review-paper

name	review-paper
description	Run the Agentic Reviewer academic paper review pipeline for a paper and target journal or conference. Use when the user asks to review, assess, or evaluate a paper for submission to a journal or conference.

Review Paper

Run the repository's paper review workflow.

Inputs required from the user:

• Paper path, usually under papers/
• Target journal or conference name

If either input is missing, ask for it before starting.

Workflow

1. Create reports/<journal-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>/.
2. Write 00-session-info.md.
3. If the paper is not Markdown, use the convert-paper skill to convert it.
4. Check context/<journal-slug>/ for cached journal context.
5. Unless the user says re-explore, reuse cached context only when all four files exist:
   • scope-and-criteria.md
   • recent-papers-analysis.md
   • style-guide.md
   • reputation-profile.md
6. If context is missing, stale, or incomplete, run only the exploration skills needed to produce missing or stale files:
   • explore-journal-scope
   • explore-recent-papers
   • explore-style-guide
   • explore-reputation
7. After exploration is complete, run the reviewer skills:
   • review-scope
   • review-methodology
   • review-writing-style
   • review-statistics
   • review-ethics
8. After all reviewer outputs exist, use compile-report.

Output Contract

All session artifacts must be written to the timestamped report directory:

reports/<journal-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>/

Do not commit changes unless the user explicitly asks.