メニュー
Open or draft a GitHub issue from available architecture, review, repo, and user context. Uses prior artifacts when present but can synthesize a durable contract directly from the current task.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | issue |
| description | Open or draft a GitHub issue from available architecture, review, repo, and user context. Uses prior artifacts when present but can synthesize a durable contract directly from the current task. |
Read the shared contracts before output: ../_shared/operator-output.md, ../_shared/attention-budget.md, ../_shared/evidence-record.md, ../_shared/state.md, ../_shared/cognitive-load.md, ../_shared/collaboration.md, ../_shared/ascii-diagrams.md.
Create a durable implementation contract with enough context for /work to proceed without rereading chat.
.context/architecture.md, .context/review.md, current user request, repo evidence, or an existing issue/PR. Missing prior artifacts are not blockers.
Available .context/ artifacts, repo files/tests, prior issues when relevant, and REFERENCE.md only when issue structure needs examples.
.context/issue.md.context/session-state.md/architect or /review as the next confidence step.Return the issue decision, issue URL/number or draft path, up to three evidence bullets, risk, and next action. Suggest /work when implementation can start; suggest /review when unresolved design risk remains.
Stop if the issue would encode a product decision the user has not made, or if GitHub access/authentication fails.
Apply Emil Kowalski-style UI polish: interaction details, component feel, animation restraint, and invisible product quality. Uses progressive disclosure instead of long design essays.
Apply Emil Kowalski-style animation guidance for web interfaces: purposeful motion, correct easing, interruptibility, performance, reduced motion, and interaction feel.
Implement the requested change on the current branch using the best available contract: issue, architecture, user request, or repo evidence. Does not require /architect or /review to have run. Hands naturally to /test.
Triage and address PR review comments. Uses available issue/architecture/context when present, keeps evidence in .context/address.md, and does not require prior workflow phases.
Derive the smallest correct architecture from user intent, repo facts, and available workflow evidence. Writes the full architecture to .context/architecture.md and returns only the decision, tradeoff, risk, and next action.
Review the current PR for correctness, tests, maintainability, security, standards, and prior-findings risk. Keeps reviewer detail in .context/code-review.md and posts concise actionable GitHub review comments.