Skip to main content
Manusで任意のスキルを実行
ワンクリックで
GitHub リポジトリ

agent-toolkit

agent-toolkit には eai-org から収集した 18 個の skills があり、リポジトリ単位の職業カバレッジとサイト内 skill 詳細ページを表示します。

収集済み skills
18
Stars
26
更新
2026-07-24
Forks
3
職業カバレッジ
5 件の職業カテゴリ · 100% 分類済み
リポジトリエクスプローラー

このリポジトリの skills

memory-doctor
その他コンピュータ職

Audit the current project's agent-memory and, block by block, relocate each entry into a user-controlled home (project doc/skill/rule or user-level skill/rule) or archive it — draining memory so nothing uncontrolled accumulates in the agent's context.

2026-07-24
use-conversational-language
テクニカルライター

How to write texts meant to be published by humans for other humans.

2026-07-23
fresh-eyes-review
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター

Fresh-eyes review of a changeset by a fresh-context agent — catches regressions and correctness issues the authoring context reads past.

2026-07-22
check-ticket-implementation
ソフトウェア開発者

Check how much of a ticket is already implemented — split it into requirement blocks, judge each against the code, and save a human-readable TICKET-STATUS report in the planning dir.

2026-07-20
compact-skill-creator
ソフトウェア開発者

Author or refine a skill for maximum token economy without losing intent. Use when creating any new skill or editing an existing `SKILL.md`.

2026-07-20
context-checkup
ソフトウェア開発者

Audit what auto-loads into an agent session's context window and suggest lean, reversible fixes to cut startup tokens.

2026-07-20
review-code-assistant
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター

Assist a human reviewing a pull request or branch locally — diff a source branch against its target (auto-detected or from a PR link) and return concise, human-voice review comments with file and line locations. Read-only, never posts.

2026-07-20
review-ticket
ソフトウェア開発者

Triage a ticket or ticket set before work starts — compare it against the codebase and save a review covering verdict, feature walkthrough, and only the high-cost questions worth raising.

2026-07-20
verify-understanding
ソフトウェア開発者

Verify the engineer is ready to implement a feature — a teach-back conversation over a .TICKET-REVIEW.md where they explain the feature in their own words and the agent probes and corrects.

2026-07-20
create-implementation-plan
ソフトウェア開発者

Turn a refined requirements document into a structured implementation PLAN.md a fresh session can execute. Planning only — decides the "how", not the "what". Invoke manually only.

2026-07-19
create-manual-test-instructions
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター

Turn a ticket or requirements document into a concise QA manual-test file a non-author can follow. Invoke manually only.

2026-07-19
fetch-pr-review
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター

Fetch all reviewer comments from a pull request URL (GitHub, Azure DevOps, …) and save them as a self-contained markdown PR-REVIEW file in the task's planning directory. Fetch only — no fixing or replying.

2026-07-19
fetch-ticket
ソフトウェア開発者

Fetch one or more tickets/issues from their tracker (Azure DevOps, Jira, GitHub, …) and save each as a self-contained markdown ticket file. Fetch only — no analysis or planning.

2026-07-19
refine-ticket
ソフトウェア開発者

Refine a development ticket — or brainstorm a raw idea — into a validated, self-contained REQUIREMENTS document — the "what", verified against the codebase. Invoke manually only.

2026-07-19
compact-docs-writer
編集者

Rewrite or refine a doc for maximum token economy without losing any rule or intent. Use for docs kept in version control and regularly re-read by agents; skip throwaway docs like plans.

2026-07-16
refine-pr-review
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター

Triage a fetched PR review with the user, comment by comment — address, partial, or push back — drafting each reply and producing a REQUIREMENTS file for the accepted code changes. Takes the PR-REVIEW file produced by fetch-pr-review. Invoke manually only.

2026-07-06
run-nx-checks
ソフトウェア開発者

Run nx format, lint, test, and build on affected or specified projects, then fix unambiguous failures

2026-07-04
self-improve
その他コンピュータ職

Capture durable user feedback into the governing skill/doc, or propose creating a new skill when no suitable one exists, so future sessions don't repeat the mistake. Use when the user rejects, reverts, or overrides the agent's output or approach on something a skill/doc covers or should cover, and when manually invoked to improve or create guidance.

2026-06-26