ワンクリックで
security-files-integrations-review
Security files/integrations review: uploads, untrusted content, webhooks, SSRF, secrets.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Security files/integrations review: uploads, untrusted content, webhooks, SSRF, secrets.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
.NET API review: architecture, validation, auth, EF Core, jobs, deployment, tests.
Effect TS review: services, layers, errors, Schema, concurrency, resources, tests.
Hey API review: OpenAPI specs, generated clients, SDKs, auth, validation, CI.
Container build review: Dockerfiles, image size, layers, SBOM, CVEs, reproducibility.
Container runtime review: env, secrets, health checks, resources, volumes, shutdown.
Production readiness review: deploy, rollback, monitoring, capacity, backups, runbooks.
| name | security-files-integrations-review |
| description | Security files/integrations review: uploads, untrusted content, webhooks, SSRF, secrets. |
Check file trust, storage access, scanning, webhook authenticity, outbound request limits, live event authorization, and integration failure modes.
For broad or materially risky pull requests, recommend focused additional review only when independent expertise is likely to improve the verdict. Judge this from concrete risk, novelty, blast radius, reversibility, and context size—not file count or category matching alone. Small and conventional changes should remain one pragmatic pass.
When additional reviewers add value, split only by independent material surfaces. Each returns concrete evidence-based findings; the main agent removes duplicates and false positives and owns the proportional final verdict.
Prefer code, tests, logs, config, API contracts, and data examples over assumptions.