メニュー
This skill should be used when the user asks to "turn these numbers into a narrative," "write up our performance for the board," or provides metrics or tracker results that need to become a readable, BLUF-structured narrative rather than a table of numbers.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent.
Engagement-profile interview that recommends and installs a starter pack of community strategy skills. This IS the practice setup for the whole ecosystem — it asks what kind of strategist you are and recommends what to install first. Use on fresh install, when the user says "get me started" or "what should I install", or to re-run the integration-availability check after adding or removing an MCP connector.
Install a community skill from a watched registry. Reads the allowlist first, fetches, shows the RAW SKILL.md (not just a summary), runs structural trust checks, runs skills-qa, and only writes files after explicit user approval. Use when the user says "install [skill]", picks install from browse, or provides a direct skill URL.
Evaluate a skill against the Strategy Skill Design Framework — thirteen design parameters (including trust-surface, freshness, schema validation, and conflict detection), three strategy-specific failure modes, and a three-band verdict (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns). Use when deciding whether to trust a community skill before installing it, before deploying a first-party skill to your team, or whenever the user asks "should I trust this?" or "is this skill well-designed?". Runs automatically as part of /strategy-builder-hub:skill-installer.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review our resource allocation," "are we funding the right things," "build a portfolio allocation view," or needs current spend, headcount, or management attention checked against strategic priority for misallocation.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "stress-test these synergies," "is this deal's synergy case realistic," or has a deal or partnership's projected synergies that need cost/revenue separation, evidence checks, and a base-rate haircut.
| name | performance-narrative |
| description | This skill should be used when the user asks to "turn these numbers into a narrative," "write up our performance for the board," or provides metrics or tracker results that need to become a readable, BLUF-structured narrative rather than a table of numbers. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep, Glob |
| metadata | {"version":"0.3.0","owner":"performance practice","review_cadence":"quarterly","work_shape":"narrative-synthesis","permission_tier":"advisory","output_class":"draft-for-review","sourcing_policy":"volatile-facts-must-be-sourced"} |
Turn metrics/tracker results into BLUF narrative for the audience in the practice profile — bottom line first, not metric-by-metric walkthrough.
[verify]./performance:tracker-builder.| Input | If missing |
|---|---|
| Metrics or tracker results | Ask user to provide |
| Practice profile (audience, cadence) | Use org default audiences; tag [PROVISIONAL] |
| Headline-worthy context | Ask what audience will act on |
Without audience in profile: default to sponsor/exec; tag [PROVISIONAL]; apply quiet mode for external-facing per plugin CLAUDE.md.
narrative-synthesis):
[verify].~~bi analytics, ~~spreadsheet, ~~crm, or other MCP sources, tag each number [sourced: <connector>, <dataset/report>, <as-of date>] per ../../references/trust-conventions.md. Uncited connector figures are not allowed in board-facing output; use [verify] or INPUT NEEDED when the pull fails.CONFIDENCE: [defensible recommendation | structured first pass]
HEADLINE: [bottom line]
WHY:
1. [supporting point]
2. [supporting point]
WHAT'S NEEDED: [decision/investment/awareness-only]
FULL DETAIL:
[metric-by-metric breakdown for reference]
Input: Conversion down 8%; mid-tier price change; board audience.
Expected output (excerpt):
HEADLINE: Conversion fell 8% this month, driven almost entirely by the mid-tier price change [sourced: tracker].
WHAT'S NEEDED: Decision whether to revert price test or accept conversion hit for margin gain [review]
When a stable convention surfaces during this run (thresholds, naming, tone, output format, or recurring corrections), propose a profile update: show the exact diff against ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-strategy/performance/CLAUDE.md (org-wide facts go to org-profile.md), ask for confirmation, and write only on yes. Only /performance:practice-setup auto-applies a full profile write.
Follows plugin CLAUDE.md § Outputs. Next: finance validation, deeper dive on flagged metric, or exec decision on what's-needed.