メニュー
Use when providing responsible, non-executing education about prediction-market uncertainty, resolution rules, liquidity, source quality, and reasons to take no action.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Uppercase provided text locally for demo purposes.
Draft local content for user review without publishing or external account actions.
Produce a compact local summary draft from provided text.
Placeholder for a future read-only KnowledgeVault search adapter; no external search is enabled by default.
Produce a Prismtek/Buddy talking-host overlay for narrated videos using pixel-art visemes and FFmpeg audio RMS animation.
Use when monitoring public stock-market, crypto-market, macro, sports betting, and prediction-market discourse from X, YouTube, public data, and approved sources to create educational risk briefs, watchlists, content drafts, and manual-review decision packets without executing trades or bets.
| name | prediction-market-risk-education |
| description | Use when providing responsible, non-executing education about prediction-market uncertainty, resolution rules, liquidity, source quality, and reasons to take no action. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | Prismtek / Buddy-Hermes Skill Bridge |
| license | MIT |
| platforms | ["linux","macos","windows"] |
| metadata | {"hermes":{"tags":["prediction-markets","risk-education","resolution-rules","no-execution"],"related_skills":["sportsbook-risk-education","sports-model-risk-evaluator"]},"buddy":{"risk_class":"money","auto_executable":false,"requires_explicit_approval":true}} |
This skill helps Hermes and Buddy discuss prediction-market style questions in a non-executing way. It focuses on uncertainty, resolution-rule reading, source quality, liquidity awareness, and no-action reasoning.
It must not route orders, sign wallets, custody assets, transfer funds, use exchange credentials, or present financial activity as automated.
Use this skill when the user wants help reading market wording, comparing evidence quality, identifying ambiguous settlement criteria, or understanding why taking no action may be safer.
