ワンクリックで
superpowers
开始任何非琐碎任务时使用——确立 Superpowers 方法论及如何发现/使用其 skill。在任何回复(包括澄清提问)之前先调用相关 skill。对应 deepx 工作模式 sp。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
开始任何非琐碎任务时使用——确立 Superpowers 方法论及如何发现/使用其 skill。在任何回复(包括澄清提问)之前先调用相关 skill。对应 deepx 工作模式 sp。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
当用户想「创建/生成一个 workflow(可复用的多子-agent 编排脚本)」时使用。讲清 deepx workflow 的 JavaScript 脚本格式、可用 API,以及如何用 Workflow 工具保存与运行。
当面对 2 个及以上彼此独立、无共享状态、无先后依赖、可并行处理的任务时使用。
当已有一份写好的实现计划、需要分步执行并在检查点处复核时使用。
当实现完成、测试全过、需要决定如何收尾集成时使用——给出合并 / 提 PR / 清理等结构化选项,引导完成开发收尾。
做有辨识度、生产级、高设计质量的前端界面。当用户要构建网页组件、页面、海报或应用(网站、落地页、仪表盘、React 组件、HTML/CSS 布局,或美化任何 Web UI)时使用。产出有创意、精致、避免千篇一律 AI 风格的代码与界面。
减少 LLM 常见编码错误的行为准则。在写代码、审查或重构时使用:避免过度复杂、做最小化精准改动、显式暴露假设、定义可验证的成功标准。
| name | superpowers |
| description | 开始任何非琐碎任务时使用——确立 Superpowers 方法论及如何发现/使用其 skill。在任何回复(包括澄清提问)之前先调用相关 skill。对应 deepx 工作模式 sp。 |
| license | MIT |
| source | https://github.com/obra/superpowers (skills/using-superpowers), vendored verbatim |
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill. If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.deepx 适配(工具名映射) —— 下文沿用 Claude Code 的工具名,在 deepx 里请按此对应,不要调用不存在的
Skill/TodoWrite/EnterPlanMode:
Skill工具 → deepx 用LoadSkill(按 skill 名加载并遵循)TodoWrite→ deepx 用Todo(全量重发整张待办清单)EnterPlanMode→ deepx 无此工具:可并行拆任务用CreatePlan,或直接在回复里给出计划;/plan模式由用户进入,模型不能自己进Task/ 派发子 agent → deepx 用CreatePlan(拆并发子 agent 的 DAG);单会话内顺序执行则自己逐步做 凡正文出现上述名字,一律换成 deepx 的对应工具。
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
Superpowers skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:
If CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, or AGENTS.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In Copilot CLI: Use the skill tool. Skills are auto-discovered from installed plugins. The skill tool works the same as Claude Code's Skill tool.
In Gemini CLI: Skills activate via the activate_skill tool. Gemini loads skill metadata at session start and activates the full content on demand.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Skills use Claude Code tool names. Non-CC platforms: see references/copilot-tools.md (Copilot CLI), references/codex-tools.md (Codex) for tool equivalents. Gemini CLI users get the tool mapping loaded automatically via GEMINI.md.
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.