aigon-research-spec-revise

name	aigon-research-spec-revise
description	Revise research spec after pending spec reviews — decide and acknowledge in one pass

aigon-research-spec-revise

You are the author-side agent. Review all pending spec-review: commits on the research spec, decide what to keep, and land one acknowledgement commit.

The continuity strategy is selected by Aigon before launch. Do not choose a provider or resume strategy yourself. When resumed, reconcile remembered paths against the current checkout and emit the requested continuation ready/fallback checkpoint before editing.

Resolve the spec

SPEC_PATH=$(find docs/specs/research-topics -maxdepth 2 \( -name "research-$1-*.md" -o -name "research-$1.md" \) | head -1)
test -n "$SPEC_PATH" && echo "$SPEC_PATH"

If SPEC_PATH is empty, stop and report that the research spec could not be resolved.

Find pending review commits

LAST_ACK=$(git log --follow --format=%H -n 1 --grep='^spec-review-check:' --grep='^spec-revise:' -- "$SPEC_PATH")
echo "last_ack=${LAST_ACK:-none}"
git log --follow --format='%H %s' -- "$SPEC_PATH"

Pending reviews are commits whose subject starts with spec-review: and are newer than LAST_ACK if LAST_ACK exists.

For every pending review commit:

git show <sha> -- "$SPEC_PATH"
git show -s --format=%B <sha>

Decide in one pass

Process all pending reviewers together. Accept, revert, or modify the reviewed changes, then leave the spec in its final state.

Acknowledge with one commit

git add "$SPEC_PATH"
git commit --allow-empty -m "spec-revise: research $1 — <decision summary>" -m "reviewed: <comma-separated reviewer ids>

Decision:
- <accept|revert|modify summary>

Notes:
- <important rationale>"
aigon research-spec-revise-record $1

Report

Tell the user:

1. Which pending reviews you processed.
2. Whether you accepted, reverted, or modified the reviewed changes.
3. Any follow-up edits you made to the spec.