メニュー
Write a decision record from context, options, evidence, and trade-offs. Produces a clear recommendation with explicit revisit triggers, not a generic pros-and-cons list.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Format responses in plain Markdown using simple headings, bullets, and fenced code blocks.
Prefer purpose-built filesystem and text tools over shell, batch independent calls, and use safe edit locators.
Use attached and local context first, separate observed facts from inferred conclusions, and cite source paths.
Generate one Mermaid diagram plus concise commentary.
Implementation plan and snippets for the specified React stack.
Scaffold idiomatic table-driven tests for a given function.
| name | decision-record-authoring |
| description | Write a decision record from context, options, evidence, and trade-offs. Produces a clear recommendation with explicit revisit triggers, not a generic pros-and-cons list. |
Write a decision record that takes a position. Recommendation, trade-offs accepted, and what would change the decision.
Workflow phases:
context -> options -> evidence -> trade-offs -> recommendation -> revisit triggers
Take a position. A decision record without a recommendation is just a comparison. State the chosen option, why it wins, and what is being accepted in exchange.
Evidence vs assumption. Distinguish evidence (data, prior incidents, quoted constraints, cited sources) from assumption (reasonable belief without direct support).
Revisit triggers. State the conditions that would reopen the decision: metric thresholds, scale points, organizational changes, dependency shifts, or external events. Without revisit triggers, the record will silently rot.
Use only sections that matter.
context: what is being decided, who is affected, constraints, status quo.
decision-needed: the specific question this record answers.
options-considered: each option with one-sentence summary, fit, evidence, and primary cost.
decision: the chosen option, in one paragraph.
rationale: why this option wins; how it satisfies hard constraints.
trade-offs: what is accepted as a cost or limitation by choosing this option.
risks: residual risks and the proposed mitigations.
revisit-triggers: concrete conditions that should reopen this decision.
next-steps: actions, owners, and rough timing implied by the decision.
End each response with: scope, confidence (high|medium|low), status, key assumptions, next-step (only if useful).