メニュー
Review EngiFoundry planning, Job work, code, documents, research, or other durable outputs in clean context and record pass, rework-required, or factual blocked conclusions.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Create or migrate the EngiFoundry project scaffold and create or modify its Executor and Workflow configuration through a controlled interactive flow.
Apply EngiFoundry automation preferences to verified-available PAK evidence, obtain acceptance when required, close delivery, or record rejected acceptance for rework.
Create a detailed human-readable document from EngiFoundry project records when the user explicitly requests documentation, a report, guide, specification, detailed summary, or handoff document.
Declare EngiFoundry Node Skill contracts, their project-state signals, records, responsibilities, and possible navigation destinations so the Agent can assemble the contracts needed for a request.
Classify new EngiFoundry work as direct Agent action, Package orchestration, or factually blocked before a Package exists. Use when deciding whether new work needs Orch.
Execute ready EngiFoundry Jobs in dependency order, apply configured Executor fallback, enforce engineering discipline, and record concise results. Use for implementation or rework of an existing ready PAK.
| name | engifoundry-review |
| description | Review EngiFoundry planning, Job work, code, documents, research, or other durable outputs in clean context and record pass, rework-required, or factual blocked conclusions. |
Reviewer selection is capability-driven and independent of executorOrder. The Agent arranging Review establishes a fresh context through an exposed host subagent, new-session, or CLI capability. A candidate is eligible only when it can inspect the complete primary subject and evidence, perform every required check with verified available tools, and start without receiving implementation discussion or an intended conclusion. It must not have performed the reviewed work.
Prefer a host-native isolated subagent when it is sufficient. Otherwise choose a verified new-session or CLI mechanism. Among equally capable candidates, prefer a mechanism independent from the producer, then the lower-overhead candidate. The same model is acceptable when the context is genuinely fresh.
Fallback is valid only for objective unavailability before a valid conclusion exists. pass and rework-required are conclusions, not selection failures; never repeat Review with another candidate to seek a preferred result. A new Review requires a changed subject, an invalid prior attempt, or an explicit multiple-Review requirement.
When no eligible fresh-context mechanism is actually available after inspecting host capabilities, Review is unavailable. Record that objective fact in the subject state; do not fabricate a Review attempt or reuse the producing context.
Read ./engifoundry.config.json, the project-owned workspace guide, contracts.md, the complete subject, its applicable requirements and contracts, and the evidence needed to assess it. Do not rely on handback summaries when primary evidence is available.
Inspect every applicable concern:
Order findings by impact and tie each to evidence. After rework, review the complete current subject again; never perform a delta-only approval.
The Reviewer Agent records exactly one conclusion:
pass: no actionable factual defect remains.rework-required: at least one correctable subject or contract finding exists.blocked: an objective condition prevents Review itself from reaching a conclusion and no valid alternative evidence exists.A missing output, failed check, incorrect content, contract conflict, or insufficient evidence is rework-required, not blocked. Never use blocked for uncertainty, difficulty, preference, or work the producing Agent can correct.
For every actual Review attempt, the Reviewer Agent writes one new immutable Review record and updates the subject's reviewRef when it has one. Never overwrite an earlier attempt.
ready means the current planning subject has a clean-context pass and no newer invalidating fact. rework-required means a current finding remains. blocked means Review itself is factually unavailable.pending-review with a pass reviewRef means Review is complete but Exec completion or approval facts are not yet recorded. rework-required and blocked carry the matching current Review evidence.The Reviewer Agent records findings and applicable state facts. It does not repair the reviewed subject, change its contract, accept delivery, or continue unrelated work.