メニュー
Use for review, PR review, audit, self-review, and regression-risk work. Prioritizes bugs, regressions, missing tests, architecture drift, redundancy, security risk, and verification gaps.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when the user asks for best practices, broader validation, GitHub/open-source comparison, official-doc verification, or warns against one-sided thinking. Also use before implementation when official API, framework, or project-pattern facts are needed to avoid rework.
Use before multi-file, unfamiliar, public-contract, or shared-behavior code changes to build a bounded impact set without reading the whole repository or editing from a single file view.
Route non-trivial coding work across target-state implementation, codebase impact, Superpowers, Context7, security review, PR workflow, and verification. Skip for tiny edits or simple reads.
Use before finalizing non-trivial design, architecture, configuration, or implementation decisions. Reduces sycophancy bias by independently evaluating proposals, surfacing risks, and presenting alternatives. Auto-triggers on design_or_config and complex_feature routes.
Use before architecture, configuration, workflow, dependency, or high-impact implementation decisions to align goals, constraints, options, tradeoffs, recommendation, acceptance criteria, and user confirmation. Skip for tiny obvious tasks.
Use for non-trivial code changes after the plan is confirmed. Enforces target-state implementation: minimal necessary scope, existing patterns, no avoidable MVP residue, no duplicate logic, synchronized callers/tests/types/errors/config, and verification.
| name | code-review |
| description | Use for review, PR review, audit, self-review, and regression-risk work. Prioritizes bugs, regressions, missing tests, architecture drift, redundancy, security risk, and verification gaps. |
Use Superpowers review workflows as the default methodology.
superpowers:requesting-code-review.superpowers:receiving-code-review.security-review.pr-workflow.Report findings first, ordered by severity. Focus on real bugs, regressions, security/privacy risks, broken contracts, missing tests, unnecessary complexity, duplicate logic, and target-state violations. If no issues are found, say so and mention remaining verification gaps.