メニュー
Use when writing any prose — reports, commit messages, devlog entries, PR descriptions, documentation — to avoid the self-congratulatory "honest"/"frank"/"candid"/"transparent" move and name failures flatly instead.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when starting any session of relatively extensive or large-scale autonomous work — above all any large-scale population of queue.md with created tasks — to run the three local-cron productivity playbook (work-loop, auto-flush, status-report).
Replicate the methods of "Neural Computers" (arXiv:2604.06425) and produce a runnable artifact, a published findings report, and a downloadable replication package.
Reproduce results from the Sutra paper — build the compiler, run the 10-program smoke test, run the rotation-vs-Hadamard capacity tables (LLM + ESM-2 protein-LM substrates), the chained-bind crosstalk experiment, plus the loop function decl + codebook test suites.
Use at the start of a session in a cleanvibe-scaffolded project, at most weekly — fetch cleanvibe's updates page and refresh this repo's .claude/skills/ to the latest shipped versions.
Use when the user says "cron job", "cron", or asks to "schedule" a task — they mean the in-session CronCreate tool firing locally on their own running computer, with standing consent; just set it up.
Use when the user sends a continuous series of "stop" messages (e.g. "stop stop stop") or otherwise very explicitly demands an immediate halt — kill all running processes, background jobs, and GitHub Actions runs for this repo, then take no further actions.
| name | writing-style |
| description | Use when writing any prose — reports, commit messages, devlog entries, PR descriptions, documentation — to avoid the self-congratulatory "honest"/"frank"/"candid"/"transparent" move and name failures flatly instead. |
Do not use "honest", "honesty", or "honestly" — and do not swap in "frank", "frankly", "candid", "candidly", or "transparently", which are the same self-congratulatory move in a different coat. When something failed, name the failure: "it didn't work", "I got that wrong", "this failed" — flat, no qualifier. Tagging a report "honest" implies the rest aren't, and couching a failure as honesty asks for credit for the admission, which is worse than the failure itself. Use a precise positive word ("accurate", "plainly", "truly") only when that is genuinely the meaning — never as a halo on a bad outcome.
