ワンクリックで
setup-tracking
Configure this repo with its issue tracker and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other skills.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
メニュー
Configure this repo with its issue tracker and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other skills.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along up to three axes — Correctness (real runtime defects), Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?), and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs the axes as parallel, adversarially-verified sub-agents via the Workflow tool and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
Scaffold a new JavaScript/TypeScript project with the preferred pnpm setup (worktree-agnostic store, symlinked executables). Use when creating a greenfield JS/TS project.
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.
Parallel code review (and optional autofix) of the current branch and every branch stacked upstack of it, each scoped to its own parent diff. Runs /code-review's shared workflow once per branch over a Graphite stack. Use when you want to review (and optionally fix) the current branch and its stack. Pass --upstack to skip the current branch and review only descendants.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | setup-tracking |
| description | Configure this repo with its issue tracker and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other skills. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Scaffold the per-repo configuration that the engineering skills assume:
CONTEXT.md and ADRs live, and the consumer rules for reading themThis is a prompt-driven skill, not a deterministic script. Explore, present what you found, confirm with the user, then write.
Look at the current repo to understand its starting state. Read whatever exists; don't assume:
git remote -v and .git/config — is this a GitHub repo? Which one?AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md at the repo root — does either exist? Is there already an ## Agent skills section in either?CONTEXT.md and CONTEXT-MAP.md at the repo rootdocs/adr/ and any src/*/docs/adr/ directoriesdocs/agents/ — does this skill's prior output already exist?.scratch/ — sign that a local-markdown issue tracker convention is already in usepnpm-workspace.yaml, a workspaces field in package.json, or a populated packages/* with its own src/. Present only in a genuinely large multi-package repo; their absence means single-context, which is almost every repo.Summarise what's present and what's missing. Then take the sections in order — one section, one answer, then the next.
Lead each section with the recommended answer so the user can accept it in a word. Give a one-line explainer only when the choice genuinely branches; skip the section entirely when exploration already settled it (Section B when there's no monorepo).
Section A — Issue tracker.
Explainer: The "issue tracker" is where issues live for this repo. Skills like
to-ticketsandto-specread from and write to it — they need to know whether to callgh issue create, write a markdown file under.scratch/, or follow some other workflow you describe. Pick the place you actually track work for this repo.
Default posture: these skills were designed for GitHub. If a git remote points at GitHub, propose that. Otherwise (or if the user prefers), offer:
gh CLI)linear MCP).scratch/<feature>/ in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)Record the choice in docs/agents/issue-tracker.md.
Section B — Domain docs. Default to single-context — one CONTEXT.md + docs/adr/ at the repo root. This fits almost every repo; write it without asking.
Offer multi-context — a root CONTEXT-MAP.md pointing to per-context CONTEXT.md files — only when exploration found monorepo signals. Then confirm which layout they want.
Show the user a draft of:
## Agent skills block to add to whichever of CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md is being edited (see step 4 for selection rules)docs/agents/issue-tracker.md and docs/agents/domain.mdLet them edit before writing.
Pick the file to edit:
CLAUDE.md exists, edit it.AGENTS.md exists, edit it.Never create AGENTS.md when CLAUDE.md already exists (or vice versa) — always edit the one that's already there.
If an ## Agent skills block already exists in the chosen file, update its contents in-place rather than appending a duplicate. Don't overwrite user edits to the surrounding sections.
The block:
## Agent skills
### Issue tracker
[one-line summary of where issues are tracked]. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.
### Domain docs
[one-line summary of layout — "single-context" or "multi-context"]. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
Include the ### Triage labels sub-block, and write docs/agents/triage-labels.md, only when triage is installed and Section B ran. When it isn't, both are omitted.
Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a starting point:
For "other" issue trackers, write docs/agents/issue-tracker.md from scratch using the user's description.
Tell the user the setup is complete and which skills will now read from these files. Mention they can edit docs/agents/*.md directly later — re-running this skill is only necessary if they want to switch issue trackers or restart from scratch.