deploy

name

deploy

description

Bridge skill that delegates complex OpenSpec changes to Oh My ClaudeCode (OMC) team/ralph mode. Triggered when user says "run with team", "parallelize", "delegate to ralph", "start big task", "delegate full implementation", or when an OpenSpec change has 4+ tasks, multiple domains, or phased structure. Best for large-scale parallelizable implementations and refactoring requiring iterative verification.

OpenSpec → OMC Deploy Bridge

Bridge skill that hands off complex OpenSpec planning artifacts to OMC team or ralph mode. Automatically determines the optimal execution strategy by running a preflight pass, resolving the canonical execution context, and analyzing task structure.

When to use

• tasks.md has 4 or more tasks
• Work is divided into multiple phases
• Changes span multiple domains (frontend + backend, DDL + service + tests, etc.)
• Refactoring requiring iterative verification until completion

Execution flow

Step 1: Identify target change

Scan for active changes, same as quick.

ls -d openspec/changes/*/tasks.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v archive

If multiple changes exist, ask the user to select one.

Step 2: Preflight and validate artifacts

Complex work requires the full artifact set and a clear execution context:

CHANGE_DIR="openspec/changes/<change-name>"
MISSING=""
test -f "$CHANGE_DIR/proposal.md" || MISSING="$MISSING proposal.md"
test -f "$CHANGE_DIR/design.md"   || MISSING="$MISSING design.md"
test -f "$CHANGE_DIR/tasks.md"    || MISSING="$MISSING tasks.md"
# Check for delta specs
ls "$CHANGE_DIR/specs/" 2>/dev/null | head -1 || MISSING="$MISSING delta-specs"

• If tasks.md or design.md is missing, stop and guide user to run /opsx:continue or /opsx:ff
• If delta specs are missing, warn but proceed (not all changes require deltas)
• If a compacted execution brief exists, treat it as the primary implementation handoff and use the full artifacts as supporting evidence

Preferred compacted brief candidates:

ls "$CHANGE_DIR"/implementation-brief.md \
   "$CHANGE_DIR"/brief.md \
   "$CHANGE_DIR"/context.md \
   "$CHANGE_DIR"/handoff.md 2>/dev/null | head -1

Preflight checklist:

• Resolve the canonical artifact set for the change
• Detect whether a compacted brief is available
• Confirm tasks.md is current and still reflects pending work
• Identify phase boundaries and obvious dependency edges
• Mark phases that are safe to parallelize internally
• Surface any ambiguity before delegating to OMC

Step 3: Analyze tasks and determine execution strategy

Parse tasks.md to analyze the work structure:

Analysis criteria:

• Total task count (pending - [ ] items)
• Number of phases (## Phase, ## Stage, or similar headers)
• Inter-task dependencies (whether Phase N tasks depend on Phase N-1 results)
• Domain distribution (DDL, Kotlin services, tests, frontend, etc.)

Strategy decision matrix:

Condition	OMC Mode	Rationale
Sequential phases with strong dependencies	ralph	Step-by-step with verification
Independent tasks within a phase	team N:executor	Parallel processing
Single phase, 4+ tasks	team N:executor	Simple parallelization
Refactoring requiring iterative verification	ralph	Repeats until architect approval
Sequential phases + parallelizable tasks within	ralph + team per phase	Hybrid approach with phase gates

Agent count calculation:

• Half the number of independent tasks (rounded up), minimum 2, maximum 5
• Example: 6 independent tasks → team 3:executor

Default recommendation rules:

• Choose ralph when the overall flow is sequential and mistakes in earlier phases will invalidate later work
• Choose hybrid when the global phase order is sequential, but one or more phases have internally parallelizable tasks
• Choose plain team only when most work is independent and can safely proceed without serialized phase gates

Step 4: Assemble rich context

Extract context from all artifacts with this precedence:

1. Compacted brief (if present) → Primary execution handoff, accepted scope, non-goals, phase notes
2. proposal.md → Motivation, scope, constraints
3. delta specs → GIVEN/WHEN/THEN scenarios (used as verification criteria)
4. design.md → Architectural decisions, component design, data flow
5. tasks.md → Full checklist

Also read openspec/project.md to include project-wide context (tech stack, conventions).

Important context handling rules:

• Treat the compacted brief as the execution-facing summary, not as a replacement for the source artifacts
• Preserve acceptance criteria, edge cases, non-goals, and explicit constraints from the full spec set
• If the compacted brief conflicts with source artifacts, stop and ask the user which one is canonical
• When no compacted brief exists, build a concise implementation handoff from the canonical artifacts before delegating

Step 5: Delegate by strategy

Strategy A: ralph mode (sequential + iterative verification)

ralph Implement the following changes. Do not stop until complete.

## Project Context
[Tech stack and conventions extracted from project.md]

## Change Background
[Summary from proposal.md]

## Architectural Decisions (must follow)
[Key content from design.md]

## Verification Scenarios
[GIVEN/WHEN/THEN from delta specs — criteria for Architect verification]

## Tasks (proceed in order)
[Full text of tasks.md]

## Guidelines
- Verify each phase against its GIVEN/WHEN/THEN scenarios upon completion
- Never deviate from design.md architectural decisions
- Update tasks.md with [x] as each task completes
- Fix immediately if existing tests break
- Run the full test suite after all phases are complete

Strategy B: hybrid mode (ralph orchestration with team inside selected phases)

Use ralph as the outer orchestrator. For phases that are parallelizable internally, instruct ralph to delegate only that phase's independent work to team, wait for verification, then continue to the next phase.

Prompt structure to compose:

ralph Implement the following phased change. Keep global phase order intact.

## Project Context
[Extracted from project.md]

## Change Background
[Summary from compacted brief or proposal.md]

## Architectural Decisions (must follow)
[Key content from design.md]

## Verification Scenarios
[GIVEN/WHEN/THEN from delta specs]

## Execution Plan
- Follow phases in order
- Use team mode only for the phases explicitly marked parallelizable
- Verify each phase before continuing
- If a phase fails verification, repair it before moving on
- If interrupted, resume from the last incomplete phase rather than restarting everything

## Parallelizable Phases
[Example: Phase 4 storage adapters, Phase 9 notification fan-out]

## Tasks
[Full text of tasks.md]

Strategy C: team mode (parallel execution)

team [N]:executor Implement the following tasks in parallel.

## Project Context
[Extracted from project.md]

## Change Background
[Summary from proposal.md]

## Architectural Decisions (all agents must follow)
[Key content from design.md]

## Task Distribution
### Agent 1: [domain/role]
[Assigned task list]

### Agent 2: [domain/role]
[Assigned task list]

### Agent N: [domain/role]
[Assigned task list]

## Common Guidelines
- Check off completed tasks as [x] in tasks.md
- Strictly follow design.md architectural decisions
- Do not modify files owned by other agents
- Run tests for your assigned area upon completion

Step 6: User confirmation before execution

Show the analysis results and get user approval before delegating:

OpenSpec → OMC Delegation Analysis

Change: add-jmx-metrics-table
Tasks: 8 (3 phases)
Strategy: hybrid (ralph orchestrator with team inside Phase 4-5 and Phase 9-10)

Phase 1: DDL & Infrastructure (3 tasks)
Phase 2: Service Layer (3 tasks) — depends on Phase 1
Phase 3: Testing (2 tasks) — depends on Phase 2

Verification scenarios: 3 (from delta specs)
Resume support: start from last incomplete phase if interrupted

Proceed? [Y/n]
To change strategy, say "switch to team" or "use autopilot instead".

When the analysis shows a sequential global flow with only a few parallelizable phases, recommend hybrid instead of plain team.

Step 7: Post-completion guidance

Once OMC execution completes:

1. Check tasks.md completion status — report any remaining incomplete items
2. If incomplete items remain, inform the user and suggest running this skill again
3. If execution was interrupted mid-plan, identify the last completed phase and offer to resume from the next incomplete phase
4. If all tasks are complete, present the user with a choice for the next step:

All tasks complete. What would you like to do next?

1. /opsx:verify — Validate implementation against delta spec scenarios
2. /opsx:archive — Archive this change (skip verification)
3. Skip — Do nothing for now

Choose [1/2/3]:

Use AskUserQuestion to present this choice. Based on the user's selection:

• 1 (verify): Invoke the /opsx:verify skill
• 2 (archive): Invoke the /opsx:archive skill
• 3 (skip): End with no further action

Notes

• Team mode requires an active tmux session. On Termux, verify tmux setup first.
• Too many agents may hit rate limits. 5 or fewer recommended.
• For changes without delta specs, use tasks.md items themselves as verification criteria.
• If the user disagrees with the strategy, adjust immediately. This skill's judgment is a suggestion, not a mandate.
• For large multi-phase changes, ralph or hybrid should be the default. Plain team is for work that is genuinely independent.