draft-strategy

name	draft-strategy
description	Use only when autopilot-draft dispatches document strategy and evidence-plan creation. Not for top-level user requests or primary capability routing.
argument-hint	<mode> --inputs <comma-separated-paths> --output <artifact-dir> [--intensity direct|quick|standard|strong|thorough|adversarial] <task description>
metadata	{"group":"sub","fam":"sub","invocation_class":"parent-invoked","modes":["rebuttal","paper","review","report","proposal","presentation"],"blurb":"Create an initial document strategy and evidence-based writing plan.","use_when":"Use only when autopilot-draft dispatches document strategy and evidence-plan creation.","not_for":"Not for top-level user requests or primary capability routing."}

draft-strategy

Language Rule

Follow an explicit target, venue, audience, or source-artifact language first. Otherwise, write strategy artifacts and user-facing output in the conversation language according to <agent-home>/roles/response-policy.md. Preserve quotations, code identifiers, citations, paths, and venue-specific terms when translation would reduce precision.

Parse Arguments

Parse $ARGUMENTS as follows:

• first word, mode: rebuttal | paper | review | report | proposal | presentation
• --inputs <comma-separated-paths>: pre-discovered artifact directories, usually analysis_project/{paper,doc}/... or research/{topic}/
• --output <dir>: <artifact-root>/documents/{date}_{name}/
• --intensity: derive the quick | light | standard | thorough | adversarial verification tier through CONVENTIONS §1.1
• remaining text: task description and context

Pre-Check

Verify the expected analysis files under {output_dir}/analysis/:

• every mode: material_index.md
• rebuttal: reviewer_analysis.md
• paper, review, report, proposal, or presentation: ref_analysis.md

If a required file is missing, report that autopilot-draft Step 1 did not complete; do not invent the analysis.

Mode Routing

Select one strategy template from the first argument:

Mode	Strategy focus
rebuttal	Meta-review, priority matrix, and reviewer-by-reviewer response
paper	Positioning, contribution, outline, and evidence
review	Evidence-grounded peer-review response
report	Objective, findings, and section plan
proposal	Problem, approach, work plan, and impact
presentation	Audience, core message, and slide outline

autopilot-draft maps its form-first paper, presentation, or doc route to these six labels during preflight. A doc request maps to rebuttal, review, report, or proposal from task intent, with report as the final fallback. A direct draft-strategy invocation must supply one of the six labels.

Read references/delegate-prompt.md for the complete mode mapping, six templates, paragraph-cohesion precheck, tone detection, slide conventions, and quality requirements.

Flow

1. Parse arguments and verify {output_dir}/analysis/.
2. Load the complete prompt from references/delegate-prompt.md and dispatch the research/research-survey unit. Require it to write the strategy file directly and return only paths plus a 3–5 line summary.
3. Apply QA scaling and the bounded quality/fact review in references/qa-review.md; run the selected reviewers in parallel and allow at most two rounds.
4. Create a translated companion only when an explicit second-language or external-audience contract requires it. Use the editorial/translate unit with references/mirror.md; do not infer a fixed mirror language from the conversation.
5. Report strategy paths, compact summary, and QA verdict in the conversation language.

Reference Index

File	Load when	Contents
references/delegate-prompt.md	Building the research/research-survey unit prompt	Inputs, paragraph-cohesion precheck, mode mapping, six strategy templates, tone detection, slide conventions, quality requirements, and return contract
references/qa-review.md	Selecting and running QA	Rigor scaling, fast fact-check rationale, reviewer and fact-checker prompts, verdict branches, and two-round cap
references/mirror.md	An explicit companion-language artifact is required	editorial/translate unit procedure, primary-language decision, and final report line

Task

$ARGUMENTS