ワンクリックで
process-compliance-review
Review whether the product-development process and required artifacts were actually followed.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Review whether the product-development process and required artifacts were actually followed.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | Process Compliance Review |
| description | Review whether the product-development process and required artifacts were actually followed. |
| when-to-use | Use during Reviewer gate before submitting a verdict. |
| user-invocable | false |
| context | inline |
Review the work as a process and evidence audit, not just a code review.
Before reviewing:
GetTeamContext.GetTeamContext.contract as the authoritative Team Acceptance Contract.TEAM_ACCEPTANCE_CONTRACT.md is optional unless the runtime contract lists it in required_artifacts.Required checks:
PRD.md exists and matches the user request.UX_DESIGN.md exists and is based on the PRD.BACKEND_PLAN.md and FRONTEND_PLAN.md exist and stay within their boundaries.INTERFACE_CONTRACT.md exists and matches the implementation.INTEGRATION_REPORT.md exists and proves real component integration.QA_REPORT.md exists and includes required command evidence.Blocking findings:
required_artifacts but is absent from both runtime artifacts and disk.Write review evidence to <project_root>/REVIEW_REPORT.md and call SubmitGateVerdict.
Convert source notes into claim-level evidence with confidence and limitations.
Verify source traceability, artifact completeness, and citation correctness before citation_qa gate.
Write an evidence-backed final research report from sources and the evidence matrix.
Review research method quality, source diversity, bias, and conclusion strength.
Convert a broad research request into subquestions, assumptions, and source criteria.
Design and execute a multi-round SearxNG/arXiv search strategy.