メニュー
Use when the user wants a security review of code or a diff — OWASP/CWE findings with severity, taint/data-flow analysis, and concrete fixes via security_review
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | audit |
| description | Use when the user wants a security review of code or a diff — OWASP/CWE findings with severity, taint/data-flow analysis, and concrete fixes via security_review |
| user-invocable | true |
Run a dedicated security audit with the security_review tool — it carries an attacker mental model (taint/data-flow, OWASP/CWE), not a generic code review.
git diff) to check changed code only, or code / files for a whole component.language/framework, and context for the trust boundaries (e.g. "public internet-facing API", "internal service behind VPN", "handles untrusted uploads").standard: owasp, cwe, or both (default).security_review({ code | diff | files, language?, context?, standard? }).For code you are authorized to review. Requires OPENROUTER_API_KEY. If the tool returns its missing-key error, relay it and suggest /setup.
Use when the user wants tests generated for code or a diff — enumerates edge cases and failure modes first, then emits runnable test code via testgen
Use when a task would benefit from a structured thinking technique but you're not sure which — recommends the right prompt technique for the intent (debug, spec, refactor, decision, design) and applies it
Use for decisions or judgments worth multiple independent perspectives — multi-model council with parallel analysis, search grounding, and synthesis (30-60s); for a quick single-call verdict use the jury tool directly
Use when the user shares or finishes a plan and wants it stress-tested before execution — adversarial multi-model pre-mortem with ranked risks, mitigations, and concrete plan edits
Use when code changes are ready for review — a diff exists, the user says "review my changes/PR", or a commit is about to happen. Multi-model diff review (Kimi, DeepSeek, GPT-5.5 panel + Gemini judge) with a MERGEABLE verdict
Use when TachiBot tools seem missing, a provider isn't working, or the user asks to set up/configure TachiBot or its API keys — runs doctor and walks through fixing the gaps