ワンクリックで
ultragoal
Create and execute durable repo-native multi-goal plans over GJC goal mode artifacts.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Create and execute durable repo-native multi-goal plans over GJC goal mode artifacts.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
사용자의 막연한 아이디어를 한 질문씩 인터뷰해서 실행 가능한 MVP 스펙으로 만든다
Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before explicit execution approval
Consensus planning entrypoint that auto-gates vague team/ultragoal requests before execution
Multi-worker GJC tmux team orchestration
QA the omo Codex Light edition (lazycodex / packages/omo-codex) itself, in strict isolation so ONLY our plugin is exercised, never the user's real ~/.codex. The first-party method drives the real `codex app-server` against an isolated CODEX_HOME plus a LOCAL mock model (no real API call), and proves a plugin hook fired by asserting hook/started + hook/completed notifications. Also: isolated install verification, per-component hook probes, a tmux TUI smoke, and runtime log observation (RUST_LOG / logs SQLite / /debug-config). Ships tested helper scripts each with a --self-test. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-codex or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Codex plugin, its hooks/components, the installer/config.toml, the app-server flow, or the Codex TUI. Triggers: codex qa, qa codex, codex-qa, test codex plugin, verify codex hook, codex app-server, lazycodex qa, isolated CODEX_HOME, prove codex hook fired, codex tui test.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.
| name | ultragoal |
| description | Create and execute durable repo-native multi-goal plans over GJC goal mode artifacts. |
| source | forked from upstream ultragoal skill and rebranded for GJC |
Use when the user asks for ultragoal, create-goals, complete-goals, durable multi-goal planning, or sequential execution over GJC goal mode.
ultragoal turns a brief into repo-native artifacts and then drives a GJC goal safely through the unified goal tool. New plans default to a stable pointer-style aggregate GJC goal for the whole durable plan in .gjc/ultragoal/goals.json, including later accepted/appended stories under the original brief constraints, while GJC tracks G001/G002 story progress in the ledger. Ultragoal does not require any /goal slash-command between runs. For back-to-back ultragoal runs in one session/thread, call goal({"op":"drop"}) only when goal({"op":"get"}) still reports an active aggregate; then call goal({"op":"create"}). The goal tool stays armed across drop so the next create works in-session, and no slash-command cleanup exists or is required.
.gjc/ultragoal/brief.md.gjc/ultragoal/goals.json.gjc/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl (checkpoint and structured steering audit events)Existing aggregate plans with the legacy enumerated objective are migrated to the stable pointer objective on read, persisted to goals.json, retained in gjcObjectiveAliases for already-active hidden goal reconciliation, and audited with an aggregate_objective_migrated ledger entry.
Use these exact gjc ultragoal commands before spending tool calls rediscovering syntax:
gjc ultragoal status
gjc ultragoal status --json
gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief "<brief>"
gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief-file <path>
gjc ultragoal complete-goals
gjc ultragoal complete-goals --retry-failed
gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status complete --evidence "<evidence>" --gjc-goal-json <goal-get-json-or-path> --quality-gate-json <quality-gate-json-or-path>
gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status failed --evidence "<blocker/evidence>"
gjc ultragoal record-review-blockers --goal-id <id> --title "Resolve final review blockers" --objective "<blocker-resolution objective>" --evidence "<review findings>" --gjc-goal-json <active-goal-get-json-or-path>
Use these exact goal-tool calls for the inline goal state:
goal({"op":"get"})
goal({"op":"create","objective":"<printed aggregate or per-story objective>"})
goal({"op":"complete"})
goal({"op":"drop"})
goal({"op":"resume"})
drop clears the active goal without exiting goal mode; resume reactivates a paused goal.
Use goal({"op":"get"}) snapshots inside Ultragoal for ledger reconciliation. The unified goal tool is the only agent-facing surface for goal state; no /goal subcommand is required.
Decide on the brief. To produce multiple stories, separate them with a reserved @goal: delimiter line; the title follows on the same line and the objective is everything beneath it until the next delimiter:
Shared brief constraints / context go here (optional preamble).
@goal: Parse the intake CSVs
Ingest reviewer CSVs from the watch dir, validate headers, and reject
malformed rows with a per-row reason. Objectives can span multiple lines
and contain `code`, "quotes", or commands — no escaping needed.
@goal: Normalize records
Map raw rows onto the canonical schema and dedupe by record id.
@goal: Export the audit report
Emit an audit-ready report covering every accepted and rejected row.
Delimiter contract:
@goal line is a story boundary only when it starts at column 0 (no leading whitespace) and the character right after @goal is :, whitespace (space or tab), or end-of-line. So @goal: Title, @goal Title, and a bare @goal line all open a story.@goalish, @goals:, @goal-foo, @goal.foo, @goal/foo, and any indented or mid-line @goal are ordinary objective text, not delimiters. To keep a literal @goal line inside an objective, indent it.create-goals errors instead of writing a placeholder goal.@goal delimiter) is global context/constraints only; it is retained in the brief but is not turned into a goal. Every executable story needs its own @goal block.@goal delimiter anywhere, the whole brief becomes a single goal G001 (unchanged legacy behavior).Stories become G001, G002, … in order.
Run one of:
gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief "<brief>"gjc ultragoal create-goals --brief-file <path>cat <brief> | gjc ultragoal create-goals --from-stdingjc ultragoal create-goals --gjc-goal-mode per-story --brief "<brief>" only when one GJC goal context per story is explicitly preferredInspect .gjc/ultragoal/goals.json and refine if needed.
Loop until gjc ultragoal status reports all goals complete:
gjc ultragoal complete-goals.goal({"op":"get"}).goal({"op":"create","objective":"<printed payload objective>"}) with the printed payload. In aggregate mode, if the same aggregate objective is already active, continue the current GJC story without creating a new GJC goal. If goal({"op":"get"}) shows a stale dropped goal (status "dropped") and a new aggregate must start, no extra cleanup is needed — goal({"op":"create"}) succeeds directly. If a previous aggregate is still active and you genuinely need a fresh start in the same session, call goal({"op":"drop"}) first, then goal({"op":"create"}).--status complete checkpoint, run the mandatory final cleanup/review gate below. In aggregate mode, do not call goal({"op":"complete"}) for intermediate stories; checkpoint each story with a fresh goal({"op":"get"}) snapshot whose aggregate objective is still active. On the final story, use the same fresh active snapshot to create the final aggregate receipt first; only after that receipt exists may goal({"op":"complete"}) run.--quality-gate-json; the runtime hook rejects closure without a clean architect review:
gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status complete --evidence "<evidence>" --gjc-goal-json <goal-get-json-or-path> --quality-gate-json <quality-gate-json-or-path>
A successful complete checkpoint is story completion, not automatic run completion. Read the checkpoint output: when it prints Next ultragoal goal: <id>, continue that active story under the same aggregate GJC goal; when it prints All ultragoal goals are complete, the durable run is terminal. gjc ultragoal complete-goals remains the supported manual next-story command if continuation output was missed.gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status failed --evidence "<blocker/evidence>"gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status blocked --evidence "<completed legacy GJC goal blocks goal create in this thread>" --gjc-goal-json <goal-get-json-or-path>gjc ultragoal complete-goals --retry-failed.Use gjc ultragoal steer when real findings or blockers prove the current story decomposition should change while the aggregate objective and constraints stay fixed. Steering is explicit-only and evidence-backed; broad natural-language requests are rejected instead of guessed.
Allowed mutation kinds are:
add_subgoalsplit_subgoalreorder_pendingrevise_pending_wordingannotate_ledgermark_blocked_supersededExamples:
gjc ultragoal steer --kind add_subgoal --title "Investigate blocker" --objective "Validate the blocker and report evidence." --evidence "log/test output" --rationale "The blocker changes the safe execution order." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind split_subgoal --goal-id G002 --replacements-json '[{"title":"Fix parser","objective":"Resolve parser blocker."},{"title":"Verify parser","objective":"Run focused parser verification."}]' --evidence "Implementation split found two separable risks" --rationale "Splitting keeps each sub-goal independently verifiable." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind reorder_pending --order-json '["G003","G002"]' --evidence "Dependency order changed after investigation" --rationale "G003 must land before G002 can proceed safely." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind revise_pending_wording --goal-id G002 --title "Clarify blocker story" --evidence "The current title hides the actual blocker" --rationale "Clear wording keeps the ledger auditable." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind annotate_ledger --evidence "User changed release ordering at runtime" --rationale "The aggregate objective is unchanged, but the execution history needs an audit note." --json
gjc ultragoal steer --kind mark_blocked_superseded --goal-id G004 --evidence "The blocked work is no longer required because replacement evidence covers it" --rationale "No replacement sub-goal is needed; superseding only the blocked sub-goal unblocks final completion without changing the aggregate objective." --json
--directive-json and UserPromptSubmit structured steering are planned/deferred routing surfaces, not part of the native typed --kind CLI path described above.
Steering invariants:
.gjc/ultragoal/goals.json and .gjc/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl, not an enumeration of initial goal ids..gjc/ultragoal..gjc/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl.goals.json with steering metadata and are skipped for scheduling.UserPromptSubmit structured steering directives are a planned/deferred routing surface. Normal prose does not mutate state.
Ultragoal execution should use GJC's bundled role-agent roster when a durable story is large enough to benefit from delegation:
executor for bounded implementation, refactoring, and fix slices.planner for story sequencing or handoff refinement when execution uncovers a missing plan branch.architect for read-only architecture and code-review lanes, including CLEAR / WATCH / BLOCK status.critic for read-only plan or handoff critique before execution proceeds.When delegating with native subagents, an await timeout only limits the leader's wait. It is not subagent failure evidence and must not be used as a cancellation reason; inspect or continue independent work, and cancel only when the subagent has actually failed, gone off-track, or become unrecoverably wrong.
If an Ultragoal request has no approved plan or consensus artifact, run ralplan first and preserve its PRD, test spec, role roster, and verification guidance in the Ultragoal ledger. Do not silently substitute ad-hoc execution for missing planning.
The Ultragoal leader owns .gjc/ultragoal/goals.json and .gjc/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl. Role agents return implementation/review evidence; they do not checkpoint Ultragoal or mutate goal state.
For large subgoals with independent slices, the Ultragoal leader must spawn parallel executor subagents instead of doing serial solo work. Split only cleanly separable files/surfaces, give each executor bounded targets and acceptance criteria, and keep checkpoint ownership in the leader. Use architect / critic review lanes after integration; do not let worker agents mutate .gjc/ultragoal or call goal tools.
Use ultragoal and team together for a durable Ultragoal story that benefits from one visible tmux worker session. Ultragoal remains leader-owned: .gjc/ultragoal/goals.json stores the story plan and .gjc/ultragoal/ledger.jsonl stores checkpoints. Team is the single-worker tmux execution engine and returns task/evidence status to the leader.
The leader checkpoints Ultragoal from Team evidence with a fresh goal({"op":"get"}) snapshot:
gjc ultragoal checkpoint --goal-id <id> --status complete --evidence "<team evidence mentioning .gjc/ultragoal and <id>>" --gjc-goal-json <fresh-goal-get-json-or-path> --quality-gate-json <quality-gate-json-or-path>
Workers do not own ultragoal goal state, do not create worker ultragoal ledgers, and do not checkpoint Ultragoal. Workers must not run gjc ultragoal checkpoint; checkpoint authority stays with the leader after worker tasks are terminal. Team launch remains explicit; Ultragoal does not auto-launch Team and performs no hidden goal mutation.
The completion-gate cleanup sweep is driven by ai-slop-cleaner, an internal Ultragoal sub-skill bundled as a kind: "skill-fragment" prompt with parent skill ultragoal (installed at skill-fragments/ultragoal/ai-slop-cleaner.md). It is analogous to deep-interview's auto-research fragment: loaded on demand for one specific hook, never a user-facing skill.
skill://..gjc/, checkpoints, calls goal tools, or spawns workflows.executor own all fixes; the cleaner reruns until zero blocking findings remain. Advisory findings live in the gate report only.ralplan/team/deep-interview/ultragoal; broad or architectural findings are handed back to the leader as review blockers.An ultragoal story cannot be checkpointed complete until the active agent has run the quality gate. The gate is plan-first, contract-driven, and surface-based:
AI SLOP CLEANUP REPORT; if there are no relevant edits it still runs and records a passed/no-op report. Every BLOCKING cleaner finding is a completion blocker: the leader spawns an executor to fix blocking findings only, then reruns the cleaner until blocking findings are zero. Advisory findings are included in the gate report only and are not written to the Ultragoal ledger. Carry the report through the existing qualityGate.iteration.evidence field; do not add a new top-level quality-gate key.architect review covering all three lanes:
executor QA/red-team lane to build and run the e2e/read-teaming QA suite appropriate for the story. This lane must try to break the change, not just confirm the happy path. It must start from the approved plan/spec/acceptance criteria, then user-facing contracts, and only then implementation code as supporting evidence. Plan/code mismatches are blockers, not items to paper over with implementation intent.inlineEvidence text or typed receipts never prove live GUI/web execution.replaySafe: true, an allowlisted argv command, and replayed normalized stdout matching recordedStdout; unsafe commands require audited replayExempt metadata plus a structurally valid fallback artifact.inlineEvidence text alone is not sufficient for any surface.executorQa.contractCoverage, executorQa.surfaceEvidence, executorQa.adversarialCases, and executorQa.artifactRefs. Not-applicable rows are allowed only in contractCoverage and surfaceEvidence; each status: "not_applicable" row requires contractRef plus reason. adversarialCases rows cannot be not-applicable.architectReview.architectureStatus, architectReview.productStatus, and architectReview.codeStatus are all "CLEAR", architectReview.recommendation is "APPROVE", executor QA statuses are "passed", iteration is "passed" with fullRerun: true, every evidence field is non-empty, every required matrix row is present, and every blockers array is empty. COMMENT, WATCH, REQUEST CHANGES, BLOCK, missing evidence, missing or shallow matrix rows, plan/code mismatches, or non-empty blockers are non-clean.complete and do not call goal({"op":"complete"}). Record durable blocker work instead:
gjc ultragoal record-review-blockers --goal-id <id> --title "Resolve verification blockers" --objective "<blocker-resolution objective>" --evidence "<architect/executor findings>" --gjc-goal-json <active-goal-get-json-or-path>
goal({"op":"get"}) snapshot. The checkpoint creates a receipt; goals.json.status alone is not proof. In aggregate mode, the final aggregate receipt must exist before goal({"op":"complete"}) is allowed.While an Ultragoal run is active, the ask tool is blocked for all agents. Record unresolved review decisions as durable blockers with gjc ultragoal record-review-blockers instead of prompting interactively.
The native checkpoint --status complete command rejects missing or shallow gates. --quality-gate-json must include:
{
"architectReview": {
"architectureStatus": "CLEAR",
"productStatus": "CLEAR",
"codeStatus": "CLEAR",
"recommendation": "APPROVE",
"evidence": "architect review synthesis with architecture/product/code coverage",
"commands": ["architect review command or agent evidence id"],
"blockers": []
},
"executorQa": {
"status": "passed",
"e2eStatus": "passed",
"redTeamStatus": "passed",
"evidence": "executor-built e2e and red-team QA commands/results",
"e2eCommands": ["bun test:e2e"],
"redTeamCommands": ["bun test:red-team"],
"artifactRefs": [
{
"id": "browser-run",
"kind": "browser-automation",
"path": "artifacts/browser-run.json",
"description": "valid automation transcript with actions, monotonic timestamps, and selectors"
},
{
"id": "gui-screenshot",
"kind": "screenshot",
"path": "artifacts/gui-screenshot.png",
"description": "non-uniform screenshot evidence for the GUI/web result"
},
{
"id": "cli-replay",
"kind": "command-replay",
"path": "artifacts/cli-replay.json",
"description": "artifact file containing argv-only CLI replay JSON: schemaVersion 1, kind cli-replay, replaySafe true, allowlisted command, recordedStdout"
},
{
"id": "adversarial-report",
"kind": "failure-mode-test",
"path": "artifacts/adversarial-report.txt",
"description": "boundary, property, adversarial, or failure-mode result"
}
],
"contractCoverage": [
{
"id": "contract-goal",
"contractRef": "approved plan/spec/acceptance criterion or user-facing contract id",
"obligation": "required behavior from the approved contract",
"status": "covered",
"surfaceEvidenceRefs": ["surface-gui"],
"adversarialCaseRefs": ["case-invalid-input"]
},
{
"id": "contract-out-of-scope",
"contractRef": "contract intentionally outside this story",
"obligation": "explicitly omitted approved-contract surface",
"status": "not_applicable",
"reason": "why this contract does not apply to the current story"
}
],
"surfaceEvidence": [
{
"id": "surface-gui",
"contractRef": "user-facing surface or public interface under test",
"surface": "gui|web|cli|api|package|algorithm|math|native|desktop|tui",
"invocation": "real browser action, CLI command, API/package consumer call, or algorithm/property check",
"verdict": "passed",
"artifactRefs": ["browser-run", "gui-screenshot"]
},
{
"id": "surface-cli",
"contractRef": "CLI or command-line interface under test",
"surface": "cli",
"invocation": "argv replay executed by the Ultragoal runtime",
"verdict": "passed",
"artifactRefs": ["cli-replay"]
},
{
"id": "surface-out-of-scope",
"contractRef": "surface intentionally outside this story",
"surface": "gui|web|cli|api|package|algorithm|math|native|desktop|tui",
"status": "not_applicable",
"reason": "why this surface does not apply to the current story"
}
],
"adversarialCases": [
{
"id": "case-invalid-input",
"contractRef": "approved plan/spec/acceptance criterion or user-facing contract id",
"scenario": "boundary/property/adversarial/failure-mode input or user action",
"expectedBehavior": "contract-required rejection, handling, or invariant preservation",
"verdict": "passed",
"artifactRefs": ["adversarial-report"]
}
],
"blockers": []
},
"iteration": {
"status": "passed",
"evidence": "blockers were absent or resolved and the full verification loop was rerun cleanly",
"fullRerun": true,
"rerunCommands": ["bun test:e2e", "bun test:red-team"],
"blockers": []
}
}
For CLI replay artifacts, the JSON at path must be an object like {"schemaVersion":1,"kind":"cli-replay","replaySafe":true,"command":["bun","-e","console.log(\"ultragoal-cli-ok\")"],"recordedStdout":"ultragoal-cli-ok\n"}. Use replayExempt only for audited unsafe/non-deterministic invocations, with a substantive reason, approver, and same-surface fallback artifacts.
gjc ultragoal review runs the same hardened gate against an already implemented PR, branch, or worktree. Use --pr <number> for a PR, --branch <ref> for a branch diff, omit both for the current worktree, and pass --spec <path> when a real contract exists. --mode review-only emits the verdict/findings without creating fix work; --mode review-start records review blockers for follow-up. Review mode validates the same executorQa shape and live-surface artifacts as checkpoint --status complete. A thin or derived-only contract can never clean-pass: the verdict is capped at inconclusive: weak-contract until a supplied spec or equivalent strong acceptance criteria are available.
Receipts are freshness-scoped:
goal_started or clean receipt-backed goal_checkpointed events for other goals do not stale older per-goal receipts.review_blocked required goals remain.When the aggregate ultragoal is complete OR the user requests return to planning/clarification, mark ultragoal ready for handoff so the skill tool's chain guard permits the backward transition:
gjc state ultragoal write --input '{"current_phase":"handoff"}' --json
The skill tool then dispatches /skill:ralplan or /skill:deep-interview same-turn and runs gjc state ultragoal handoff --to <ralplan|deep-interview> --json in-process to atomically demote ultragoal, promote the callee, and sync both skill-active-state.json files. You do not need to run the handoff verb yourself.
/goal slash-command and the agent loop must not depend on any /goal subcommand.goal({"op":"get"}), goal({"op":"create"}), goal({"op":"complete"}), goal({"op":"drop"}), goal({"op":"resume"}). drop clears the active goal without exiting goal mode so the next goal({"op":"create"}) works in-session. No slash-command cleanup exists or is required; Ultragoal never calls any /goal subcommand.goal({"op":"get"}) still reports an active aggregate, call goal({"op":"drop"}) before goal({"op":"create"}); when no active goal exists or the prior aggregate is already complete or dropped, call goal({"op":"create"}) directly. The goal tool remains callable across drop; no slash-command cleanup exists or is required.goal({"op":"create"}) when goal({"op":"get"}) reports a different active goal.goal({"op":"complete"}) unless the aggregate run or legacy per-story goal is actually complete.active GJC goal snapshot; the final story checkpoint creates the final aggregate receipt before goal({"op":"complete"}) may reconcile the inline goal state.goal({"op":"get"}) JSON/path with --gjc-goal-json; shell commands and hooks must not mutate goal state.ledger.jsonl as the durable audit trail; checkpoint after every success or failure.