implement
Implement a tightly scoped piece of work from the current conversation, an explicit request, or a spec file.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Implement a tightly scoped piece of work from the current conversation, an explicit request, or a spec file.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match the user's request, PRD, or explicit spec?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
Use when the user asks for a rich explanation of a code change, diff, branch, or PR. Produces HTML output.
Walk the user through the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) as a guided, interactive code tour — the live Neovim counterpart to the `explain-html` skill. Drives the user's Neovim (scroll, highlight, virtual-text annotations) when connected, and degrades to prose with file:line references otherwise. Advances one stop at a time and waits for the user to say "next". Use when the user wants to be walked through a diff/branch/PR, asks for a guided tour or walkthrough of changes, or says "tour since X" / "lead me through the changes".
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.
| name | implement |
| description | Implement a tightly scoped piece of work from the current conversation, an explicit request, or a spec file. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Implement the work described by the user in the current conversation, a directly supplied request, or an explicit spec file.
This repo does not use an agent-managed issue tracker as the default work-packaging layer. The human owns the roadmap and long-term work selection; the agent owns one tightly scoped task at a time.
CONTEXT.md, CONTEXT-MAP.md, ADRs) when they exist, so names and decisions match the repo./tdd where possible, at pre-agreed seams./code-review to review the work when the user wants a review pass..scratch/ only for temporary notes/specs when the user asks for a durable artifact or the task genuinely needs one./to-tasks; do not turn it into a ticket system.Do not commit. Leave changes staged or unstaged for the user to inspect.
If multiple commits would be advantageous, stop and explain the proposed split. Before doing any commit-oriented work, create a new branch from a clean slate: stash or otherwise clear unrelated work first, then branch. Never commit on main.