メニュー
Identifies what is MISSING from a deliverable — gaps in structure, stakeholder coverage, scenarios, risks, evidence, and regulatory considerations. Runs in parallel with the Analyst. Use when checking deliverable completeness or detecting blind spots.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | gap-analysis |
| description | Identifies what is MISSING from a deliverable — gaps in structure, stakeholder coverage, scenarios, risks, evidence, and regulatory considerations. Runs in parallel with the Analyst. Use when checking deliverable completeness or detecting blind spots. |
{WORKSPACE}= timestamped run directory provided by the orchestrator.
Detect blind spots. The Analyst extracts what the deliverable contains; the Gap Analyzer identifies what it SHOULD contain but doesn't. These two tasks are independent and run in parallel.
Generate polished, interactive single-file HTML reports with business-minimal design for Japanese client defense scenarios. Compiles analysis, critique, persuasion scenarios, and QA validation results into a navigable, print-friendly report. Use this skill when creating final defense reports, rendering analysis results as HTML, generating business reports, or producing client-meeting preparation documents. MUST trigger on any report generation or HTML output task in the defense pipeline.
Analyze deliverables and generate defense strategies for Japanese clients. Input any deliverable (document, spec, presentation, report) and receive a comprehensive HTML report with item-by-item critique, multi-level persuasion scenarios, and Big 5 consulting QA validation. Use this skill whenever preparing for Japanese client reviews, defending deliverables against Japanese criticism, building persuasion arguments for Japanese business contexts, or needing to anticipate Japanese banking client objections. MUST trigger on any request involving Japanese client defense, deliverable review preparation, persuasion scenario generation, or 日本クライアント対策.
Identifies undecided/pending items in deliverables and provides structured option analysis with recommendations. Handles 要検討, ?, 未確定, TBD markers. Use when deliverables contain unresolved decision points that should be analyzed separately from defects.
Simulate a demanding Japanese banking/financial client reviewing deliverables. Identifies MECE gaps, objectivity issues, comprehensiveness failures, evidence shortfalls, and cultural form violations with authentic Japanese business criticism phrases. Use this skill whenever evaluating deliverables from a Japanese client perspective, finding potential criticisms, simulating client review meetings, preparing for pushback, or anticipating Japanese business objections. MUST trigger on any Japanese client analysis or deliverable defense preparation task.
Build multi-level counter-argument trees (minimum 3 levels) for defending deliverables against Japanese client criticism. Creates culturally calibrated debate scenarios with escalating persuasion techniques, Japanese business phrasing, and practical preparation notes. Use this skill when creating defense arguments, building counter-argument scenarios, preparing for Japanese client pushback, developing persuasion strategies, or rehearsing difficult client conversations. MUST trigger on any persuasion scenario generation or argument tree building task.
Validate persuasion arguments through Big 5 consulting firm lenses: McKinsey (structure/logic), BCG (strategic pragmatism), Bain (results orientation), Deloitte (evidence/compliance), Accenture (implementation feasibility). Grades each argument A-F per lens, identifies weaknesses, and prescribes concrete improvements. Use this skill whenever quality-checking defense arguments, validating persuasion scenarios, ensuring consulting-grade quality, reviewing argument logic, or auditing deliverable defense strategies. MUST trigger on any QA validation or argument quality review task.
