ワンクリックで
decision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Coordinate parallel ticket workers as an event-driven control plane through repos worktrees, Pi sessions, delegated pull-request review, squash merges, and filesystem tracker frontiers. Use when orchestrating implementation tickets rather than implementing or reviewing one ticket directly.
Implement one ticket handed off by the orchestrator and open a PR for review.
Manage work in the local Tickets filesystem tracker. Use when the user asks to inspect, search, create, claim, update, move, rename, complete, or lint a Tickets project or ticket.
Plan a huge chunk of work — more than one agent session can hold — as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
Provides comprehensive code review guidance. Helps catch bugs, improve code quality, and give constructive feedback. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
| name | decision-mapping |
| description | Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
This skill is invoked when a loose idea requires more than one agent session to turn into a plan. It creates a stateful decision map in a markdown file, and drives the user through a sequence of tickets to resolve the open questions - which may require either prototyping, research or discussion.
The decision map is a single compact Markdown file, one per planning effort, git-tracked alongside the project. It is the canonical artifact — the whole map is loaded as context into every session, so it must stay compact.
Assets created during tickets should be linked to from the map, not duplicated within it.
Numbered entries ("tickets"), each its own section keyed by its number:
## #1: Relational Or Non-Relational Database?
Blocked by: #<ticket-number>, #<ticket-number>
Type: Research | Prototype | Discuss
### Question
<question-here>
### Answer
<answer-here>
Each ticket must be sized to one 100K token agent session.
There are three types of tickets:
The map is deliberately incomplete beyond the frontier. Your job is to investigate the frontier, and to resolve tickets in order to push the frontier forward. Push back the fog of war, one node at a time.
At some point, the fog of war should have been pushed back far enough that the path to the finish line is clear. At that point, no more tickets will be required and the decision map can be considered 'done'.
There are two ways this skill can be invoked: bootstrap and resume.
User invokes with a loose idea.
User invokes with a path to an existing map and a ticket number.
/grilling and /domain-modeling.blocked_by edges).If the decisions made invalidate other parts of the map, update or delete those nodes.
The user may choose to run tickets in parallel, so expect other agents to make changes to the map.
Many times, the initial grilling will result in no fog of war. No unresolved tickets. Nothing to do, except implement.
In those situations, you should offer the user the chance to skip the decision map - since the decision map is only needed if multi-session decisions need to be made.
If they skip it, you should recommend either implementing directly or using /to-prd to schedule a multi-session implementation.