legal-briefing

name	legal-briefing
description	Pre-execution intake coordination for complex Spanish legal matters. Triggered before multi-agent execution on complex disputes, transactions, or compliance reviews. Assembles a specialist panel of 3-5 agents, conducts adaptive questioning, builds an execution plan, and assigns a complexity score (1-10). Supports cross-session persistence.

Legal Briefing

Objective

Coordinate pre-execution intake for complex Spanish legal matters. Assemble a specialist panel, conduct adaptive questioning, build a comprehensive execution plan, and assign a complexity score.

Trigger Conditions

Activate for:

• Multi-jurisdictional disputes (state + CCAA)
• High-stakes litigation (amount > EUR 100,000)
• Corporate transactions (M&A, restructuring)
• Regulatory investigations (CNMV, BdE, SEPBLAC, AEPD)
• Complex contractual frameworks
• Appeals to TS or TC
• Cross-border matters with Spanish element

Specialist Panel Assembly

Panel Composition (3–5 Agents)

Role	Skill	Responsibility
Lead researcher	spanish-legal-research	Core legal research, legislation, case law
Strategist	spanish-legal-strategy	Procedural pathway, timeline, cost analysis
Document specialist	spanish-legal-drafting	Draft contracts, court submissions, opinions
Jurisdiction analyst	spanish-jurisdictions	CCAA law, foral systems, forum selection
Compliance analyst	compliance-frameworks	Regulatory compliance, CNMV/BdE/SEPBLAC/AEPD
Data protection specialist	data-protection-law	LOPDGDD, GDPR, AEPD matters
Adversarial analyst	adversarial-analysis	Stress-test legal positions
Translator	spanish-legal-translation	ES ↔ EN documentation

Selection criteria:

• Minimum 3 agents; maximum 5
• Include spanish-legal-research in all panels
• Include spanish-legal-strategy for litigation matters
• Include compliance-frameworks for regulatory matters
• Include data-protection-law for data/privacy matters

Adaptive Questioning Rounds

Round 1: Matter Identification

• What is the legal issue? (civil, penal, mercantil, laboral, administrativo, constitucional)
• What is the approximate amount in dispute?
• Which parties are involved?
• Is there a pending proceeding? (Juzgado, AP, TS, TC)

Round 2: Jurisdiction & Forum

• Which CCAA is involved?
• Does foral law apply? (PV, NC, GA)
• Are co-official languages relevant? (CT, PV, GA, IB, VC)
• Is there a forum selection clause?

Round 3: Evidence & Documents

• What documents exist? (contracts, emails, invoices, court filings)
• Are there expert reports?
• What is the status of evidence gathering?
• Are there statute of limitations (prescripción / caducidad) concerns?

Round 4: Strategic Objectives

• What is the desired outcome?
• Is settlement an option?
• What is the budget for legal costs?
• What is the timeline sensitivity?

Round 5: Regulatory & Compliance

• Are regulators involved? (CNMV, BdE, SEPBLAC, AEPD)
• Are there data protection issues?
• Are there sector-specific compliance requirements?
• Are there cross-border elements?

Complexity Scoring (1–10)

Score	Description	Panel Size	Estimated Effort
1–2	Simple query, single issue	1–2 agents	1–2 hours
3–4	Standard matter, state law only	2–3 agents	2–4 hours
5–6	Multi-issue, potential CCAA law	3–4 agents	4–8 hours
7–8	Complex litigation, regulatory overlap	4–5 agents	8–16 hours
9–10	High-stakes, multi-jurisdictional, appeals	5 agents	16+ hours

Scoring factors:

• Number of legal domains involved (+1 per domain)
• CCAA law complexity (+2 if foral law applies)
• Regulatory overlap (+1 per regulator)
• Appeal level (+1 if TS, +2 if TC)
• Cross-border elements (+1)
• Amount in dispute (+1 if > EUR 500,000)
• Urgency (+1 if < 30 days)

Execution Plan Building

Plan Structure

# Execution Plan
**Matter:** [Subject]
**Complexity:** [Score]/10
**Panel:** [Agent skills]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]

## Phase 1: Research & Analysis
- **Agent:** [Skill]
- **Tasks:** [Specific research tasks]
- **Deliverable:** [Output format]
- **Deadline:** [Relative timeline]

## Phase 2: Strategy & Positioning
- **Agent:** [Skill]
- **Tasks:** [Strategy development]
- **Deliverable:** [Output format]
- **Deadline:** [Relative timeline]

## Phase 3: Adversarial Testing
- **Agent:** [Skill]
- **Tasks:** [Stress-test positions]
- **Deliverable:** [Output format]
- **Deadline:** [Relative timeline]

## Phase 4: Drafting
- **Agent:** [Skill]
- **Tasks:** [Document preparation]
- **Deliverable:** [Output format]
- **Deadline:** [Relative timeline]

## Phase 5: Review & Consolidation
- **Agent:** [Skill]
- **Tasks:** [Quality review, summarization]
- **Deliverable:** [Output format]
- **Deadline:** [Relative timeline]

## Cross-Session Persistence
- **Session ID:** [Identifier]
- **State:** [Research completed / Strategy pending / Draft pending]
- **Next action:** [What to resume]

Cross-Session Persistence Support

• Assign a unique session identifier
• Document completed phases and pending tasks
• Store key findings and citations for continuity
• Note any questions requiring user input before resuming

Output Format

# Legal Briefing Report
**Matter:** [Subject]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Disclaimer:** This briefing is for planning purposes. Execution requires a Spanish abogado colegiado.

## 1. Matter Summary
[2–3 sentence summary]

## 2. Complexity Score
**Score:** [X]/10
**Rationale:** [Scoring breakdown]

## 3. Specialist Panel
| # | Skill | Role | Tasks |
|---|-------|------|-------|
| 1 | [Skill] | [Role] | [Tasks] |

## 4. Adaptive Questioning Results
- **Round 1 (Matter ID):** [Key findings]
- **Round 2 (Jurisdiction):** [Key findings]
- **Round 3 (Evidence):** [Key findings]
- **Round 4 (Strategy):** [Key findings]
- **Round 5 (Compliance):** [Key findings]

## 5. Execution Plan
[Phased plan as above]

## 6. Open Questions
- [Questions requiring user input before proceeding]

## 7. Cross-Session Persistence
- **Session ID:** [ID]
- **Status:** [Ready to execute / Awaiting user input]
- **Next step:** [Action]