assistant-merge
Verify gates one last time and merge an assistant PR (new-assistant or vendor-evolution). Use when the issue is at phase:merge-ready.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Verify gates one last time and merge an assistant PR (new-assistant or vendor-evolution). Use when the issue is at phase:merge-ready.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Scaffold (new-assistant) or refactor (vendor-evolution), document, test, and open a draft PR. Use when the issue is at phase:approved or phase:implementing and the contributor is starting or resuming work.
Open the right `type:new-assistant` / `type:vendor-evolution` GitHub issue from a free-form intent. Use when the user says they want to support / fix / evolve a vendor and has not yet filed an issue.
Review an open assistant PR against the dual-track checklist (dated documentation first, then code), with per-issue-type addenda for new vendors vs evolution. Use when the issue is at phase:review.
Routes to the correct sub-skill of the assistant family based on the issue's type:* and phase:* labels. Use when the user mentions a vendor onboarding or evolution and is unsure which skill to run.
Tally tester sign-off comments on a phase:testing issue, audit any attached connector logs for sanitization gaps, and draft follow-ups for incomplete confirmations. Use whenever a tester comments.
Help the maintainer triage a phase:proposed assistant issue (new-assistant or vendor-evolution) — duplicate check, scope sanity, kind:* label application, decision draft. Use when reviewing an incoming proposal.
| name | assistant-merge |
| description | Verify gates one last time and merge an assistant PR (new-assistant or vendor-evolution). Use when the issue is at phase:merge-ready. |
| model | sonnet |
Read docs/ASSISTANT-ONBOARDING.md; it owns the threshold rules
(including the kind:urgent-fix escape hatch) and the phase
transitions. Read .claude/rules/skill-handoff.md for the shared
Phase-A self-check and PR pre-flight pattern. If this skill and the
spec disagree, the spec wins.
A GitHub issue number.
Apply the Phase-A self-check from .claude/rules/skill-handoff.md
(mutex auto-correction). Refuse unless the issue is at
phase:merge-ready. Read the issue's type:* and (when present)
kind:* labels — they drive the threshold.
Run the PR pre-flight (gh pr view <pr> --json isDraft,mergeable).
Refuse if isDraft=true (cannot merge a draft) or mergeable is not
MERGEABLE (resolve conflicts first).
Re-run the tester tally (same logic as assistant-tester-followup)
against the current state. Re-run the reviewer checklist. Refuse to
merge if any gate is not green.
Threshold rules:
type:vendor-evolution + kind:urgent-fix → ≥ 1 confirmation is
sufficient.The PR author is allowed to count as one of those confirmations when they post a sign-off comment as a tester.
Before merging, push the user-facing updates onto the PR branch so they
ship in the same commit as the code. Branch on type:*:
type:new-assistantUpdate every README touchpoint that enumerates supported vendors (see
docs/ASSISTANT-ONBOARDING.md §3.1.6 for the full list — at minimum
"Supported Assistants" and "Cache and Logs"; scan for any other
Claude/Codex enumeration the README has grown since). Also add a row
to docs/vendors/index.md if it exists.
Before staging, re-grep the README for the previously supported vendor slugs to confirm no enumeration was missed:
grep -nE 'Claude Code|Codex|claude-usages|codex-usages' README.md
Inspect the output, fix any missed touchpoint, then show the diff to the user and propose to commit & push:
git checkout <pr-branch>
git add README.md docs/vendors/index.md
git commit -m "docs(<slug>): announce <Display Name> in README and vendor index"
git push
type:vendor-evolutionNon-breaking → no commit in this phase. Skip straight to Phase D.
kind:breaking → ensure the README's compatibility note (or the
Min app version annotation in the vendor doc) is reflected
wherever users decide which version to install. If an edit is
needed, show the diff and propose:
git checkout <pr-branch>
git add <edited files>
git commit -m "docs(<slug>): note <next-version>+ requirement"
git push
If no edit is needed (the compatibility note is already accurate), skip the commit and move to Phase D.
Draft the release-notes text now. It becomes the single source of
truth that the maintainer (or a release-engineering workflow) will
aggregate into the GitHub release notes when cutting the next tag.
Required content per type/kind, see docs/ASSISTANT-ONBOARDING.md
§3.1.6:
assistant-tester-tally:sticky comment).kind:breaking — prefix with
BREAKING: <vendor> connector requires <next-version>+ and explain
what users on older versions will see (typically: lastError
replacing live metrics).kind:urgent-fix — affected subset, since when, what the fix does.Show the draft to the user for sign-off before Phase E.
The PR branch already contains the user-facing commits (from Phase C). Merge with the standard workflow:
gh pr merge <pr> --merge
The release-notes draft from Phase D will be posted separately as a comment on the issue (see Phase F below), to be aggregated into the GitHub release notes when the maintainer cuts a tag.
phase:mergedgh issue edit <n> --remove-label "phase:merge-ready" --add-label "phase:merged"
Comment on the issue summarizing the merge and stating that the issue
will stay open until the next tagged release. For kind:urgent-fix,
also note: "Issue will stay at phase:released for follow-up tester
confirmations after the release ships."
This is the terminal phase for the assistant skill family. The issue
stays open at phase:merged until a tagged release ships including the
merge commit; at that point the maintainer (or a release-engineering
workflow) transitions to phase:released and closes the issue.
The squash-merge commit body authored in Phase D is the single source
of truth for the release notes. It is the maintainer's responsibility
to aggregate merge commit bodies into the GitHub release notes when
they cut a tag — this skill does not edit gh release (it is a
destructive operation that would clobber concurrent vendor changes
shipped in the same release).