ワンクリックで
shallow
Prevents overthinking by matching cognitive investment to consequence - the intentional opposite of DEEP-THINK.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Prevents overthinking by matching cognitive investment to consequence - the intentional opposite of DEEP-THINK.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Designs API contracts for consumer experience first — making correct usage obvious and incorrect usage impossible.
Replaces adjectives with evidence, claims with demonstrations, and promises with proof for conversion-oriented writing.
Forces the model to build a genuine prosecution case against its own answer before delivering it.
Detects and corrects objective drift during extended tasks by periodically checking work against the original request.
Decides whether to ask clarifying questions or proceed with an answer, optimizing for information value vs. delay cost.
Self-selects and sequences the right depth-skills proportional to task consequence, preventing both under- and over-analysis.
| name | shallow |
| codename | SHALLOW |
| internal | Proportional Depth Protocol |
| version | 1.1 |
| tier | cognition |
| trigger | low-stakes task, reversible decision, "keep it simple", "don't overthink", quick answer needed |
| description | Prevents overthinking by matching cognitive investment to consequence - the intentional opposite of DEEP-THINK. |
| author | Kshitijpalsinghtomar |
| tags | ["proportionality","efficiency","overthinking","quick-answer","depth-calibration"] |
| artifacts | ["depth-assessment","budget-allocation","shallow-delivery-verdict"] |
| composable_with | ["deep-think","threshold","conductor"] |
DEEP-THINK is essential. But not every task deserves it. Sometimes the deepest answer is a short one.
The failure mode of depth-skills is depth bias: the model reaches for sophisticated analysis on problems that don't warrant it. A CSS color choice gets 6-step reasoning. A routine email gets threat-modeled. This skill is the brake.
You are about to:
If the cost of being wrong is low and the fix is easy — this is a SHALLOW task.
Evaluate the task against depth criteria:
DEPTH ASSESSMENT
────────────────────────────────────────
Reversibility: [Trivial / Moderate / Hard / Permanent]
→ If Trivial/Moderate: favor SHALLOW
Consequence: [Trivial / Moderate / Significant / Critical]
→ If Trivial/Moderate: favor SHALLOW
Complexity: [Simple / Moderate / Complex / Intricate]
→ If Simple: favor SHALLOW
Pattern match: [Routine / Variation / Novel / Unprecedented]
→ If Routine: favor SHALLOW
Stakeholders: [One / Few / Many / All-hands]
→ If One/Few: favor SHALLOW
Urgency: [Can wait / Within hour / Within minute / Now]
→ If "can wait" is false: favor SHALLOW (speed matters)
────────────────────────────────────────
Score: Count SHALLOW-favoring answers.
Artifact: Depth assessment with score. Step 2 allocates budget.
Based on the assessment, allocate:
BUDGET ALLOCATION
────────────────────────────────────────
Assessment score: [N]/6
Depth budget: [MINIMAL / LIGHT / MODERATE]
MINIMAL (score 5-6):
- No artifacts required
- One sentence answer
- Skip caveats
- Skip alternatives
- Skip "it depends"
LIGHT (score 3-4):
- One artifact: answer with ONE assumption stated
- One alternative mentioned in 1 sentence
- One caveat if genuinely important
MODERATE (score 2-3):
- Two artifacts: restatement + chosen approach
- Skip challenge phase
- Minimal boundary check
────────────────────────────────────────
Artifact: Budget allocation. Step 3 delivers within budget.
Execute the answer within allocated depth:
SHALLOW DELIVERY
────────────────────────────────────────
Budget level: [MINIMAL / LIGHT / MODERATE]
Answer: [deliver within budget constraints]
If MINIMAL:
Answer only. No preamble. No caveats.
If LIGHT:
State ONE assumption. Mention ONE alternative.
One sentence each, inline.
If MODERATE:
Restate in one sentence.
Give the answer.
One-line boundary: "works for [common case], not [edge case]."
────────────────────────────────────────
SHALLOW should NOT activate when:
The default should still be appropriate depth. SHALLOW is a targeted counter to depth bias — not a replacement for sound judgment.
The depth-skills library is optimized for depth. But cognitive investment should match consequence. SHALLOW provides the calibration: a simple scoring system that routes low-stakes tasks to fast answers. It's not anti-thinking — it's proportional-thinking. The skill exists because the library's other skills make over-analysis easy. SHALLOW makes under-analysis acceptable.