メニュー
Precise language for design feedback. Ban vague words. Name what you actually see. Use when giving design feedback, running critiques, or training teams to communicate about quality.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Build taste through volume of output, deliberate failure, and speed. Taste cannot be developed by watching. It's sharpened by making, failing, and making again. Use when designing practice routines, breaking through creative blocks, or helping someone move from analysis to execution.
Use taste as a competitive moat and business advantage. In the AI and vibe-coding era, execution is commoditized. Taste is the defensible edge. Use when advising founders on product differentiation, building product culture, evaluating why some products win despite fewer features, or understanding taste as a strategic asset.
Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.
Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.
| name | critique-vocabulary |
| description | Precise language for design feedback. Ban vague words. Name what you actually see. Use when giving design feedback, running critiques, or training teams to communicate about quality. |
Say exactly what you mean. Kill vague words.
/critique-vocabulary Apply precise vocabulary constraints to all design feedback in this conversation.| Instead of... | Use... |
|---|---|
| "It feels cluttered" | "The information density is high relative to the content hierarchy. Nothing signals where to start." |
| "It looks boring" | "The visual rhythm is flat. Every section has the same scale and spacing." |
| "Make it pop" | "The CTA doesn't have enough visual separation from surrounding elements." |
| "Something feels off" | "The spacing between these groups seems inconsistent. Is this relationship intentional?" |
| "It's not polished" | "The border radius is inconsistent between these elements." |
| "Explore other directions" | "The current approach prioritizes X. What happens if we prioritize Y instead?" |