ワンクリックで
sorkin
Checks pacing and momentum. Is there enough forward motion? Are you walking and talking or standing still?
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Checks pacing and momentum. Is there enough forward motion? Are you walking and talking or standing still?
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Reads your writing through the meanest, least-charitable lens. Challenges every claim, questions every assumption, pokes holes in the logic. Use for later drafts when you want hard feedback.
Run a multi-round deliberation between reviewers. Unlike /panel (which synthesizes), /debate has reviewers respond to each other's arguments across rounds until tensions resolve or reach acknowledged stalemate.
Review a draft for big-picture issues—argument, structure, stakes, and payoff. Invoke with /dev-edit after drafting or with any draft the user provides.
Checks writing for clarity and accessibility. Flags jargon without explanation, hand-wavy process descriptions, and skipped steps. Ensures content is specific enough for experts AND clear enough for newcomers. Use when reviewing technical or process-heavy writing.
Scan any Every draft for recurring editorial-review failures: clarity and evidence gaps, argument problems, mechanics red flags, second-order AI tells, and, for Working Overtime only, column-specific voice tics and structural throat-clearing. Use when reviewing or polishing Every writing before submission. Reports findings with line-level diagnoses and suggested fixes. Pairs with ai-check and every-style.
Cuts ruthlessly. Flags every adjective, adverb, and unnecessary word. Demands you kill your darlings.
| name | sorkin |
| description | Checks pacing and momentum. Is there enough forward motion? Are you walking and talking or standing still? |
| user_invocable | true |
Check your writing for pacing and momentum. This skill reads like Aaron Sorkin edits—looking for forward motion, urgency, and the feeling that things are happening. Walking and talking, not standing and explaining.
Use this when:
/sorkin [text] — Check pacing and momentum in the provided text/sorkin — System asks "What feels too slow?"In Sorkin's shows, characters deliver exposition while moving—down hallways, through offices, toward destinations. The motion creates urgency even when they're just explaining things.
In writing, "walking and talking" means:
Standing still: "Let me explain how the system works."
Walking and talking: "The system was already failing when I arrived. By the time I understood why, it was too late to stop it."
| Problem | What It Looks Like | The Fix |
|---|---|---|
| The Stall | Progress stops for explanation. | Weave exposition into action. |
| The Lecture | Writer talks at reader, not with them. | Add questions, stakes, or conflict. |
| The Meander | Piece wanders without direction. | Make the destination visible. |
| The Pile-Up | Too much happens too fast. | Let key moments breathe. |
| The Even Pace | Same rhythm throughout. | Vary sentence length and scene intensity. |
| The Dead End | Section ends without pushing forward. | Each section should propel into the next. |
The reader should always know (or wonder) where this is going. What's the question we're racing toward answering?
Each paragraph should push into the next. End on something that demands continuation, not a neat conclusion.
Why does this matter now? Why can't we slow down? (Even artificial urgency—"I only had three days"—creates drive.)
Break up long stretches. A short sentence. A question. A new voice. A scene cut. Variety in rhythm is variety in pacing.
Counterintuitively, slowing down at key moments can increase momentum—it builds anticipation. But you have to earn it.
## Pacing Check
**Overall momentum:** [Static / Sluggish / Steady / Driving]
**Where it stalls:** [The biggest slowdown]
---
### Section-by-Section
**[Section/paragraph identifier]**
- Pace: [Fast / Medium / Slow]
- Problem: [If any]
- Note: [What's working or not]
[Repeat for each section]
---
### Momentum Killers
1. [Specific passage] — [Why it slows things down]
2. [Specific passage] — [Why it slows things down]
---
### The Rewrite
[Sample section rewritten with better pacing]
---
**What changed:**
- [How momentum was improved]
Does this feel urgent enough, or too rushed?
At any point in the piece, can the reader answer: "What are we trying to figure out / get to / understand?"
If not, momentum is dead.
[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]