atproto-publish-lexicon

name	atproto-publish-lexicon
description	Guides publishing an AT Protocol lexicon as a com.atproto.lexicon.schema record and resolving NSIDs back to lexicon documents. Use when the user mentions publish my lexicon, lexicon registry, NSID authority, _lexicon TXT record, describe_lexicon, com.atproto.lexicon.schema, rkey is the NSID, lexicon-garden, or atpmcp.
version	0.1.0

AT Protocol Lexicon Publication

A lexicon isn't published until it's a record. This skill covers the protocol-level workflow that takes a validated lexicon JSON document, wraps it as a com.atproto.lexicon.schema record, writes it to the authoring DID's repo, and makes it resolvable by NSID. The inverse — consumers resolving an NSID back to a lexicon — is the other half.

Authoring the JSON document itself is the sibling skill atproto-lexicon's job. This skill starts the moment you're ready to put that document on the network.

When to use

• The user is publishing a new lexicon or a revision to an existing one (putRecord / createRecord on com.atproto.lexicon.schema).
• The user is debugging why their published lexicon doesn't resolve — authority mismatch, missing _lexicon. TXT, wrong rkey.
• The user is consuming a lexicon by NSID at runtime and wants to understand the resolution chain (NSID → authority → DNS → DID → PDS → record).
• The user is planning a breaking change and needs to know how revision and the authority model interact.

What this skill provides

• A publish pipeline: form the record, validate, check authority, diff against any prior revision, compute the CID, publish, verify.
• The com.atproto.lexicon.schema record shape — what's top-level, what id must equal, what lexicon: 1 means.
• The resolution flow for consumers: reverse-DNS the NSID, look up _lexicon.<authority> TXT, resolve the DID, fetch the record.
• The authority model: who's allowed to publish under which NSID prefix, and why the PDS doesn't enforce it.
• Revision discipline: monotonic integers, no semver, how to gate breaking changes.

Detail lives in references/; this file is the procedure.

Procedure

Follow these steps in order. Skipping authority or compatibility checks is how lexicons ship broken.

1. Form the record. A com.atproto.lexicon.schema record is the lexicon document with a $type stamped on top. Top-level fields:

   • $type: com.atproto.lexicon.schema (required)
   • lexicon: 1 — the lexicon language version, fixed at 1 today (not a semver of your doc)
   • id: the NSID, e.g. com.example.foo.getBar — MUST equal the rkey you'll publish under
   • revision: optional integer; omit for the first publish, bump monotonically thereafter
   • description: optional top-level string
   • defs: the map of definition names to def objects (main, plus any secondary defs)

   See references/record-shape.md for a field-by-field breakdown and a canonical example.

2. Validate the lexicon body. Call one of:

   • lexicon-garden.validate_lexicon(doc) — spec-conformant validator, remote.
   • atpmcp.validate_lexicon_schema(doc) — local equivalent.

   Fix every error before touching the network. A malformed defs map, an unresolvable internal #ref, or a missing main when the NSID names a record/query/procedure/subscription will all be rejected here. Don't paper over warnings — publishing a broken lexicon is worse than not publishing at all, because other actors may cache the CID.

3. Check authority. Derive the authority domain from the NSID by reversing the first segments except the final name segment:

   • com.example.foo.getBar → authority = example.com
   • app.bsky.feed.post → authority = bsky.app
   • social.pdsls.tools.listBookmarks → authority = pdsls.social (final segment is the name; everything before it reverses to the domain)

   Then:

   • Query the DNS _lexicon.<authority> TXT record. It contains did=did:plc:... (or any DID method).
   • That DID is the only one whose publications under this NSID prefix will be honored by consumers.
   • The DID the user is publishing from must match. If it doesn't, stop — the publish will succeed on their PDS but silently no-op at resolution time.

   For resolving the DID itself to a PDS endpoint, defer to atproto-identity-resolution. See references/authority-and-ownership.md for the squatting model and edge cases.

4. Check for a prior version. Fetch the current on-network record, if any:

   • atpmcp.get_record(at://<publisher-did>/com.atproto.lexicon.schema/<nsid>), or
   • atpmcp.invoke_xrpc("com.atproto.repo.getRecord", {repo: <did>, collection: "com.atproto.lexicon.schema", rkey: <nsid>}), or the lexicon-garden equivalents.

   If one exists:

   • Run lexicon-garden.check_compatibility(old_doc, new_doc).
   • Bump revision to old.revision + 1 (or start at 1 if absent).
   • Refuse to publish breaking changes silently. If the check flags a break, require the user to either mint a new NSID (e.g. com.example.foo.getBarV2) or explicitly acknowledge the break. The revision spec is a social signal, not a gate — surfacing the break is your job, not the PDS's.

   Full break/non-break matrix: defer to skills/atproto-lexicon/shared/backward-compat.md rather than duplicating. Revision-specific rules: references/backward-compat-revisions.md.

5. Compute the canonical CID. Run lexicon-garden.create_record_cid(record) (or the atpmcp equivalent). This is a sanity check — it round-trips the record through DRISL canonical CBOR. If the CID your encoder produces disagrees with the MCP tool's, your encoder is non-canonical somewhere and the PDS will compute a different CID than you expect. Investigate before publishing; a wrong CID means consumers can't verify the record against any reference you hand them. DRISL details live in skills/atproto-repository §drisl; CID encoding in skills/atproto-cid.

6. Publish. Call com.atproto.repo.putRecord:

   collection: com.atproto.lexicon.schema
   rkey:       <the full NSID, verbatim — e.g. com.example.foo.getBar>
   record:     <the doc from step 1>
   validate:   true
   

   Use putRecord (idempotent) rather than createRecord for updates; either works for a first publish. The PDS will re-validate the record against the com.atproto.lexicon.schema lexicon. The most common reject is id != rkey.

   For SDK-level snippets in your stack, defer to:

   • Rust → skills/atproto-lexicon/rust/xrpc-client.md
   • TypeScript → skills/atproto-lexicon/typescript/xrpc-client.md
   • Go → skills/atproto-lexicon/go/xrpc-client.md

   This skill does not duplicate those.

7. Verify resolution end-to-end. Immediately after publish:

   • Re-fetch via getRecord and compare the returned CID to the one from step 5. They should match exactly.
   • Optionally call lexicon-garden.describe_lexicon(<nsid>) to confirm the network's spec-conformant resolver can see your record. A 404 here when getRecord works usually means your _lexicon. TXT is missing or points at the wrong DID.

   If resolution fails but getRecord succeeds, the record is published but unclaimable — re-check step 3.

See references/publish-checklist.md for a condensed pre-flight list you can walk through each time.

Resolution (consumer side)

The inverse of publishing. Given an NSID, how does a client fetch the lexicon?

1. Reverse-DNS the NSID to extract the authority domain (same rule as step 3 above: reverse all segments except the final name segment).
2. Resolve authority → DID via the _lexicon.<authority> TXT record, parsing the did= key.
3. Resolve DID → PDS via standard DID-doc resolution — defer to atproto-identity-resolution.
4. Fetch the record with com.atproto.repo.getRecord:
   • repo = <did>
   • collection = com.atproto.lexicon.schema
   • rkey = <the full NSID>
5. Use the record as a lexicon document. The record's fields (id, lexicon, defs, revision, ...) are the lexicon document. Hand it to your catalog (atproto-lexicon covers catalog loading).

lexicon-garden.describe_lexicon(nsid) collapses all five steps behind one MCP call; call it first unless you're specifically debugging the resolution chain.

Full diagram and edge cases: references/resolution-flow.md.

MCP tools this skill drives

• lexicon-garden → validate_lexicon(doc), check_compatibility(old, new), create_record_cid(record), describe_lexicon(nsid), invoke_xrpc(method, params, input?).
• atpmcp → validate_lexicon_schema(doc), get_record(at_uri), get_lexicon(nsid), create_record_cid(record), invoke_xrpc(method, params, input?).

Prefer lexicon-garden for spec-conformant checks and network resolution. Prefer atpmcp when working against a local dev PDS or when you need deterministic behavior in scripts.

References

• references/record-shape.md — com.atproto.lexicon.schema field-by-field, with example.
• references/resolution-flow.md — NSID → authority → DNS → DID → PDS → record, with diagram.
• references/authority-and-ownership.md — why the PDS doesn't enforce NSID authority, and why consumers do.
• references/backward-compat-revisions.md — revision monotonicity, deprecation windows, and when to mint a new NSID instead.
• references/publish-checklist.md — pre-flight checklist to walk through before every publish.

External specs:

• https://atproto.com/specs/lexicon — lexicon document + resolution.
• https://atproto.com/specs/nsid — NSID grammar and authority rules.
• lexicons/com/atproto/lexicon/schema.json in bluesky-social/atproto — the record lexicon this skill publishes against.

Adjacent skills:

• atproto-lexicon — authoring the JSON, catalog loading, codegen, client-side validation, XRPC invocation.
• atproto-identity-resolution — DID/handle resolution, _atproto. TXT, DID-doc shape.
• atproto-repository — CAR/MST/commit signing, DRISL canonical CBOR.
• atproto-cid — CID parsing/construction, tag 42.

Examples

Publish trace

NSID:        com.example.foo.getBar
Publisher:   did:plc:abc123 (owns example.com)
Step 1: Form record
   { $type: "com.atproto.lexicon.schema",
     lexicon: 1,
     id: "com.example.foo.getBar",
     revision: 3,
     defs: { main: { type: "query", ... } } }
Step 2: validate_lexicon(doc) → OK
Step 3: DNS _lexicon.example.com TXT → did=did:plc:abc123 ✓ matches publisher
Step 4: get_record(at://did:plc:abc123/com.atproto.lexicon.schema/com.example.foo.getBar)
   → existing record, revision 2. check_compatibility(old, new) → OK (added optional field).
Step 5: create_record_cid(record) → bafyrei…7xq ✓
Step 6: invoke_xrpc("com.atproto.repo.putRecord", {
           repo: "did:plc:abc123",
           collection: "com.atproto.lexicon.schema",
           rkey: "com.example.foo.getBar",
           record: <doc>,
           validate: true
         }) → 200 OK, cid: bafyrei…7xq
Step 7: describe_lexicon("com.example.foo.getBar") → returns the new record ✓

Resolution trace

Input:       com.example.foo.getBar
Step 1: authority = example.com
Step 2: DNS _lexicon.example.com TXT → did=did:plc:abc123
Step 3: DID doc → PDS at https://pds.example.com
Step 4: com.atproto.repo.getRecord(repo=did:plc:abc123,
          collection=com.atproto.lexicon.schema,
          rkey=com.example.foo.getBar)
        → { $type, lexicon: 1, id, defs, revision, ... }
Step 5: hand to catalog; use for validation/invocation.

Backlog

• A scripts/verify-authority.sh (or similar) that given an NSID + DID resolves _lexicon.<authority> and reports match/mismatch. Useful for CI gates on lexicon repos. Not in v0.1; add if users report hitting authority errors frequently.