spectre-validate

name	spectre-validate
description	👻 | Comprehensive post implementation requirement validation using subagents
user-invocable	true

validate

Input Handling

Treat the current command arguments as this workflow's input. When invoked from a slash command, use the forwarded $ARGUMENTS value.

validate: Scope delivery verification and gap analysis

Description

• What — Validate implementation against scope/tasks docs, dispatch parallel subagents per area, produce single actionable gap remediation document.
• Approach — Primary agent chunks work by scope items or parent tasks, dispatches one @analyst per area IN PARALLEL. Each subagent validates their area including E2E UX accessibility.
• Outcome — Single validation_gaps.md with actionable tasks ready for immediate implementation.

Core Validation Principle

"Definition ≠ Connection ≠ Reachability"

Three levels of implementation completeness:

1. Defined: Code exists in a file
2. Connected: Code is imported/called by other code
3. Reachable: A user action can trigger the code path

Validation must verify all three levels. A feature with Level 1 but not Level 2 or 3 is NOT complete—it's dead code that happens to match the requirement description.

When verifying any implementation:

• Don't stop at "function X exists in file Y"
• Continue to "function X is called by Z at file:line"
• Continue to "Z is triggered when user does W"

ARGUMENTS Input

REQUIRED: User must provide scope documents to validate against.

<ARGUMENTS> $ARGUMENTS </ARGUMENTS>

Step (1/4) - Gather Validation Inputs

• Action — CheckArguments: Verify user provided scope documents.

  • If ARGUMENTS contains file paths or "use thread context" → proceed

  • Else → Immediately reply:

    "What should I validate against? Please provide:

    • Path to scope document (e.g., docs/tasks/main/scope.md)
    • Path to tasks document (e.g., docs/tasks/main/tasks.md)
    • Or say 'use thread context' to validate against our conversation"

  • Wait — User provides validation inputs

• Action — ReadScopeDocs: Read provided documents completely (no limits).

  • Extract all requirements, acceptance criteria, deliverables
  • Document scope boundaries (in-scope / out-of-scope)
  • Note constraints and success metrics

• Action — ChunkIntoValidationAreas: Break scope into discrete validation areas.

  • From tasks.md: Each parent task (e.g., [1.1], [1.2]) = one validation area
  • From scope.md: Each "In Scope" item = one validation area
  • From thread context: Each discussed feature/requirement = one validation area
  • Aim for 3-8 validation areas (merge small items, split large ones)

• Action — CreateValidationManifest: Document chunks before dispatch.

  Validation Areas:
  1. {Area Name} — {What to validate}
     - Source: {requirement text from scope doc}
     - Expected: {what should exist}
  2. ...
  

Step (2/4) - Dispatch Parallel Validation Agents

CRITICAL: Dispatch ALL validation agents in parallel in a SINGLE message with multiple Task tool calls. Do NOT dispatch sequentially.

• Action — DispatchValidators: Launch one @analyst per validation area IN PARALLEL.

  Subagent Prompt Template:

  You are validating scope delivery for ONE specific area.
  
  ## Context Documents
  - Scope: {path or "thread context"}
  - Tasks: {path if provided}
  - Branch: {branch_name}
  
  ## Your Validation Area
  **Area**: {area_name}
  **Source Requirement**: {exact text from scope/tasks doc}
  **Expected Deliverables**: {what should exist}
  
  ## Your Task
  1. Investigate YOUR SPECIFIC AREA only
  2. For each requirement, determine:
     - **Status**: ✅ Delivered | ⚠️ Partial | 🔌 Dead Code | ❌ Missing
       - ✅ **Delivered**: Defined AND connected AND reachable from user action
       - ⚠️ **Partial**: Code exists but has broken/missing connections
       - 🔌 **Dead Code**: Code exists but has zero usage sites
       - ❌ **Missing**: Code does not exist
     - **Evidence**: Must include BOTH:
       1. Definition site: `file:line` where code is defined
       2. Usage site: `file:line` where code is called/rendered
       - If you can only cite definition without usage → status is ⚠️ or 🔌
     - **Gap**: What's missing (if any)
  
  3. **CRITICAL - Reachability Verification**:
     - Trace the COMPLETE chain from user action to implementation:
       - Entry point: What user action triggers this? (click, route, event)
       - Call chain: How does execution flow to the implementation?
       - Terminal point: What side effect/UI change occurs?
     - A broken link at ANY point = ⚠️ NOT FULLY DELIVERED
     - For every function/component, grep for USAGE not just DEFINITION:
       - Functions: Search for `functionName(` to find invocations
       - Components: Search for `<ComponentName` to find render sites
       - Hooks: Search for `useHookName(` to find consumers
       - Props: Search for `propName={` to find where passed
     - Zero usage sites = 🔌 Dead Code
  
  4. **CRITICAL - Consumer-First Validation (Render-Backward Trace)**:
     For UI features, start from the FINAL RENDER and trace BACKWARDS:
     - What component renders the feature output? (exact JSX location)
     - What variable does that JSX use? (exact variable name)
     - Where does that variable come from? (hook, prop, computed value)
     - Trace back to the user action. Is every link connected?
  
     Example (filter feature):
     - Renders: `BoardColumn` receives `tasks` prop at line 45
     - Variable: `tasks` comes from `getFilteredTasksForBoard(board.id)`
     - Source: `getFilteredTasksForBoard` uses... `getTasksForBoard` from drag hook
     - ❌ BROKEN: This bypasses `displayTasks` from filter hook!
  
     If you can only trace forward (definition → usage) but NOT backward
     (render → source), you haven't verified the last mile.
  
  5. **CRITICAL - Dead Computation Detection**:
     List every computed value that is NOT directly consumed by a render:
     - For each hook return value, grep for where it's destructured/used
     - For each computed const, grep for where it's referenced
     - A value that's computed but never reaches JSX = 🔌 Dead Code
  
     Example:
     - `displayTasks` from `useKanbanFilters` → used where?
       - Passed to `TasksHeroHeader` ✓
       - Used in `getFilteredTasksForBoard`? ❌ NO — uses different source
     - Computed but not in render chain = BUG
  
  6. **Old Code Path Audit**:
     When new functionality replaces old patterns:
     - What OLD code handled this before? (imports, hooks, functions)
     - Is the old code still being called anywhere?
     - Are there duplicate data sources for the same concern?
     - If old path still active → ⚠️ Partial (new code bypassed)
  
  7. Check for scope creep: anything beyond the requirement
  
  ## Output Format
  

  AREA: {area_name} STATUS: {overall: Delivered | Partial | Dead Code | Missing}

  REQUIREMENTS:

  • [REQ-1] {requirement} Status: {✅|⚠️|🔌|❌} Definition: {file:line where defined} Usage: {file:line where called/rendered, or "NONE FOUND"} Reachability: {user action → ... → this code, or "NOT REACHABLE"} Render Chain: {JSX ← variable ← source ← user action, or "BROKEN AT {link}"} Gap: {what's missing} Remediation: {specific fix — what to wire, what to replace, what to add}
    • Produces: {what the fix outputs}
    • Consumed by: {what should use it}
    • Replaces: {old path to remove, or "N/A"}

  DEAD COMPUTATIONS:

  • {variable name} in {file}: computed but not consumed by render
    • Remediation: {wire to X, or delete if unnecessary}

  OLD CODE PATHS:

  • {old function/hook}: still active at {file:line}, bypasses new implementation
    • Remediation: {replace calls with new path, or remove}

  SCOPE CREEP: {any features beyond scope}

  SUMMARY: {1-2 sentences}

Verification Patterns for Subagents:

Checking	Search Pattern	Meaning
Function called	functionName\(	Invocation exists
Component renders	<ComponentName	JSX usage exists
Hook consumed	useHookName\(	Hook is used
Prop passed	propName={	Parent passes prop
Export imported	import.*Name	Module consumed

Common broken link patterns to check:

• Callback defined but never passed as prop
• Prop received but never used in component body
• Function exported but never imported elsewhere
• Type defined but never used in signatures
• Switch case exists but condition never triggers
• Hook returns value that's destructured but never used in JSX
• New data source created but old source still used in render
• Computed value stored in variable but render uses different variable
• Filter/transform function created but rendering bypasses it

Last-Mile Anti-Patterns (these cause "works in code, broken in UI"):

• displayTasks computed but getTasksForBoard called in render

• Handler created but onClick still points to old handler

• New hook created but component still imports old hook

• State updated correctly but wrong variable passed to child component

• Wait — All validation agents complete

Step (3/4) - Consolidate & Create Gap Remediation Tasks

• Action — ConsolidateFindings: Merge all subagent outputs.

  • Aggregate status across all areas
  • Compile gaps by priority (Critical/Medium/Low)
  • Note any scope creep findings

• Action — FinalWiringChecklist: Before marking any area complete, verify:

  Check	Question
  Consumer connected?	Does every new function/hook have a consumer that uses its output?
  Render chain complete?	Can you trace from JSX ← variable ← hook ← user action without breaks?
  Old paths removed?	If replacing old code, is the old path dead or redirected?
  No orphaned computation?	Is every computed value actually used in a render path?
  No duplicate sources?	Is there only ONE data source for each concern (not old + new)?

  CRITICAL: If any check fails for an area marked ✅, downgrade to ⚠️ and add gap task.

• Action — DetermineOutputDir:

  • branch_name=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo unknown)
  • If user specifies path → OUT_DIR={that value}
  • Else → OUT_DIR=docs/tasks/{branch_name}
  • mkdir -p "${OUT_DIR}/validation"

• Action — CreateValidationGapsDoc: Generate {OUT_DIR}/validation/validation_gaps.md.

  Document Structure:

  # Validation Gaps: {task_name}
  *Generated: {timestamp}*
  
  ## Summary
  - **Overall Status**: {Complete | Needs Work | Significant Gaps}
  - **Requirements**: {X of Y} delivered
  - **Gaps Found**: {count} requiring remediation
  - **Scope Creep**: {count} items (document or remove)
  
  ---
  
  ## Gap Remediation Tasks
  
  ### 📦 Phase 1: Critical Gaps
  
  #### 📋 [1.1] {Gap Title - e.g., "Connect auth flow to login page"}
  **Requirement**: {original requirement text}
  **Current State**: {what exists now — definition site if code exists}
  **Gap**: {what's missing — broken link in the chain}
  
  - [ ] **1.1.1** {Specific action - e.g., "Wire LoginButton onClick to auth handler"}
    - **Produces**: {output this creates — e.g., "onClick handler calling authService.login()"}
    - **Consumed by**: {what uses this — e.g., "LoginButton component render"}
    - **Replaces**: {old code path — e.g., "inline console.log in onClick" or "N/A"}
    - [ ] {Verifiable outcome 1}
    - [ ] {Verifiable outcome 2}
  
  - [ ] **1.1.2** {Specific action - e.g., "Add login route to app router"}
    - **Produces**: {output — e.g., "/login route rendering LoginPage"}
    - **Consumed by**: {consumer — e.g., "App router, navigated via authService redirect"}
    - [ ] {Verifiable outcome 1}
    - [ ] {Verifiable outcome 2}
  
  #### 📋 [1.2] {Next Gap Title}
  ...
  
  ### 📦 Phase 2: Medium Priority Gaps
  ...
  
  ### 📦 Phase 3: Low Priority / Polish
  ...
  
  ---
  
  ## Scope Creep Review
  Items implemented beyond original scope:
  - [ ] **{Feature}**: {Keep and document | Remove | Discuss}
    - Evidence: {file:line}
    - Recommendation: {action}
  
  ---
  
  ## Validation Coverage
  | Area | Status | Definition | Usage | Render Chain |
  |------|--------|------------|-------|--------------|
  | {area 1} | ✅ | {file:line} | {file:line} | JSX ← var ← source ✓ |
  | {area 2} | ⚠️ | {file:line} | {file:line} | Broken at {link} |
  | {area 3} | 🔌 | {file:line} | NONE | Dead computation |
  | {area 4} | ❌ | — | — | — |
  
  ## Dead Computations Found
  | Variable | File | Computed By | Should Be Consumed By |
  |----------|------|-------------|----------------------|
  | {displayTasks} | {useKanbanFilters.ts} | {applyTaskFilters} | {KanbanBoard render} |
  
  ## Old Code Paths Still Active
  | Old Path | Location | Should Be Replaced By | Impact |
  |----------|----------|----------------------|--------|
  | {getTasksForBoard} | {useKanbanDrag:45} | {displayTasks from useKanbanFilters} | Bypasses new filter |
  
  

Step (4/4) - Present Results

• Action — PresentResults: Show validation summary.

  Validation Complete

  **> Status: {Complete | Needs Work | Significant Gaps}

  • {X of Y} requirements delivered
  • {N} gaps requiring remediation
  • {N} scope creep items to review **> Gap Remediation Doc: {OUT_DIR}/validation/validation_gaps.md

  {1-2 sentence summary of key findings}

• Action — RenderFooter: Render Next Steps footer using Skill(spectre-guide) skill

Next Steps

See Skill(spectre) skill for footer format and command options.