メニュー
UX-focused design review examining visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, and user flow. Goes beyond code quality into design effectiveness.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Full accessibility audit covering focus management, semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, color contrast, touch targets, screen reader experience, and motion safety.
Auto-fix detectable accessibility issues. Adds focus styles, semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, and touch target sizing.
Verify visual alignment across sections. Check that headings, text, images, and components share consistent alignment points.
Add purposeful motion and transitions to the interface. Focuses on high-impact moments: page load reveals, hover states, and scroll-triggered entries. Not decorative jitter.
Audit and fix ARIA attributes. Ensures proper aria-label, aria-hidden, aria-live, and role usage throughout the interface.
Comprehensive design quality audit with severity ratings, specific line references, and actionable fix instructions. Deeper than /score — examines every declaration.
| name | critique |
| description | UX-focused design review examining visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, and user flow. Goes beyond code quality into design effectiveness. |
| user-invokable | true |
Evaluate the interface from a user experience perspective, beyond code quality.
Visual Hierarchy: Is it clear where to look first, second, third? Is there a single focal point? Do size, weight, color, and position work together or fight each other?
Information Architecture: Is content organized logically? Can users find what they need? Is the navigation clear? Are related items grouped?
Emotional Resonance: Does the design feel intentional? Does it match the brand's personality? Would a user trust this interface? Is there anything memorable?
User Flow: Are CTAs clear and prominent? Is the path from entry to action obvious? Are there dead ends? Is there cognitive overload?
Provide specific, actionable feedback organized by category. Reference specific elements. Suggest concrete improvements. Do not give vague praise — every statement must be either a specific problem or a specific strength.
