ワンクリックで
rai-bugfix-run
Run the full 7-phase bugfix pipeline with 3 HITL gates. Use to orchestrate a bug fix.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Run the full 7-phase bugfix pipeline with 3 HITL gates. Use to orchestrate a bug fix.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | rai-bugfix-run |
| description | Run the full 7-phase bugfix pipeline with 3 HITL gates. Use to orchestrate a bug fix. |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Edit","Write","Grep","Glob","Bash","Skill"] |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"raise.work_cycle":"bugfix","raise.frequency":"per-bug","raise.fase":"","raise.prerequisites":"","raise.next":"","raise.gate":"","raise.adaptable":"true","raise.version":"2.4.0","raise.visibility":"public","raise.skillset":"raise-maintainability","raise.inputs":"- bug_id: string, required, argument (e.g. \"RAISE-251\")\n","raise.outputs":"- mr_url: string, git\n- retro_md: file_path (work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/retro.md)\n- patterns: list, cli (via rai pattern add)\n"} |
Execute the full 7-phase bugfix pipeline inline (no subagents), pausing at 3 fixed HITL gates where human judgment prevents cascading errors.
Design principles:
When to use: Starting or resuming any tracked bug fix. Replaces manual sequential skill invocation.
When to skip: Single-phase work (e.g., only running review on an already-fixed bug). Individual skills remain independently invocable.
Inputs: Bug ID (e.g., RAISE-251).
Check artifacts in reverse order — take the most advanced phase:
| Check | Artifact | If exists → resume at |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/retro.md | close |
| 5 | Code commits on bug branch after plan.md | review |
| 4 | work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/plan.md | fix |
| 3 | work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/analysis.md | plan |
| 2 | work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/scope.md with ^TRIAGE: | analyse |
| 1 | work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/scope.md without TRIAGE | triage |
| 0 | (nothing) | start |
Present: "Phase detection: resuming at {phase}" or "Starting fresh."
Abbreviation rule: If resuming at analyse or later (scope+triage pre-exist from a prior session), GATE 1 is skipped — the scope was already validated when it was created. GATE 2 and GATE 3 are always mandatory.
Before creating a worktree or starting work, verify the bug isn't already fixed:
rai backlog get-comments RAISE-{N} -a jiragit log release/{version} --grep="RAISE-{N}" --oneline── Already-Resolved Check ──
RAISE-{N} may already be fixed:
{evidence: Jira comment / commit / code change}
▸ Continue with bugfix pipeline? [y/close]
If user says close → transition Jira to Done, skip entire pipeline. This prevents wasting a worktree on resolved bugs.
Before starting, handle Jira assignment (best-effort, non-blocking):
rai backlog update RAISE-{N} --assignee "{developer-email}" -a jira
rai backlog transition RAISE-{N} in-progress -a jira
Query the graph for relevant context (single query, non-blocking):
rai graph query "bugs patterns {component or keywords from bug summary}" --types pattern --limit 5
If graph returns results, present them as context before starting phase 1. If graph is unavailable (e.g., worktree without index), note and continue — graph context is enrichment, not a gate.
Execute each phase inline by reading the SKILL.md and following its steps directly. No subagents.
Chain order:
| Phase | Skill | Then |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | /rai-bugfix-start | → GATE 1 |
| 2 | /rai-bugfix-triage | ↓ |
| 3 | /rai-bugfix-analyse | → GATE 2 |
| 4 | /rai-bugfix-plan | ↓ |
| 5 | /rai-bugfix-fix | → GATE 3 |
| 6 | /rai-bugfix-review | ↓ |
| 7 | /rai-bugfix-close | done |
Per phase:
.claude/skills/rai-bugfix-{phase}/SKILL.mdCompletion banner:
### ✔ Phase {N}/7 — {skill_name}
| | File | Status |
|---|---|---|
| + | `path/to/file.md` | created |
| ~ | `path/to/file.py` | modified |
**Commits:** {count} (`{hash}`)
Each phase's steps fully executed before proceeding.
Phase fails → STOP immediately. Report which phase and why. Re-invoke `/rai-bugfix-run` after fixing — phase detection resumes from last artifact.
After phases 1-2, present for human verification:
── GATE 1: Scope & Classification ──
Bug: RAISE-{N} — {summary}
Reproduction:
WHAT: {from scope.md}
WHERE: {from scope.md}
Reproduces: {yes/no}
Classification:
Bug Type: {value}
Severity: {value}
Origin: {value}
Qualifier: {value}
▸ Is this the right problem with the right classification? [y/edit/reject]
| Response | Action |
|---|---|
| y | Continue to analyse |
| edit | Human corrects scope or classification → update artifacts + MCP → continue |
| reject | STOP — re-evaluate problem definition |
After phase 3, present root cause and multiple fix approaches with trade-offs. This is the highest-value gate — it caught an over-engineered strategy in the 2026-04-05 session (code fallback vs. simple gitignore fix). Always present at least 2 options.
── GATE 2: Root Cause & Strategy ──
Root cause: {from analysis.md}
Method: {5 Whys / Ishikawa / Direct}
Evidence: {key evidence supporting root cause}
Fix approaches:
A: {simplest approach} — {trade-off}
B: {recommended approach} — {trade-off}
C: {most thorough approach} — {trade-off} (if applicable)
Recommended: {A/B/C} because {reasoning}
▸ Which approach? [a/b/c/adjust/reject]
| Response | Action |
|---|---|
| a/b/c | Continue to plan + fix with selected approach |
| adjust | Human refines strategy → update analysis.md → continue |
| reject | STOP — re-analyse with different hypotheses |
Bias toward simplicity: If the simplest approach (A) fully addresses the root cause, recommend it. Code changes are not always the answer — configuration, documentation, or process fixes may be simpler and more durable.
After phase 5, present fix results:
── GATE 3: Fix Verification ──
Tasks completed: {N}/{total}
Tests: {count} passed
Bug reproduces: {no — verified}
Files changed:
{list of modified files}
▸ Does the fix look correct? [y/reject]
| Response | Action |
|---|---|
| y | Continue to review + close |
| reject | STOP — human reviews code, identifies issues |
After all phases complete:
rai backlog transition RAISE-{N} done -a jira
## Bugfix Run Complete: RAISE-{N}
**Phases:** {start_phase} → close ({N} phases executed)
**Result:** MR created targeting `{dev_branch}` ({mr_url})
### Artifacts
| Phase | File | Op |
|-------|------|:--:|
| start | `work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/scope.md` | + |
| triage | `work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/scope.md` | ~ |
| analyse | `work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/analysis.md` | + |
| plan | `work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/plan.md` | + |
| fix | `src/path/to/file.py` | ~ |
| review | `work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/retro.md` | + |
### Classification
{Bug Type} / {Severity} / {Origin} / {Qualifier}
### Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Tests | {count} passed |
| Commits | {total} across 7 phases |
| Patterns | {PAT-IDs or "none"} |
| Jira | RAISE-{N} → Done |
| Item | Destination |
|---|---|
| All bug artifacts | work/bugs/RAISE-{N}/ |
| Merge request | GitLab MR: bug branch → {dev_branch} |
| Patterns | .raise/rai/memory/patterns.jsonl |
| Next | Next bug or epic work |
/rai-bugfix-start, -triage, -analyse, -plan, -fix, -review, -closework/epics/e1286-bugfix-pipeline-orchestration/design.md (D1-D6)Interactive adapter setup for Jira and Confluence. Detects available backends, discovers projects/spaces, generates validated YAML config. 3-4 questions max.
Evaluate design proportionality using Beck's four rules. Use after implementation.
Root cause analysis using the method best suited to the bug. Phase 3 of bugfix pipeline.
Push branch, create MR, verify artifacts complete. Phase 7 of bugfix pipeline.
Execute fix tasks with TDD and all validation gates. Phase 5 of bugfix pipeline.
Decompose fix into atomic TDD tasks. Phase 4 of bugfix pipeline.