ワンクリックで
pipeline-test-verify
Comprehensive testing and quality verification pipeline stage (Code → Verified)
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Comprehensive testing and quality verification pipeline stage (Code → Verified)
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Run a multi-agent code review on a GitHub pull request, with parallel security / performance / architecture / style passes, inline comments, and quality-gate enforcement. Use when asked to "github code review", "review github pr", "run code review on PR", "swarm review", "automated PR review", or "post inline review comments".
Manage GitHub issues, project boards, sprints, and milestones with swarm-coordinated automation — issue triage, decomposition into subtasks, board sync, sprint planning, KPI tracking. Use when asked to "github project management", "manage github projects", "github issue automation", "swarm project board", "automate sprint", "triage issues", or "set up project board".
Extract clean article content from a URL (blog post, news article, tutorial) and save it as readable text with ads, navigation, and other clutter removed. Use when asked to "extract article", "scrape text from URL", "download blog post", "parse HTML article", "save article as text", or "clean article content from a webpage".
Dispatch one focused agent per independent problem domain so investigations run concurrently. Use when facing 2+ independent tasks with no shared state — for example "spawn agents in parallel", "parallel debugging", "fan out tasks", "investigate multiple failures at once", or "distribute independent work across agents".
Create HTML dashboards with KPI cards, bar/pie/line charts, progress indicators, and data tables. Use when asked to "create dashboard", "build KPI dashboard", "generate metrics visualization", "make analytics dashboard", "show performance dashboard", or "render data visualization as HTML".
Guide for choosing the right AI coding tool for the task. Use when user asks "which AI should I use", "should I use Claude or Cursor", "what's the best tool for X", or when helping decide between Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, VSCode + Copilot, Gemini, Grok, Codex, Qwen, or this Claude interface.
| name | pipeline-test-verify |
| description | Comprehensive testing and quality verification pipeline stage (Code → Verified) |
| trigger | After implementation, before commit/PR |
Pipeline Position: Fourth stage (Code → Verified)
Previous Stage: pipeline-implement
Next Stage: Ready for commit/PR
Comprehensive quality verification before considering code complete.
Unit Test Verification
Integration Test Verification
Code Quality Verification
Security Verification
Performance Verification
Documentation Verification
## Pre-Commit Verification
### ✅ Tests
- [ ] All unit tests pass
- [ ] Integration tests pass
- [ ] E2E tests pass (if applicable)
- [ ] Coverage >80% on new code
- [ ] No skipped/ignored tests
### ✅ Code Quality
- [ ] Linter passes (zero warnings)
- [ ] Type checker passes (zero errors)
- [ ] No commented-out code
- [ ] Functions < 50 lines
- [ ] Cyclomatic complexity < 10
### ✅ Security
- [ ] No secrets in code
- [ ] Input validation present
- [ ] Auth checks in place
- [ ] Dependencies scanned (npm audit / pip-audit)
- [ ] SQL uses parameterized queries
### ✅ Performance
- [ ] No N+1 queries
- [ ] Database indexes exist
- [ ] Large files streamed (not loaded in memory)
- [ ] API responses < 200ms (or justified)
### ✅ Documentation
- [ ] Public functions have docstrings
- [ ] Complex algorithms explained
- [ ] API docs updated
- [ ] CHANGELOG.md updated
- [ ] Migration guide written (if breaking)
### ✅ Architecture Alignment
- [ ] Follows ADR decisions
- [ ] Consistent with codebase patterns
- [ ] No architectural shortcuts
- [ ] Technical debt documented (if any)
Run these commands before declaring success:
# Testing
npm test # or: pytest, cargo test, etc.
npm run test:integration
npm run test:coverage
# Code Quality
npm run lint
npm run typecheck
npm run format:check
# Security
npm audit # or: pip-audit, cargo audit
npm run security:check
# Performance (if scripts exist)
npm run perf:check
npm run benchmark
Invoke code-reviewer agent if:
Example:
Use code-reviewer agent to review these changes before commit.
## Verification Report: [Feature Name]
### Test Results ✅
✓ Unit Tests: 45 passed ✓ Integration Tests: 12 passed ✓ Coverage: 87% statements, 82% branches
### Code Quality ✅
✓ Linting: 0 errors, 0 warnings ✓ Type Check: 0 errors ✓ Complexity: Max 7 (threshold: 10)
### Security Scan ✅
✓ Secrets: None found ✓ Dependencies: 0 vulnerabilities ✓ Input Validation: All entry points covered
### Performance Benchmarks ✅
✓ API Response: avg 145ms (threshold: 200ms) ✓ Database Queries: 0 N+1 detected ✓ Memory Usage: 45MB peak (threshold: 100MB)
### Documentation ✅
- README.md updated with new feature
- API docs generated
- Migration guide written
### Manual Review
[If code-reviewer agent was used, include summary]
### Approval Status
**STATUS:** ✅ READY FOR COMMIT | ⚠️ NEEDS FIXES | ❌ BLOCKED
**Remaining Issues:**
[List any blockers or required fixes]
### Next Steps
1. [Specific actions needed, if any]
2. Create commit with conventional commit message
3. Push and create PR
Must Pass (BLOCKING):
Should Pass (WARNING):
Nice to Have:
After all checks pass, automatically suggest:
All verification passed. Ready to:
1. Create commit: git add . && git commit -m "feat: [description]"
2. Or invoke code-reviewer agent for manual review first
If verification fails:
Upon successful verification:
✅ Pipeline Complete
Stages Completed:
1. ✅ PM Spec (pipeline-pm-spec)
2. ✅ Architecture Review (pipeline-arch-review)
3. ✅ Implementation (pipeline-implement)
4. ✅ Test Verification (pipeline-test-verify)
Ready for:
- Git commit
- Pull request creation
- Deployment (if CI/CD configured)