メニュー
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | requesting-code-review |
| description | Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements |
Dispatch ultraship:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:
Use Task tool with ultraship:code-reviewer type, fill template at code-reviewer.md
Placeholders:
{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary3. Act on feedback:
[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]
You: Let me request code review before proceeding.
BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
[Dispatch ultraship:code-reviewer subagent]
WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/ultraship/plans/deployment-plan.md
BASE_SHA: a7981ec
HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
[Subagent returns]:
Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
Issues:
Important: Missing progress indicators
Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
Assessment: Ready to proceed
You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]
Subagent-Driven Development:
Executing Plans:
Ad-Hoc Development:
Never:
If reviewer wrong:
See template at: requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md
Build a regression + eval harness for AI-written code and AI features. Generates characterization tests that lock current behavior before a refactor, scaffolds a Promptfoo eval suite for chatbots/RAG/classifiers, and wires it into the ship-gate. Use when the user wants evals, regression tests for AI code, to stop AI features drifting, or to test an LLM feature.
Run security audit — dependency vulnerabilities, secret scanning, OWASP pattern detection, HTTP headers. Use when user wants to harden their project.
Accessibility audit + auto-fix (WCAG 2.2 A/AA). Scans built/static HTML for screen-reader, keyboard, and structure failures, fixes the deterministic ones, and escalates to a rendered scan for contrast and focus. Use when the user wants to check or improve accessibility, fix WCAG issues, or pass an a11y review.
Turn the /ship scorecard into a blocking, config-as-code quality gate. Sets per-category score thresholds, hard-fails on leaked secrets or critical findings, and wires the gate into a pre-push hook and CI so nothing below the bar merges. Use when the user wants a merge gate, CI quality gate, pre-push check, or to enforce ship-readiness.
Post-deploy canary monitoring — checks site health, detects regressions, monitors for errors after deployment. Use after deploying to verify production is healthy.
Code review with principal-engineer-level depth. Reviews for correctness, performance, security, maintainability, and architecture. Use when completing tasks, reviewing PRs, or before merging.