メニュー
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
The Evaluate-Loop coordinator for soe. Runs the BRAINSTORM → PLAN → EVALUATE_PLAN → EXECUTE → EVALUATE_EXEC → (FIX↺ | COMPLETE) state machine for a track: dispatches leaf agents, dispatches workers into isolated worktrees and applies their validated returns serially, and is the SOLE writer of .soe/tracks/{id}/state.json. Resumes crash-safely from committed state and bounds its fix/plan loops. Use when: 'run the loop', 'orchestrate', 'run the track', 'evaluate-loop', 'drive the track to completion'.
Session-model-led multi-model tiering. Use in ANY conversation (ambient) or in the pipeline to decide which model tier does which slice of work, and to delegate to the right model-pinned agent (strategist/deep-reasoner/fast-worker). The session model you selected IS the orchestrator; it self-selects its topology from its own model identity.
Use when the orchestrator needs to delegate an implementation task to an isolated worker — dispatches each worker as a Task-tool subagent in its own git worktree, awaits its return as the completion signal, and applies results serially as the sole state.json writer behind a validated context firewall
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
Use at run start to discover what reviewers/analyzers/generators any installed plugin provides and route work by ROLE. Builds a role→provider map via lib/capability-scan.js so the loop prefers the best-matching installed specialist (a Go reviewer, a Flutter reviewer, AgentShield, ...) and falls back to soe-core's generic (soe:code-reviewer, soe:security-reviewer, soe:architect, ...) when none is installed. soe-core is self-sufficient and NEVER hard-depends on packs.
| name | using-soe |
| description | Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions |
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
The session model you are running as IS the orchestrator. For which model tier does which slice of work, and how to delegate to the right model-pinned agent, invoke soe:model-orchestration — it self-selects the topology from your own model identity. This hook does not detect or switch your model.