| name | create-onboarding-guide |
| description | Create a developer onboarding guide when the user asks to write onboarding docs, create a getting started guide, document the setup process, or help new developers ramp up |
| author | chalk |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| metadata-version | 3 |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Write |
| argument-hint | [project name, team, or specific onboarding focus] |
| read-only | false |
| destructive | false |
| idempotent | false |
| open-world | true |
| user-invocable | true |
| tags | onboarding, docs, developer-experience |
Create Onboarding Guide
Overview
Generate a structured developer onboarding guide by reading all available .chalk/docs/ documentation and curating it into a progressive learning path. The guide follows a Day 1 / Week 1 / Month 1 structure, starting with environment setup and a first commit, then expanding to architecture understanding and feature ownership. Every step is concrete and runnable — no "ask around" or tribal knowledge assumptions.
Workflow
-
Read all available documentation — Scan the full .chalk/docs/ directory tree:
.chalk/docs/product/ for product profile, PRDs, user stories, and roadmap
.chalk/docs/engineering/ for architecture docs, ADRs, runbooks, and incident history
.chalk/docs/ai/ for analysis documents and research
- Root
.chalk/docs/ for any overview or index documents
Build a mental map of what documentation exists and what gaps remain.
-
Inspect the codebase — Use Bash and Glob to understand the project structure:
- Package manager and dependency files (package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, etc.)
- Build and run scripts
- Test framework and test file patterns
- Environment configuration (.env.example, config files)
- CI/CD configuration
- Linting and formatting tools
-
Parse the onboarding scope — From $ARGUMENTS, identify:
- Which project or team the guide is for
- Whether the guide targets a specific role (frontend, backend, full-stack, etc.)
- Any specific areas the user wants emphasized
If not specified, create a general full-stack onboarding guide.
-
Build the Day 1 section — Environment setup and first commit:
- Step-by-step setup instructions with copy-pasteable commands
- How to run the application locally
- How to run the test suite
- A "hello world" first task: a small, safe change that exercises the full development workflow (edit, test, commit, PR)
Verify setup steps against actual project files (package.json scripts, Makefile targets, etc.).
-
Build the Week 1 section — Architecture and first real contribution:
- Curated reading list from existing docs, ordered from foundational to detailed
- Simplified architecture overview (key services, data flow, external dependencies)
- A starter task: a real but well-scoped issue that builds understanding
- Key concepts the developer must understand to be effective
- Common gotchas that trip up new team members (based on incident reports, ADRs, and codebase patterns)
-
Build the Month 1 section — Ownership and cross-cutting concerns:
- Feature ownership expectations
- Cross-cutting concerns: authentication, logging, error handling, deployment, monitoring
- How to navigate the codebase for common tasks
- Who to ask about what (mapped to teams or roles, not individuals)
-
Create the reading list — Order all .chalk/docs/ files into a recommended reading sequence:
- Start with product profile and architecture overview
- Then PRDs and ADRs relevant to the developer's area
- Then runbooks and operational docs
- Mark which docs are "required reading" vs. "reference"
-
Identify gaps — Flag any onboarding needs that are not covered by existing documentation:
- Missing setup instructions
- Undocumented architecture decisions
- Tribal knowledge that should be written down
List these as "Documentation TODOs" at the end of the guide.
-
Determine the next file number — List files in .chalk/docs/ai/ to find the highest numbered file. Increment by 1.
-
Write the file — Save to .chalk/docs/ai/<n>_onboarding_guide.md.
-
Confirm — Present the guide with a summary of what is covered, the recommended reading list, and any documentation gaps that need to be filled.
Onboarding Guide Structure
# Developer Onboarding Guide
**Project**: <project name>
**Last Updated**: <YYYY-MM-DD>
**Target Audience**: <role or "all developers">
## Day 1: Setup and First Commit
### Environment Setup
Prerequisites:
- <language runtime> (version <X.Y+>)
- <package manager>
- <database or other local services>
- <any other tools>
Step-by-step:
1. **Clone the repository**
```bash
git clone <repo-url>
cd <project-name>
-
Install dependencies
<install command>
-
Configure environment
cp .env.example .env
-
Start local services
<command to start database, etc.>
-
Run the application
<run command>
You should see:
-
Run the test suite
<test command>
Expected: All tests pass. If not, check .
Your First Commit
Complete this task to verify your setup and learn the workflow:
Task: <small, safe change — e.g., "Add your name to CONTRIBUTORS.md" or "Update a log message">
- Create a branch:
git checkout -b onboarding/<your-name>
- Make the change:
- Run tests:
<test command>
- Commit:
git add <files> && git commit -m "<message>"
- Push:
git push -u origin onboarding/<your-name>
- Open a PR following the team's PR template
This exercises: branching, local development, testing, and the PR process.
Week 1: Architecture and First Contribution
Recommended Reading (Ordered)
| Order | Document | Type | Required |
|---|
| 1 | | Product Context | Yes |
| 2 | | Technical | Yes |
| 3 | | Decision Record | Yes |
| 4 | | Product Requirements | Recommended |
| 5 | | Operations | Reference |
Architecture Overview
<Simplified description of the system architecture: key services, how they communicate, data flow, external dependencies. Use a text diagram if helpful.>
<simple ASCII architecture diagram>
Key Concepts
To be effective in this codebase, understand these concepts:
- —
- —
- —
Common Gotchas
Issues that trip up every new team member:
Starter Task
Task: <a real, well-scoped issue that a new developer can complete in 2-3 days>
Why this task:
Resources:
- Relevant code:
<file paths>
- Related doc:
<doc reference>
Month 1: Ownership and Cross-Cutting Concerns
Cross-Cutting Concerns
| Concern | How It Works | Key Files | Documentation |
|---|
| Authentication | | | |
| Error Handling | | | |
| Logging | | | |
| Deployment | | | |
| Monitoring | | | |
Navigating the Codebase
Common tasks and where to find them:
| Task | Where to Look | Example |
|---|
| Add a new API endpoint | <path> | <example file> |
| Add a database migration | <path> | <example file> |
| Add a new UI component | <path> | <example file> |
| Add a test | <path> | <example file> |
Who to Ask About What
Documentation Gaps
The following onboarding needs are not covered by existing documentation and should be written:
## Output
- **File**: `.chalk/docs/ai/<n>_onboarding_guide.md`
- **Format**: Plain markdown, no YAML frontmatter
- **First line**: `# Developer Onboarding Guide`
## Anti-patterns
- **Information dump without ordering** — Dropping 20 documents on a new developer and saying "read these" is not onboarding. Documents must be ordered from foundational to detailed, with required vs. reference clearly marked.
- **No runnable first task** — A developer who cannot run the app and make a change on Day 1 will lose confidence and momentum. The "hello world" task must be completable in under 2 hours with the setup instructions provided.
- **Assuming tribal knowledge** — "Ask Sarah about the auth system" is not documentation. If knowledge exists only in someone's head, the onboarding guide should flag it as a documentation gap, not encode the dependency on a specific person.
- **Outdated setup steps** — Setup instructions that fail on the first command destroy trust in the entire guide. Verify all commands against actual project files. Include version requirements and common failure modes.
- **No architecture context** — Jumping into code without understanding the system architecture leads to local optimizations and broken mental models. The Week 1 architecture overview provides the map before the developer starts navigating the territory.
- **Missing "who to ask"** — New developers need to know which team owns what. Map areas of responsibility to teams and roles, not individuals (people change roles; team responsibilities are more stable).
- **No documentation gap tracking** — If the onboarding guide cannot cover a topic because no documentation exists, that gap must be explicitly listed. Otherwise the gap persists invisibly and every new developer hits the same wall.