メニュー
Challenge academic content with 5-7 specific pedagogical questions. Checks ordering, prerequisites, gaps, alternatives, notation conflicts, cognitive load, and standalone readiness. Works on slides, lecture notes, paper drafts, and assignments.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Build the T32 grant proposal as PDF and/or Word. Supports full build, Word-only, PDF-only, or single-section Word export for collaborator review.
Full grant review pipeline — runs compliance checker, study section reviewer, and proofreader on the T32 proposal. Aggregates all results into a single summary report.
Compile the LaTeX manuscript. Runs latexmk (or multi-pass pdflatex + biber) from the project root and reports errors, warnings, and undefined references.
Run holistic pedagogical review on teaching materials — slides, lecture notes, assignments, or syllabi. Checks narrative arc, prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and pacing.
Run the proofreading protocol on project files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files.
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, data.table conventions, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.
| name | devils-advocate |
| description | Challenge academic content with 5-7 specific pedagogical questions. Checks ordering, prerequisites, gaps, alternatives, notation conflicts, cognitive load, and standalone readiness. Works on slides, lecture notes, paper drafts, and assignments. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | [filename or topic description] |
Critically examine academic content (slides, notes, paper drafts, assignments) and challenge its design with 5-7 specific pedagogical questions.
Philosophy: "We arrive at the best possible presentation through active dialogue."
.claude/rules/ for notation conventions and narrative arcGenerate 5-7 challenges from these categories:
"Could students understand this better if we showed X before Y?"
"Do students have the background for this notation at this point?"
"Should we include an intuitive example before this formal proof?"
"Here are 2 other ways to visualize/present this concept."
"This symbol conflicts with earlier lecture usage."
"This slide has too many new symbols. Can we split?"
"If this becomes a book chapter, does this section stand alone?"
# Devil's Advocate: [Lecture Title]
## Challenges
### Challenge 1: [Category] — [Short title]
**Question:** [The specific pedagogical question]
**Why it matters:** [What could go wrong]
**Suggested resolution:** [Specific action]
**Slides affected:** [Numbers or titles]
**Severity:** [High / Medium / Low]
[Repeat for 5-7 challenges]
## Summary Verdict
**Strengths:** [2-3 things done well]
**Critical changes:** [0-2 changes before teaching]
**Suggested improvements:** [2-3 nice-to-have changes]