ワンクリックで
gaia-skill-tree
gaia-skill-tree には gaia-research から収集した 62 個の skills があり、リポジトリ単位の職業カバレッジとサイト内 skill 詳細ページを表示します。
このリポジトリの skills
Helper for release operations, compilation of changelogs between tags, version lockstep syncing, and promotion of GitHub releases from canary/pre-release to latest/production. Use when the user asks to "compile the changelog", "promote release to latest", "tag a release", or do version release operations.
Push committed changes and create a draft PR on GitHub. Use when you have staged changes ready to push and want to open a draft PR for early feedback or documentation.
Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.
Phase 4 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Checks every URL in the evidence data lake for HTTP liveness — catches dead links (404, 403, timeout, connection errors) before evidence is ingested into the registry. Use this skill when: running the full /ev-pipeline, asked to "validate links", "check evidence URLs", "run link validation", "find dead links in the data lake", "check HTTP status of evidence sources", or "verify evidence links still work". Also useful standalone when you suspect evidence sources have gone stale after a long gap between pipeline runs. Wraps validate_sources.py, which uses Firecrawl CLI to scrape each unique URL and records pass/fail status in a markdown report. Requires Firecrawl CLI to be installed and authenticated.
Top-level orchestrator for the Gaia Registry evidence verification pipeline. Run this when you want to do a full evidence pass — collecting raw sources, verifying live GitHub star counts, adversarially auditing for quality/formatting issues, and checking that every URL is reachable — all in one coordinated sequence. Trigger phrases: "run the evidence pipeline", "full evidence pass", "verify evidence", "evidence verification pipeline", "run ev-pipeline", "check all evidence", "audit the data lake", "evidence quality sweep", "refresh evidence", "validate evidence sources". Also aliased as /evidence-verification-pipeline. Use the individual sub-skills (ev-collection, ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, ev-link-validation) only when you need to re-run one phase in isolation; for end-to-end work, always start here.
Canonical entry point for the full Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Invoke as /evidence-verification-pipeline or /ev-pipeline — both names trigger this skill. Use whenever you need to run all four evidence phases end-to-end: collecting raw evidence from the data lake, verifying live GitHub star counts, running adversarial auditing for noise and URL errors, and checking link health via Firecrawl. Also use when someone says "run the evidence pipeline", "verify the evidence lake", "audit evidence", "run ev-pipeline", "full evidence check", "pipeline run", "prepare evidence for ingestion", or "refresh the data lake". This is the pre-ingestion step — run it before importing any evidence into the registry.
Batch wrapper for /gaia-ingest. Ingests a bounded set of already-verified evidence rows through CLI-only writes, uses --no-build on every row, appraises Trust Magnitude for every affected named skill, then runs exactly one build and validation pass. Use for an L4-approved intake after /ev-pipeline.
Atomically ingest one already-verified evidence row into one named Gaia skill using the CLI, then appraise Trust Magnitude and propose—never silently apply—a calibration. Use after /ev-pipeline has verified an approved intake source, or whenever a curator says "ingest evidence", "add verified evidence", "gaia-ingest", or "turn this source into registry evidence".
Discovery-only Gaia curation for one manually selected source page. Fetches and normalizes up to five real SKILL.md candidates, deduplicates and maps them for human L4 review, then stops without evidence scoring or registry mutation.
Fixed-topology, discovery-only extension for Gaia curation. Atomically checkpoints each candidate transition, retries only the failed field, and stops at human L4 review.
Harness-neutral, discovery-only Gaia curation extension. A Sol/Terra-class orchestrator preflights capacity, shards safe volume work to configurable Luna workers, converges risky cases, and stops at human L4 review.
Discovery-only global trending extension for Gaia. Snapshots configured external skill sources, prioritizes five-candidate pages for L4 review, and stops before trust, evidence, intake, or registry mutation.
Triage and classify pending Gaia skill intake batches in registry-for-review/. Use for gaia push intake proposals, draft skill batches, and deciding whether proposals should proceed to canonical curation. This skill is read-only and never promotes skills itself.
Review a Gaia curation PR or branch as a read-only merge gate. Use for canonical registry promotion, schema, evidence, prerequisite, nomenclature, installability, and generated-artifact checks. Route intake batches to /gaia-draft-curate and unrelated PRs to /review.
Use this skill whenever the user wants to see how their branch will look on the live Gaia website before merging — "preview this branch", "show me what this looks like", "deploy a preview", "trigger a design preview", "can I see the site with these changes", "preview the skill profile", "check how this renders on the site", "spin up a preview deployment". This skill dispatches a Cloudflare Worker preview deployment for the current branch via GitHub Actions — no local build tooling required. Ideal for containerized environments, design reviews, and confirming that newly curated skills or profile pages render correctly before a PR is merged to main. The preview does NOT regenerate docs; it deploys `docs/` from the branch as-is. If your change depends on regenerated Class S artifacts, run `gaia dev docs` and commit those first — the preview then reflects them.
Combine two AI agent skills into one. Trigger phrases: /fuse, "fuse these skills", "combine skills", "merge these two skills", "create a fusion skill"
Post-merge intake closing skill. After a review/meta PR that closes intake issues is merged (or is CI-green and approved), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR and each intake issue. Comments include: full evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion guidance, and a badge status note. Use after /gaia-curate-chain completes and before or immediately after merge.
Dry-run Trust Magnitude for proposed named skills or suites before curation. Use when deciding whether a proposed suite deserves A/S treatment, when checking fusion-recipe bias, when comparing repo stars vs suite component counts, or when asked to appraise a candidate before adding it to the registry.
Bootstrap a new standalone skill repo under gaia-research/ from the canonical template set at gaia-research/gaia-research/templates/skill-repo/. Handles the full flow: interactive prompts for all placeholders, fetches templates via the GitHub API, substitutes values, creates the new repo (gaia-research/skill-<name>), writes README.md / SKILL.md / install.sh / .gitignore / LICENSE / powered-by-gaia.svg, makes the initial commit and pushes. Also supports update mode: re-applies the template structure to a pre-existing skill repo and opens a draft PR with the drift. Use when the user says "new skill repo", "bootstrap a skill repo", "/skill-template", "create skill-foo", "spin up a gaia-research skill repo", "template a new skill", "align skill-fuse to the template", or "/skill-template update <repo>". Requires: gh CLI (authenticated with gaia-research org access), python3, git.
Measure CI churn cost for a pull request: how many commits and how many CI-compute seconds were burned on avoidable "fix the CI" push rounds. Use when you want to understand the efficiency cost of a PR's iteration cycle, get actionable pre-push check suggestions, or include a churn summary in a pipeline report. Triggers: "ci churn", "how much CI did we burn", "avoidable commits", "ci efficiency", "wasted CI time", "churn report", "/ci-churn". Called automatically by /fp-drift at pipeline close.
Phase 5 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-iterate prints the M4 stop hook confirming CI is green. Fetches origin/main, runs gaia dev diff to surface any skill-registry changes the PR introduced that are unrelated to its stated purpose (accidental drift), then prints the final pipeline summary including a CI churn report (via /ci-churn). Also invoke standalone whenever you want to audit whether a branch has unexpected registry drift — e.g. before merging any review/meta or cli/ branch, or when a reviewer asks "did this PR touch anything it shouldn't?". Triggers: "check for drift", "drift check", "final summary", "pipeline done", "wrap up the pipeline", "fp-drift", "Phase 5".
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
Regenerate and commit Class S site-served artifacts after registry changes, then sync documentation across the main repo and the adjacent wiki. Use this skill when: you've changed registry/nodes/, registry/named/, or named-skills.json and need to regenerate docs/graph/* so the live website reflects the update; CI Guard E (docs-cohesion.yml) is failing because Class S artifacts are out of date; someone says "sync the docs", "regenerate docs", "run gaia dev docs", "update the site graph", "commit the Class S artifacts", "website is stale", or "update the wiki"; or you're finishing a registry PR and need to ensure docs/graph/gaia.json, docs/graph/gaia.gexf, docs/graph/gaia.svg, and docs/graph/named/index.json are committed alongside the source change. Also covers updating README.md, docs/index.html, and mirroring changes to the adjacent wiki repo at ../gaia-wiki.
Founder orchestrator persona for Marcus Tiongson's gaia-skill-tree sessions. Activates the planner-and-delegator role defined in founder/ORCHESTRATOR.md — thinking partner, session steward, subagent spawner. Use at the start of any founder-mode work session on this repo.
Toggle the badges-page Honesty Mode build-time flag on or off. ON makes the README badge generator emit direct /badges/_assets/<handle>/<file>.svg URLs (no Cloudflare Worker, no ?repo= validation). OFF restores worker-validated URLs. Use when the user says "/honesty-mode on", "/honesty-mode off", "turn honesty mode on/off", or asks for the current honesty-mode state.
Founder orchestrator persona for Marcus Tiongson's gaia-skill-tree sessions. Activates the planner-and-delegator role defined in founder/ORCHESTRATOR.md — thinking partner, session steward, subagent spawner. Use at the start of any founder-mode work session on this repo.
Toggle the badges-page Honesty Mode build-time flag on or off. ON makes the README badge generator emit direct /badges/_assets/<handle>/<file>.svg URLs (no Cloudflare Worker, no ?repo= validation). OFF restores worker-validated URLs. Use when the user says "/honesty-mode on", "/honesty-mode off", "turn honesty mode on/off", or asks for the current honesty-mode state.
Publish a new post (announcement, link, or LaTeX-style meta report) to the Gaia site. Use when you want to add any update to the registry's public feed and landing page.
Use this skill when the user wants the full existing-registry Trust Magnitude inspector: understand why a named Gaia skill has a particular star rank, what its Trust Magnitude (TM) score is, which evidence rows are contributing (or dead), how far it is from the next grade, or what evidence to add to move the needle. Also use when asked for a full leaderboard of all named skills ranked by TM. Triggers: "why does X have 3 stars", "what's the TM for X", "inspect TM", "explain the score for X", "what evidence would rank up X", "show leaderboard", "rank all skills by TM", "what's dragging down X's score", "dead evidence rows", "how close is X to grade A/S".
Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, or skills whose star tier doesn't match their classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the tier files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline. Deploys 4 parallel adversarial reviewer subagents across the tier files, then a 5th synthesis subagent to merge findings, and appends results to the daily source report.
Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the Gaia registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.
Phase 2 of the evidence verification pipeline. Validates GitHub star counts in registry skill files against live GitHub API data, flags stale or inflated metrics, and partitions all evidence into six tier-ranked markdown dumps (tier_1.md through tier_6.md) inside evidence/. Use this after /ev-collection has compiled the unified data lake and before /ev-adversarial-audit begins. Trigger phrases: "verify stars", "check star counts", "refresh stargazer metrics", "partition evidence by tier", "run star verification", "ev-star-verification", "Phase 2", "live star check", "update tier dumps", "star tier partitioning".
Multi-agent exploration-to-PR pipeline for safely exploring, fixing, and shipping a feature or CLI. Use when the user says: "explore X", "test and ship X", "run the pipeline on X", "run /feature-pipeline on X", "let's properly investigate X", "stress-test X and file issues", or "take X through the full pipeline." Also triggers on: "find what's broken in X", "test X end-to-end", "do a sandbox review of X", "file issues for X and fix them." Do NOT use for single-file bug fixes or one-off edits — the overhead is only justified when exploration, planning approval, and CI watching all matter. Manages state via scripts/state.sh (jq required). Five phases: LIGHTER explores → ORCHESTRATOR drafts PR → HEAVIER plans (user approves first) → ORCHESTRATOR commits → HEAVIER sandbox review → LIGHTER iterates CI → LIGHTER drift check + summary. Four mandatory stop hooks (M1–M4) gate each phase transition.
Firecrawl gives AI agents and apps fast, reliable web context with strong search, scraping, and interaction tools. One install command sets up three skill segments: live CLI tools, app-integration build skills, and outcome-focused workflow skills. Route the reader to the right usage path after install.
Phase 1 of the feature-pipeline suite — stress-test a CLI command, feature, flag, or module as a developer seeing it for the first time, then file GitHub issues for every distinct finding. Use when someone says "explore X", "test X", "find issues with X", "what's wrong with X", or after /feature-pipeline init. Also triggers standalone as /fp-explore <feature> when you want just the exploration phase without the full pipeline. Reads the target feature from .fp-state.json (or the argument if provided). Completes in one bounded turn and prints the M1 stop hook so the user decides whether to continue to /fp-plan.
Phase 3 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-plan has received explicit user approval and printed the M2-plan stop hook — when you need to translate an approved numbered plan into committed, pushed code. Triggers on: "implement the plan", "start coding", "commit the plan", "write the code", "fp-implement", "Phase 3", "plan is approved let's code", "next step after plan", "execute the plan", "apply the plan", "make the changes". Reads planApproved and branch from state; refuses to run if approval hasn't been recorded. Commits one atomic change per plan step, pushes after each commit, handles obstacles cleanly, and hands off to /fp-review when done. Never squashes or skips steps — the one-commit-per-step rule keeps the review history readable and rollback surgical.
Phase 4 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-review has posted a sandbox review comment — it reads the outstanding checkbox items, applies fixes, then watches CI until green (or exits cleanly so you can retry). Trigger phrases: "address review items", "fix review feedback", "resolve review checklist", "watch CI", "poll CI", "check if CI is green", "iterate on PR", "fp-iterate", "Phase 4", "after review comment", "fix the review issues and watch CI". Always bounded — max 10 poll rounds, never loops forever. Exits with a clear status: green (hands off to /fp-drift), still-pending (re-invoke), or failed (diagnose before touching anything).
Phase 2 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-explore has filed issues and printed the M1 stop hook — when you need to turn a set of filed GitHub issues into an approved implementation plan and a draft PR. Triggers on: "plan the fix", "create the branch and PR", "draft the implementation plan", "ready to plan", "fp-plan", "next step after explore", "convert issues to a plan", "plan phase". Reads issueNumbers from state, writes a Problem Statement, opens a feature branch + draft PR, spawns a HEAVIER sub-agent for the numbered plan, and blocks on explicit user approval before writing plan to state. Does NOT write any code — that is /fp-implement.
Phase 3 of the feature-pipeline suite. Run this after /fp-implement has pushed all commits and printed the M2 stop hook. Spawns a sandboxed sub-agent (HEAVIER) in an isolated worktree to run RED/GREEN tests against the PR diff and post a structured review comment. Use when you need an independent agent to verify correctness of implementation changes before CI runs — especially for schema mutations, CLI surface changes, or doc-touching commits. Triggers on: "review the PR", "run sandbox review", "fp-review", "Phase 3", "check the implementation", "validate the changes", "run tests on the PR", or any instruction to verify what /fp-implement just pushed.
Focused single-target audit of one Gaia skill, named skill, or real-skill catalog item. Use this skill when: auditing a specific skill by ID or name, a skill looks overpromoted, evidence feels thin or dead, a contributor's skill seems outdated or superseded, the rank doesn't match the source quality, evidence is mapped to the wrong type, a skill at 3★+ is missing a working GitHub link, someone asks "does this skill deserve its stars?", or you want the smallest possible correction with validation — not a bulk sweep. This is NOT for bulk curation passes (use /gaia-curate for that) or meta-level registry sweeps (use /gaia-meta-audit). It is specifically for "fix this one skill, get it right."