メニュー
[Code Quality] Evaluates risk level of proposed refactoring changes. Use to assess dependencies, blast radius, rollback difficulty, and determine if changes are safe to proceed.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
[Utility] Analyzes user prompts and efficiently loads only relevant rule documents. Auto-generates category-document mapping config file on first invocation by scanning project documents. Supports both automatic and manual invocation. (project)
[Dev] Extracts and organizes best practices for a given topic into a minimal tree structure (max depth 3, max 5 children per node). Use during task planning when writing subtasks in Docs/{name}_Task.md - output is added under each subtask as a concise reference guide. Pure reasoning task with strict formatting rules: keywords/noun phrases only, no prose. (project)
[Utility] Analyzes user prompts and efficiently loads only relevant rule documents. Auto-generates category-document mapping config file on first invocation by scanning project documents. Supports both automatic and manual invocation. (project)
[Design System] Quantitative accessibility audit for UI - contrast ratios, font sizes, tap targets, heading hierarchy. Use when (1) checking WCAG color contrast compliance, (2) auditing text sizes for readability, (3) validating touch/click target sizes, (4) reviewing heading structure and landmarks, (5) user asks to 'check accessibility', 'audit contrast', 'WCAG compliance', or 'a11y check'.
[Aesthetics] Positions aesthetics within art/design history, identifies what traditions it echoes, and spots clichés, generic trends, and AI-slop patterns to avoid. Outputs Critical Notes as Memo nodes in Brain canvas.
[Aesthetics] Maps aesthetic briefs to cultural references: art movements, photography, film, architecture, music, fashion. Outputs reference lists with visual language analysis. Organizes findings as Image and Memo nodes in Brain canvas.
| name | refactor-risk-assess |
| description | [Code Quality] Evaluates risk level of proposed refactoring changes. Use to assess dependencies, blast radius, rollback difficulty, and determine if changes are safe to proceed. |
Evaluate and mitigate risks before executing changes.
| Level | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| LOW | Single file, private methods | Rename local variable |
| MEDIUM | Multiple files, internal APIs | Extract helper class |
| HIGH | Public APIs, many dependents | Change interface signature |
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| LOW RISK | Git revert fixes everything |
| MEDIUM | Requires coordinated rollback |
| HIGH | Data migration, external deps |
| Coverage | Risk Impact |
|---|---|
| > 80% | Safe to proceed |
| 50-80% | Add tests first |
| < 50% | HIGH RISK |
PROCEED if: Test coverage adequate, Blast radius understood, Rollback plan exists BLOCK if: Critical path no tests, Public API change without review
