip():
sections.append(current_section)
current_section = {"heading": text.strip(), "text": ""}
else:
current_section["text"] += text + " "
if current_section["text"].strip():
sections.append(current_section)
doc.close()
return sections
# Extract and display
sections = extract_paper_text("paper.pdf")
for s in sections:
print(f"\n## {s['heading']}")
print(s['text'][:200] + "...")
import os
import json
def process_paper_batch(pdf_dir, output_file):
"""Process a batch of papers and save structured notes."""
results = []
for filename in os.listdir(pdf_dir):
if not filename.endswith(".pdf"):
continue
pdf_path = os.path.join(pdf_dir, filename)
sections = extract_paper_text(pdf_path)
# Find title (usually first bold text or first line)
title = sections[0]["heading"] if sections else filename
# Find abstract
abstract = ""
for s in sections:
if "abstract" in s["heading"].lower():
abstract = s["text"].strip()
break
results.append({
"filename": filename,
"title": title,
"abstract": abstract,
"num_sections": len(sections),
"total_chars": sum(len(s["text"]) for s in sections)
})
with open(output_file, "w") as f:
json.dump(results, f, indent=2)
return results
| Tool | Platform | Highlights | PDF Annotation | AI Features | Collaboration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zotero + ZotFile | All | Reference management + PDF | Yes | No (plugins available) | Group libraries |
| Paperpile | Web/Chrome | Google Docs integration | Yes | No | Shared folders |
| ReadCube Papers | All | Smart citations | Yes | Recommendations | Shared libraries |
| Semantic Reader | Web | AI-augmented reading | Yes | Inline explanations, TLDRs | No |
| Elicit | Web | AI paper search | No | Automated extraction | Tables |
| Scholarcy | Web | Flashcard summaries | Yes | Auto-summarization | No |
| Paper Type | Focus On | Time Budget |
|---|---|---|
| Seminal paper | Full three-pass reading, understand every detail | 3-4 hours |
| Survey/review | Section headings, taxonomy, open questions | 1-2 hours |
| Methods paper | Algorithm/procedure sections, pseudocode, evaluation | 1-2 hours |
| Results paper | Figures, tables, statistical tests, effect sizes | 30-60 min |
| Position paper | Arguments, assumptions, counterarguments | 30-60 min |
| Related work (peripheral) | Abstract + conclusion only (Pass 1) | 5-10 min |