ai-writing-detox

name	ai-writing-detox
description	Eliminate AI-generated writing patterns that erode reader trust. Activate when writing articles, documentation, press releases, or any content where AI patterns would undermine credibility. For journalists using AI assistance who need human-sounding output.
attribution	Adapted from jamditis/claude-skills-journalism (journalism-core/skills/ai-writing-detox) at 2097d218. Original author: Joe Amditis. MIT License.

AI writing detox

Good writing is invisible. If readers notice the writing style, it's distracting from the content. AI patterns are noticeable—they break trust.

Scope: the copywriting skill owns outlet voice and story packaging; this skill owns removing AI tells. Apply detox as a pass over drafted copy, not as a voice guide.

When to use

• Writing or editing any journalism content
• Creating press releases or media advisories
• Drafting documentation or reports
• Writing social media posts
• Reviewing any AI-assisted text before publication

Banned words (delete or replace)

Word	Why it's bad	Alternative
delve	AI signature word	explore, examine, look at
realm	Pretentious	area, field
tapestry	Purple prose	(delete entirely)
landscape	Corporate speak	situation, environment
leverage	Jargon	use
utilize	Jargon	use
robust	Meaningless	strong, reliable
seamless	Almost always false	smooth, easy
comprehensive	Rarely necessary	full, complete
cutting-edge	Cliché	modern, new
holistic	Corporate	complete, full
synergy	Corporate	(delete, rewrite)
paradigm	Overused	model, approach
empower	Vague	(be specific about what capability)
innovative	Empty praise	(describe what's new)
transformative	Hyperbolic	changed, improved
sophisticated	Vague filler	advanced, or describe what's complex
leveraging	Corporate jargon	using
ecosystem	Overused metaphor	system, environment
rich	(as modifier)	(delete or be specific)
over (for quantity)	AP rule (US house style; many European guides accept it)	more than

Banned phrases

Throat-clearing (delete entirely)

• "It's important to note that..."
• "In today's [X] landscape..."
• "Let's dive/delve into..."
• "Without further ado..."
• "In this article, we will..."
• "It's worth mentioning that..."
• "It goes without saying..."
• "As we all know..."

Empty hedges

• "To be fair..." / "To be honest..."
• "At the end of the day..."
• "When it comes to..."
• "In terms of..."
• "With respect to..."

AI enthusiasm

• "This is a game-changer"
• "...and that's a good thing!"
• "Here's the thing:"
• "...and that's okay!"
• "...and I'm here for it"

Corporate buzzwords

• "Moving forward..."
• "Going forward..."
• "At this point in time..."
• "Due to the fact that..."
• "In order to..."

Banned structures

Don't start sentences with:

• "So," or "Well,"
• "Now," (when not about time)
• "Look," or "Listen,"
• "Basically," or "Essentially,"

Don't end sentences with:

• "...right?"
• "...you know?"
• "...if you will"

The substitution table

If you wrote	Write instead
utilize	use
facilitate	help
implement	build, add, create
leverage	use
functionality	feature
methodology	method
in order to	to
due to the fact that	because
at this point in time	now
a large number of	many
in the event that	if
prior to	before
subsequent to	after
in close proximity to	near
has the ability to	can

Case sensitivity

Always use sentence case for headings, not title case. (AP/US convention — follow your outlet's style guide.)

Wrong	Right
Getting Started With Your Project	Getting started with your project
How To Use The Tool	How to use the tool
Best Practices For Journalism	Best practices for journalism

Journalism-specific patterns to avoid

"Not just X—it's Y" pattern

Avoid: "This isn't just a news story—it's a wake-up call" Avoid: "This wasn't just a press conference—it was a turning point"

Do instead: State the thing directly without dramatic framing

"Fundamentally transforms" pattern

Avoid: "This fundamentally transforms how newsrooms operate" Avoid: "This represents a fundamental shift in journalism"

Do instead: Describe the actual change without hyperbole

Inflated claims in reporting

Avoid: "A bombshell revelation" Avoid: "A major milestone" Avoid: "A groundbreaking investigation"

Do instead: Let the facts speak. Readers judge significance.

Empty transitions

Avoid: "With that in mind..." Avoid: "Building on this foundation..." Avoid: "Taking this a step further..."

Do instead: Just make the next point

"It's not about X, it's about Y" pattern

Avoid: "It's not about the technology, it's about the people" Avoid: "This isn't about clicks. It's about trust."

Do instead: State the actual point without rhetorical setup. The X-not-Y construction is the dominant 2025-2026 ChatGPT/Claude rhetorical signature.

Em-dash overuse between independent clauses

Avoid: "The vote was close — only three council members opposed it — but the measure passed." Avoid: "Reporters arrived early — the press conference was already underway."

Do instead: Use commas, periods, or semicolons. Em-dashes are fine in moderation; reflexive use across every paragraph is a tell.

"The reality is..." / "The truth is..." openers

Avoid: "The reality is, most newsrooms can't afford this." Avoid: "The truth is, readers don't trust anonymous sources."

Do instead: Just state the claim. The opener adds words and signals AI-generated framing.

Tricolon abuse (reflexive three-item lists)

Avoid: "Clear, concise, and compelling reporting." Avoid: "Trust is built through accuracy, transparency, and consistency."

Do instead: Use one or two specific points. Three-item parallel lists are an AI rhythm pattern that reads as filler when used reflexively.

Before and after examples

Example 1: General prose

AI slop:

In today's rapidly evolving media landscape, it's crucial to understand the multifaceted nature of AI tools. Let's delve into how these robust solutions can help journalists leverage cutting-edge technology.

Human writing:

AI tools do three things well: drafting, research, and analysis. Here's when to use each.

Example 2: News lede

AI slop:

The city council meeting was a comprehensive and transformative discussion that fundamentally addressed key issues affecting residents in a meaningful way.

Human writing:

The city council voted 5-2 Tuesday to raise property taxes by 3 percent.

Example 3: Feature intro

AI slop:

In the rich tapestry of American journalism, few stories are as compelling as the one about to unfold. This isn't just a profile—it's a journey into the heart of what makes local news truly matter.

Human writing:

Maria Rodriguez has published a newspaper for 47 years. She's never missed an issue.

Example 4: Analysis piece

AI slop:

Moving forward, stakeholders must leverage innovative approaches to navigate the challenging landscape of digital transformation in the journalism ecosystem.

Human writing:

Local papers that want to survive need to find digital revenue. Most haven't.

The verbal tic test

Read your text aloud. Does it sound like:

• A TED talk introduction? Rewrite.
• A LinkedIn post? Rewrite.
• A press release? Rewrite.
• Corporate communications? Rewrite.
• How you'd explain it to a colleague? Keep it.

Quick self-check before publishing

Search your text for:

1. "delve" → delete or replace
2. "landscape" → delete or replace
3. "crucial" → is it actually crucial?
4. "robust" → what does this mean here?
5. "leverage" → just say "use"
6. "comprehensive" → is this word doing any work?
7. Starting "So," → delete

Found any? Your writing needs another pass.

Red flags in technical/analysis writing

1. Lists of near-synonyms: "comprehensive, sophisticated, and robust" (pick one or none)
2. Excessive hedging: "may potentially be able to possibly..."
3. Noun stacking: "production-ready deployment system infrastructure"
4. Passive voice hiding agency: "It was determined that..." (by whom?)
5. Circular definitions: "The system enables users to use the functionality"

The ultimate test

Before accepting any AI-assisted text, ask:

1. Can I delete this word/phrase without losing meaning? → Delete it
2. Is this the simplest way to say this? → Simplify
3. Would I say this out loud to a colleague? → If not, rewrite
4. Does this add information or just sound impressive? → If the latter, cut it

If readers think "AI wrote this," you've already lost their trust.

---

Good writing is invisible. If readers notice the writing, it's getting in the way of the content.

Optional (Claude Code only): the upstream repo ships an automated companion hook, hooks/ai-slop-detector.md. Goose does not support hooks; Mycroft users can ignore this.

Credits

Adapted from claude-skills-journalism by Joe Amditis, released under MIT License. Vendored at 2097d218 with localization and integration edits.