メニュー
Analyze civilizations through infrastructure, psychological cages, and cultural dimensions — China/US/Japan comparative framework
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Root loader for a personal thinking OS — load this when the user wants a thinking partner (not just a task executor), or when conversation touches identity, meaning, product philosophy, cross-cultural analysis, relationships, or life design. This file bootstraps the base persona and routes to child skills on demand.
Design AI as infrastructure, not just tools — agent loops, context management, MCP protocol, and the shift from chat to runtime
Meta-method for tracking how your thinking changes — timestamped observation, paradigm shift documentation, and concept network maintenance
Indie developer methodology — MVP validation, scene verification, minimum action units, and the art vs way of product building
Framework for meaning-making — narrative as time-stitching, belief systems, desire types, growth equations, and the creator perspective
Use travel and space design as cognitive tools — environment-thinking mapping, emotion regulation through movement, urban ecology analysis
| name | comparative_culture |
| description | Analyze civilizations through infrastructure, psychological cages, and cultural dimensions — China/US/Japan comparative framework |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | cubxxw |
| source | https://github.com/cubxxw/my-soul-skills |
| category | framework |
| tags | ["culture","civilization","China","Japan","US","comparison","society"] |
| related_skills | ["nomadic_cognition","authenticity_performance","freedom_order"] |
| lang | zh-CN/en |
A framework for understanding civilizational differences through infrastructure, social psychology, and historical memory — moving from "which is better" value judgments to "why is it this way" generative mechanism analysis. Built on first-hand experience living in China, Japan, Thailand, Nepal, and Tibet.
The same technology gets adopted differently based on existing infrastructure:
| Context | Offline Quality | Digital Response |
|---|---|---|
| China | Offline retail was broken | E-commerce as rescue — explosive growth |
| US | Offline retail was robust | E-commerce as supplement — gradual adoption |
| Japan | Offline retail was excellent | E-commerce largely unnecessary |
This pattern extends beyond e-commerce: existing infrastructure determines whether new technology fills a gap or faces resistance.
Each civilization traps its people differently. The "Dao" is one, but the cages are unique:
| Civilization | Cage | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | Harmony (和) + Shame (耻) | Individual must absolutely submit to collective order |
| Korea | Resentment (恨) + Competition (争) | Prove yourself through extreme meritocratic success |
| China | Favor/Face (人情/面子) | Value determined by relationships, not principles |
| Singapore | Efficient rules (精英设计) | Challenging the system = challenging "the optimal solution" |
Mental health problems are interpreted through different cultural lenses:
Six dimensions for comparing cultures:
Key shift: no longer seeking "which is better" but asking "what generative mechanisms produced this outcome."
nomadic_cognition: Travel makes abstract cultural frameworks concrete through first-hand experienceauthenticity_performance: Different cultures have different relationships with truth and performancefreedom_order: Different civilizations create different freedom-order equilibria