メニュー
Review a pull request or branch diff with structured quality analysis
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Guided git commit workflow — review changes, draft message, stage, commit
Manage context pressure during large codebase work without losing critical state.
Create a pull request with structured summary and test plan
Interactive debugging — reproduce, isolate, trace, fix
Explore a codebase or directory to understand its structure and purpose
Implement a requested code change end-to-end with scoped edits and verification.
| name | review-pr |
| description | Review a pull request or branch diff with structured quality analysis |
| when_to_use | When reviewing code changes, pull requests, or branch diffs |
| required_tools | ["bash","symbol_search"] |
| tags | ["review","quality"] |
| activation | {"input_patterns":["(?i)(review.*(pr|pull|merge|branch|diff)|pr.*review|代码审查)"]} |
${ARGS}
Identify the changes: git diff against the base branch. Understand size and nature. Read the PR description or commit messages for stated intent. If multiple commits, review ALL of them — the full scope, not just the latest.
For each changed file: does the change match stated intent? Are there unrelated modifications mixed in? Is the change complete, or are TODO/FIXME markers left behind?
Probe correctness: logic errors, off-by-one, null/undefined handling, edge cases without test coverage, concurrency issues if applicable. Check security: input validation, injection vectors, credential exposure.
Assess quality: naming clarity, abstraction level, separation of concerns. Are failures surfaced or swallowed? Unnecessary allocations, N+1 queries, missing indexes? Does the change follow existing codebase conventions?
Per finding: File:Line | Severity (critical / warning / nit) | Issue | Suggestion
Summary verdict: approve / request changes / block. State what was done well, not only what needs work.
