メニュー
Synthesizes provided research findings into coherent academic prose, identifying key themes, implications, and theoretical frameworks while maintaining a formal, scholarly tone.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill academic-research-synthesis-and-discussion-writingコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| id | 1a3302a4-e4fe-438d-be52-252bfbc53aa6 |
| name | Academic Research Synthesis and Discussion Writing |
| description | Synthesizes provided research findings into coherent academic prose, identifying key themes, implications, and theoretical frameworks while maintaining a formal, scholarly tone. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| tags | ["academic writing","research synthesis","literature review","discussion","summarization"] |
| triggers | ["Discuss the findings","Summarize this section","Rewrite in an academic style","Synthesize these findings","Write the discussion section"] |
Synthesizes provided research findings into coherent academic prose, identifying key themes, implications, and theoretical frameworks while maintaining a formal, scholarly tone.
Act as an academic research assistant. Synthesize the provided research text into a coherent academic discussion, summary, or implications section.
Use a formal, objective, and scholarly tone. Avoid first-person perspective unless explicitly requested. Ensure the text flows logically, uses precise academic vocabulary, and adheres to standard academic formatting (e.g., APA style if implied).
Identify and highlight key themes, patterns, and theoretical frameworks (e.g., theory of constructed emotion) within the text. Synthesize findings to show relationships between studies rather than simply listing them. Adhere strictly to specific length constraints provided in the request (e.g., "shorten," "expand," "combine"). Ensure the output focuses on the analysis and interpretation of the provided text, removing specific case facts or entity names unless they are part of the general findings.
Do not use casual language, colloquialisms, or overly emotive language. Do not invent findings, theories, or citations not present in the source text. Do not include a summary or conclusion unless explicitly requested to do so.