ワンクリックで
parallel-agents
Use only when the user explicitly wants delegation, subagents, or parallel task decomposition across independent workstreams.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Use only when the user explicitly wants delegation, subagents, or parallel task decomposition across independent workstreams.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use the Codex Kit CLI to initialize, update, or inspect a Codex-ready project scaffold in the current workspace.
Use when a change may affect rollout, deployment, migrations, or operational stability and needs a higher-confidence validation pass.
Review patches, branches, or implementations for correctness, regressions, security, and missing tests. Use when the task is to inspect a diff or code change and identify concrete risks before merge.
Reproduce, isolate, and explain bugs before fixing them. Use when the task is about a bug, regression, failure, flaky behavior, unexpected output, or unclear runtime behavior that must be narrowed to a concrete cause.
Produce implementation plans that are decision-complete and execution-ready. Use when the task needs decomposition, sequencing, acceptance criteria, explicit assumptions, risk handling, or a concrete plan before coding or operational work starts.
Use when a bug is real but poorly scoped and you need a disciplined pass to reproduce it, bound it, and isolate the most likely root cause before fixing.
| name | parallel-agents |
| description | Use only when the user explicitly wants delegation, subagents, or parallel task decomposition across independent workstreams. |
Orchestration through Codex subagents and bounded parallel work
This skill enables coordinating multiple specialized subagents through Codex-native delegation. Unlike external orchestration scripts, this approach keeps planning, delegation, and synthesis inside the same Codex workflow.
✅ Good for:
❌ Not for:
Use the security_auditor subagent to review authentication
First, use the explorer subagent to discover project structure.
Then, use the backend_specialist subagent to review API endpoints.
Finally, use the test_writer subagent to identify test gaps.
Use the frontend_specialist subagent to analyze React components.
Based on those findings, have the test_writer subagent generate component tests.
Resume agent [agentId] and continue with additional requirements.
Agents: explorer → [domain-subagents] → synthesis
1. explorer: Map codebase structure
2. security_auditor: Security posture
3. backend_specialist: API quality
4. frontend_specialist: UI/UX patterns
5. test_writer: Test coverage
6. Synthesize all findings
Agents: affected-domain-subagents → test_writer
1. Identify affected domains (backend? frontend? both?)
2. Invoke relevant domain subagents
3. test_writer verifies changes
4. Synthesize recommendations
Agents: security_auditor → reviewer or backend_specialist → synthesis
1. security_auditor: Configuration and code review
2. reviewer or backend_specialist: Confirm impact in changed code paths
3. Synthesize with prioritized remediation
| Subagent | Expertise | Trigger Phrases |
|---|---|---|
planner | Planning | "plan", "roadmap", "milestones" |
explorer | Discovery | "explore", "map", "structure" |
security_auditor | Security | "security", "auth", "vulnerabilities" |
backend_specialist | Backend | "API", "server", "Node.js", "Express" |
frontend_specialist | Frontend | "React", "UI", "components", "Next.js" |
test_writer | Testing | "tests", "coverage", "TDD" |
devops_engineer | DevOps | "deploy", "CI/CD", "infrastructure" |
database_architect | Database | "schema", "Prisma", "migrations" |
mobile_developer | Mobile | "React Native", "Flutter", "mobile" |
debugger | Debugging | "bug", "error", "not working" |
documentation_writer | Documentation | "write docs", "create README", "generate API docs" |
performance_optimizer | Performance | "slow", "optimize", "profiling" |
seo_specialist | SEO | "SEO", "meta tags", "search ranking" |
reviewer | Review | "review", "regression", "correctness" |
docs_researcher | External docs | "docs", "API behavior", "framework docs" |
These can work alongside specialized subagents:
| Agent | Model | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Explore-like read-only agent | lightweight model | Fast read-only repository search |
| Planning-focused agent | reasoning-oriented model | Research during planning |
| General-purpose agent | coding model | Complex multi-step modifications |
Use generalist discovery for quick searches, and specialized subagents for domain-specific analysis or implementation.
After all agents complete, synthesize:
## Orchestration Synthesis
### Task Summary
[What was accomplished]
### Agent Contributions
| Agent | Finding |
|-------|---------|
| security_auditor | Found X |
| backend_specialist | Identified Y |
### Consolidated Recommendations
1. **Critical**: [Issue from Agent A]
2. **Important**: [Issue from Agent B]
3. **Nice-to-have**: [Enhancement from Agent C]
### Action Items
- [ ] Fix critical security issue
- [ ] Refactor API endpoint
- [ ] Add missing tests
test_writer or another validation-oriented subagent for code modifications when useful