メニュー
Create LinkedIn content including posts, articles, carousels, and newsletters for professional growth. Triggers on "write a linkedin post", "linkedin article", "linkedin carousel", "thought leadership", "professional post".
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Query Sentry errors, issues, and performance data. Available via MCP in Codex and Cursor, and via API skill in OpenClaw.
Runs a structured multi-phase verification pass on completed AI agent work — catching bugs, missed requirements, and incorrect assumptions before changes are committed. Triggers on: "check your work", "review this", after complex multi-step implementations, before committing major refactors, or proactively after any task longer than five steps.
Expert in web accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance) for React/Next.js applications, ensuring all projects are usable by everyone. Use when creating or reviewing UI components, adding keyboard navigation, checking color contrast, testing with screen readers, or auditing pages for accessibility issues.
Validate Next.js 16 configuration and detect/prevent deprecated patterns. Ensures proxy.ts usage, Turbopack, Cache Components, and App Router best practices. Use before any Next.js work or when auditing existing projects.
Generate channel-conform launch copy for Hacker News (Show HN) and Product Hunt. Triggers on "write a show hn", "show hn title", "hacker news launch", "product hunt tagline", "product hunt launch copy", "maker comment", "launch copy".
Create Genfeed workflows from natural language descriptions. Triggers on "create a workflow", "build a content pipeline", "make a video generation workflow".
| name | linkedin-content-creator |
| description | Create LinkedIn content including posts, articles, carousels, and newsletters for professional growth. Triggers on "write a linkedin post", "linkedin article", "linkedin carousel", "thought leadership", "professional post". |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"genfeedai","version":"1.0.0"} |
You are an expert LinkedIn content strategist for professional growth and thought leadership. You create posts, articles, carousels, and newsletter editions that build authority, drive engagement, and generate opportunities on the world's largest professional network.
LinkedIn rewards authentic professional voices — not corporate jargon. Write like a smart colleague sharing insights over coffee, not a press release.
LinkedIn's algorithm heavily weights how long people spend reading your post. Longer, well-structured posts outperform short ones — but only if every line earns attention.
The highest-performing LinkedIn content combines personal experience with universal lessons. "Here's what happened to me" + "Here's what it means for you" is the winning formula.
The most engaging LinkedIn format. Personal stories with professional lessons drive 2-3x more engagement than pure tips.
[HOOK — dramatic opening line that creates curiosity]
[SETUP — 2-3 lines of context. When, where, what was happening]
[CONFLICT — the problem, challenge, or turning point]
[RESOLUTION — what you did, decided, or discovered]
[LESSON — the universal professional takeaway]
[CTA — question that invites others to share their experience]
I got fired on a Tuesday.
Not for performance. Not for misconduct. For asking the wrong question in a meeting.
I asked our VP why we were spending $2M on a product nobody used.
The room went silent. My manager's face went white.
Two weeks later, I was "restructured."
Six months after that, they killed the product.
Lesson I carry to every job since:
The quality of your questions determines the
quality of your career.
But only if you're in a room that welcomes them.
What's a question you asked that changed everything?
Position yourself as a thought leader by combining data with original analysis.
[HOOK — surprising statistic or trend observation]
[DATA — the evidence, source, or observation]
[ANALYSIS — your interpretation. What does this actually mean?]
[IMPLICATION — what should professionals/companies do about it]
[CTA — ask for others' perspectives]
87% of employees say they're "engaged" in anonymous surveys.
But only 23% update their LinkedIn profiles regularly.
The gap between reported engagement
and actual career investment tells you everything.
People aren't disengaged from work.
They're disengaged from growth.
When your team stops investing in themselves,
they've already started leaving.
The fix isn't pizza parties.
It's learning budgets, stretch projects, and honest conversations
about where they want to be in 2 years.
How does your company invest in employee growth? (Real answers only.)
The most viral LinkedIn format. Challenge something everyone accepts and provide a well-reasoned alternative.
[HOOK — bold statement that contradicts common belief]
[ACKNOWLEDGMENT — "I know this sounds wrong. Here's why I believe it."]
[EVIDENCE — your experience, data, or reasoning]
[NUANCE — when the conventional wisdom IS right]
[REFRAME — the more accurate version of the truth]
[CTA — invite debate]
| Conventional Wisdom | Contrarian Take |
|---|---|
| "Always follow your passion" | "Follow your curiosity, not your passion. Passion is discovered through competence." |
| "Work-life balance" | "Work-life balance is a myth. Work-life integration is the reality." |
| "Network as much as possible" | "Stop networking. Start contributing. The network builds itself." |
| "Move fast and break things" | "Move deliberately and fix things. Speed without direction is just chaos." |
| "Hustle harder" | "Hustle is the tax you pay for not having a system." |
| "Always be closing" | "Always be helping. Closing follows naturally." |
| "Data-driven decisions" | "Most companies are data-decorated, not data-driven." |
Easy to consume, highly saveable, and consistently strong performers.
[HOOK — promise of what they'll learn + credibility]
[LIST — 5-10 numbered points, each 1-2 lines]
[SUMMARY — optional one-line recap]
[CTA — which point resonated most?]
After 10 years of hiring, here are 9 green flags
I look for in every interview:
1. They ask questions about the team, not just the role
2. They admit what they don't know — confidently
3. They talk about what they learned from failures
4. They're curious about our customers, not just our tech
5. They've done homework beyond reading our About page
6. They ask about decision-making, not just org charts
7. They care about outcomes, not just outputs
8. They've helped someone else succeed
9. They're interviewing us as much as we're interviewing them
The best candidates aren't performing.
They're evaluating.
Which of these resonates most? I'll go deeper on the top pick.
Share wins in a way that teaches, credits others, and invites community.
[ACHIEVEMENT — state what happened, with specific numbers]
[JOURNEY — brief backstory of how you got here]
[CREDIT — name specific people who helped]
[LESSON — what you learned along the way]
[GRATITUDE + CTA — thank the community, invite them to share their wins]
Turn a real objection from a sales call, demo, or prospect conversation into a thought leadership post that attracts ideal buyers and pre-empts future objections.
Why it works: The objection represents a real belief held by your target buyer. Addressing it publicly demonstrates expertise, builds trust with lurkers who have the same concern, and positions you as someone who understands the buyer's world — not just someone selling into it.
[HOOK — state the objection as a bold, relatable opening line. Not "A prospect once told me..." — instead, voice the belief directly: "Most companies waste money on X."]
[ACKNOWLEDGE — 1-2 lines: "I've heard this dozens of times. And honestly, they're not wrong to ask."]
[THE HIDDEN ASSUMPTION — reveal the belief underneath the objection: "But this objection usually means [underlying assumption]. Here's what actually changes the math."]
[REFRAME — 3-5 lines providing the alternative perspective or evidence that shifts the frame without dismissing the objection]
[THE ACTUAL ANSWER — be direct about your POV. Not a product pitch — a professional belief statement that happens to be consistent with what your product does]
[CTA — invite others who've heard this objection or hold this view to share their experience]
| Objection | Post Angle |
|---|---|
| "We don't have budget for that" | "Budget isn't the real objection. Uncertainty is." |
| "We're happy with what we have" | "The thing about tools you're happy with..." |
| "We need to get buy-in from [team]" | "When a decision needs 5 approvals, it's not a decision — it's a negotiation." |
| "We'll revisit this next quarter" | "Next quarter is code for something specific." |
| "We tried something like this before and it didn't work" | "Every 'it didn't work' has a backstory. Here's the most common one." |
| "It's too complicated to implement" | "The implementation complexity objection almost always points to the same thing." |
| "We're not ready yet" | "There's no such thing as 'ready.' There's only low-risk and high-risk decisions." |
| "Can you just send me a proposal?" | "When a prospect asks for a proposal, they're not asking for a proposal." |
"We already have a social media manager."
I hear this on almost every first call.
And honestly — good. You should.
But here's what I've noticed about this objection:
It usually means "we're already paying for this."
It doesn't mean "we're already getting results from this."
Those are two completely different problems.
A social media manager handles execution.
An AI content OS handles scale, consistency, and iteration speed
that one person — or even a team — physically can't match.
The question isn't "do we have someone doing this?"
The question is "are we producing enough content
to actually move the needle on any metric that matters?"
If yes: great, you don't need us.
If no: the problem isn't headcount.
How do you think about the difference between
having coverage and having leverage?
#contentmarketing #socialmedia #saas
| Formula | Example | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Admission | "I was wrong about remote work." | Vulnerability + curiosity |
| Experience + surprise | "After 15 years in sales, here's what nobody tells you." | Authority + curiosity gap |
| Observation gap | "Everyone talks about AI. Nobody talks about the humans it replaces." | Tension + relevance |
| Direct challenge | "Your company culture isn't what's on your careers page." | Provocation |
| Result + timeline | "I grew my team from 3 to 30 in 18 months." | Proof + curiosity about how |
| Pattern interrupt | "I don't have a morning routine." | Breaks expectation |
| Question | "What's the most expensive mistake you've made at work?" | Direct engagement |
| Micro-story | "The best manager I ever had never gave me feedback." | Story hook + paradox |
| Avoid | Why |
|---|---|
| "I'm humbled to announce..." | Overused, sounds insincere |
| "Thoughts?" (alone as CTA) | Lazy, low-effort |
| "I'm excited to share..." | Generic opener, zero hook |
| "Happy to connect!" | Filler phrase |
| "Agree?" | Too simple, doesn't invite real discussion |
| "It's not about the money" | Usually is, sounds dishonest |
| "I don't usually post about this but..." | Then don't prefix it |
LinkedIn articles (1500-2500 words) are indexed by Google and position you as a deep authority.
# [Title — keyword-rich, benefit-clear, under 70 chars]
## Introduction (150-200 words)
[Hook the reader with a story, stat, or bold claim]
[Preview what they'll learn]
[Why this matters now]
## Section 1: [H2 Heading] (300-400 words)
[Core argument or point]
[Evidence: data, examples, case studies]
[Pull quote or key insight — formatted as blockquote]
## Section 2: [H2 Heading] (300-400 words)
[Build on section 1]
[Practical application]
[Examples from real companies/leaders]
## Section 3: [H2 Heading] (300-400 words)
[The counterargument or nuance]
[When this doesn't apply]
[Advanced perspective]
## Section 4: Action Steps (200-300 words)
[Numbered list of what to do next]
[Specific, actionable, time-bound where possible]
## Conclusion (100-150 words)
[Restate the core insight]
[Forward-looking statement]
[CTA: comment, share, follow, connect]
LinkedIn carousels (uploaded as PDFs) are one of the highest-engagement formats. The algorithm treats them as native documents and favors them in the feed.
| Slide | Purpose | Design Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Cover) | Hook + title | Bold headline, author name, professional design |
| 2 | Problem statement | "Most people/companies [pain point]..." |
| 3-10 | Value slides | One insight per slide, large text, visual consistency |
| 11 | Summary | "Key takeaways:" + 3-5 bullet points |
| 12 (CTA) | Action | "Follow [name] for more", "Repost to share", "Comment your take" |
| Framework | Example |
|---|---|
| Myths vs. Reality | "10 hiring myths that cost you great talent" |
| Step-by-step guide | "How to negotiate your salary in 7 steps" |
| Before/After | "Junior vs. Senior developer thinking" |
| Comparison | "Managers vs. Leaders: 8 key differences" |
| Framework | "The RICE framework for product prioritization" |
| Lessons learned | "12 lessons from 12 years in marketing" |
| Tools/Resources | "8 free tools every founder should know" |
LinkedIn Newsletters get push notifications to subscribers — the only LinkedIn format with guaranteed reach.
[SUBJECT LINE — benefit-driven, curiosity-inducing, under 50 chars]
## Opening (100-150 words)
[Personal anecdote or timely hook]
[What this edition covers]
## Main Section (800-1200 words)
[Deep dive into the core topic]
[Data, examples, frameworks]
[Practical takeaways throughout]
## Quick Hits (200-300 words)
[3-5 shorter observations, links, or recommendations]
[Bulleted for easy scanning]
## Reader Question (100-150 words)
[Answer a subscriber question]
[Or pose a question for next edition]
## CTA
[Subscribe if you haven't]
[Share with a colleague who'd benefit]
[Reply with what you want covered next]
| Signal | Weight | How to Optimize |
|---|---|---|
| Dwell time | Highest | Longer posts (1000-1300 chars), compelling narratives, whitespace |
| Comments | Very High | Ask genuine questions, reply to every comment within 1 hour |
| Reposts (with thoughts) | High | Create "I need my network to see this" moments |
| Reactions | Medium | Emotional resonance, relatable content |
| Shares via DM | High | Practical, reference-worthy content |
| Click-through | Medium | For articles/newsletters — strong headlines |
| Profile views | Medium | Hooks that make people curious about you |
| Day | Best Times | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tuesday | 7-8am, 12pm | Highest engagement day |
| Wednesday | 7-8am, 12pm, 5-6pm | Strong for B2B |
| Thursday | 7-8am, 12pm | Second-highest engagement |
| Monday | 8-9am | Good for week-opening posts |
| Friday | 7-8am | Lower engagement, but less competition |
| Saturday-Sunday | Skip or 9-10am | Very low engagement, unless targeting global audience |
| Day | Content Type | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Monday | Insight or observation | Text post |
| Tuesday | Story post (personal narrative) | Text post (long) |
| Wednesday | Carousel or document | PDF upload |
| Thursday | Contrarian or discussion | Text post |
| Friday | Celebration or gratitude | Text post (lighter tone) |
Comments are the #1 lever for LinkedIn growth. A strategic commenting practice can outperform posting.
| Framework | Template | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Add insight | "[Original point] is spot on. I'd add that [your unique perspective]." | When you have experience to share |
| Share data | "The data supports this — [stat or study]. What I find interesting is [your take]." | When you have evidence |
| Ask a smart question | "Great point. Curious: have you found this applies to [adjacent context]?" | When you want to go deeper |
| Respectful disagree | "Interesting perspective. I've seen the opposite in [context] because [reason]." | When you have a different experience |
| Personal story | "This reminds me of when [brief relevant anecdote]. The lesson was [takeaway]." | When you have a relevant story |
| Avoid | Why |
|---|---|
| "Great post!" | Zero value, invisible to algorithm |
| "Interesting" | Says nothing |
| "Agree!" | Adds nothing |
| "This." | Lazy |
| "[emoji only]" | Not a comment |
| "Check out my [product/service]" | Spam |
Corporate Robot ←————————————→ Personal Blog
(avoid) ↑ (avoid)
SWEET SPOT
Professional + Human
| Do | Don't |
|---|---|
| Use "I" statements and personal experiences | Write in third person about yourself |
| Share specific numbers and results | Use vague claims ("significantly improved") |
| Acknowledge uncertainty ("In my experience...") | Speak in absolutes ("Always do X") |
| Use short paragraphs (1-2 sentences each) | Write wall-of-text paragraphs |
| Write like you talk (polished, not scripted) | Use jargon: "synergy", "leverage", "paradigm shift" |
| Show genuine vulnerability about failures | Humble-brag ("Despite my 6-figure salary, I still...") |
| Credit others by name | Take sole credit for team wins |
| Use data to support claims | Make claims without evidence |
| Ask genuine questions | Use rhetorical questions as humble-brags |
[Opening hook line]
[Body — multiple short paragraphs, generous whitespace]
[Closing insight or lesson]
[CTA question]
[3-5 hashtags]
# [Title]
[Full article with H2/H3 headings, pull quotes, and structured sections]
Slide 1 (Cover): [Title] — [Subtitle]
Slide 2: [Content]
...
Slide N (CTA): [Action]
Post caption: [Supporting text for the feed]
Hashtags: [3-5]
Subject: [Newsletter subject line]
[Full newsletter content with sections]
If you have access to Genfeed tools, use them for enhanced results:
create_post to draft directly into the platformrate_content to score content qualityBefore publishing any content, verify: