メニュー
Pressure-test a proposed architecture, issue, PR intent, or inferred design. Writes detailed findings to .context/review.md and returns LOCKED or NOT LOCKED with blockers only.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | review |
| description | Pressure-test a proposed architecture, issue, PR intent, or inferred design. Writes detailed findings to .context/review.md and returns LOCKED or NOT LOCKED with blockers only. |
Read the shared contracts before output: ../_shared/operator-output.md, ../_shared/attention-budget.md, ../_shared/evidence-record.md, ../_shared/state.md, ../_shared/cognitive-load.md, ../_shared/collaboration.md.
Catch design errors before they become implementation cost.
.context/architecture.md, a GitHub issue, PR body, user proposal, or inferred design from current code. Missing architecture artifacts are not blockers; reconstruct the design from available context and label inferred claims.
Architecture evidence, repo code/tests, dependency docs/source when referenced, git history and prior learnings when relevant.
.context/review.md.context/session-state.mdblocking, important, or minor..context/review.md.LOCKED only when no blocking issue remains and important issues are fixed or accepted as explicit tradeoffs.Return LOCKED or NOT LOCKED, up to three evidence bullets, the highest remaining risk, the evidence path, and the next natural action. Do not restate the full architecture in chat.
Stop when the lock decision is clear, or when a missing product/risk decision prevents judging the design.
Apply Emil Kowalski-style UI polish: interaction details, component feel, animation restraint, and invisible product quality. Uses progressive disclosure instead of long design essays.
Apply Emil Kowalski-style animation guidance for web interfaces: purposeful motion, correct easing, interruptibility, performance, reduced motion, and interaction feel.
Implement the requested change on the current branch using the best available contract: issue, architecture, user request, or repo evidence. Does not require /architect or /review to have run. Hands naturally to /test.
Triage and address PR review comments. Uses available issue/architecture/context when present, keeps evidence in .context/address.md, and does not require prior workflow phases.
Derive the smallest correct architecture from user intent, repo facts, and available workflow evidence. Writes the full architecture to .context/architecture.md and returns only the decision, tradeoff, risk, and next action.
Review the current PR for correctness, tests, maintainability, security, standards, and prior-findings risk. Keeps reviewer detail in .context/code-review.md and posts concise actionable GitHub review comments.